[XF]nVIDIA ForceWare 177.70

Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce Drivers Section' started by me3850, Jul 23, 2008.

  1. SoLoR

    SoLoR Master Guru

    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    6
    GPU:
    MSI GTX 1660 Ti
    eh... for all that was SARCASM! ;)
     
  2. Arjan0597

    Arjan0597 Member Guru

    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    SLI 9600GT 800/2000/2300
    Anyone see diferrence between 177.70/177.72?
     
  3. Tomatomanz

    Tomatomanz Guest

    Aight, this 177.70 :thumbup: seems to be more stable than my previous drivers which its the 177.66 (which i had crashes and the nvidia sentinel keep telling me i dont have enough power... weird :3eyes:).

    I juz did CompanyofHeroes : OppossingForce benchmark:-
    1920x1200res + NoAA + All High Settings on WinXP32bit
    AVG 123.8fps
    MAX 269fps
    MIN 45.2fps

    Will do some 3Dmark benchy later ;)

    Cheers :D
     
  4. Chuck_IV

    Chuck_IV Member

    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX280 SCC
    Gotta agree with AOC. No artifacting or 2x4's sticking out of player model's heads like 177.66. Seems they are also getting better with the shader 3.0 issue with fire in villas. I say getting better because it is better, but still not perfect. In prior 177 drivers, when entering a villa with fire, my framerates would drop to 10 or below(normal FPS is 60+). Now, in the villa with fire, it only drops to 25-30 and stays normal if I'm not facing the fire.

    So they are making progress.
     

  5. beerbaronstatic

    beerbaronstatic New Member

    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Nvidia 9800 gtx+ 512MB
    Anyone running these on a mobile card that can tell if they're still causing higher temps? 177.66 made my 8600m gt run much hotter than any other driver so far
     
  6. ereetos

    ereetos Member Guru

    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX280 SLi
    rofl.... yea the "two by fours" sticking outta peoples heads really was the reason i quit using 177.66 ;)

    it just bugged the crap outta me for some reason.
     
  7. fr33k

    fr33k Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,260
    Likes Received:
    132
    GPU:
    MSI 4080 VENTUS OC
    ah but the major difference is guru doesn't go around to other forums posting them.
    Plus i believe nvidia required them to change the main logo when modifying the inf file.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2008
  8. Mineria

    Mineria Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,540
    Likes Received:
    701
    GPU:
    Asus RTX 3080 Ti
    fr33k, those guys are not from some english site, and it's not even sure that they post them here themself.
    Plus that some of us got good experience with these drivers, so we are happy to get them.
    I couldn't care less about the logo added, those site links your talking about I don't see either.
    Maybe cause I'm using 7z and extract the files. Logo doesn't pop up here either when I run the drivers setup.
    So its really no problem when the logo and site-links are shown cause you run the selfextracting exe.
    You ever seen the Z-Tweaked, NGO, Omega, DNA, Starforce or Xtreme-G drivers? I think they all came with logos and links.
    So I really don't get what hurts you so much.
    Your working for nVidia or got stocks in some driver department?
     
  9. theonlybabyface

    theonlybabyface Member Guru

    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    ASUS TUF 7900 XTX
    I have to agree. These drivers run awesome with my GX2 under Vista x64. :banana:
     
  10. Rich_Guy

    Rich_Guy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,146
    Likes Received:
    1,096
    GPU:
    MSI 2070S X-Trio
    This is how we get our drivers seen as Nvidia don't do the *****, so im all for the leaked/modded ones, as if it wasn't for them, we would have no bloody drivers.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2008

  11. _cTn_

    _cTn_ Master Guru

    Messages:
    571
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ASUS STRIX 980TI
    /agree
     
  12. jimpsar

    jimpsar Guest

    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    6900xt MERC 319 XFX
    Hello,
    I ve just build an 9800gx2 quad sli pc or at least trying to :).
    The problem is that when I enable quad sli using 177.66 and 177.70 (which seems to be the best drivers for a single 9800gx2) cannot run anything.
    I got black screen in every application I am trying.While with 175.19 everything seems to run ok but not too much of good results in fps.
    Any idea of what is wrong or what I am doing wrong?Any other driver
    suggestion for best results?
     
  13. BaneComes

    BaneComes Banned

    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    580GTX Twin Frozr II/OC
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2008
  14. ereetos

    ereetos Member Guru

    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX280 SLi
    havnt seen anyone with good results yet using quad-sli and the 177.x beta drivers... just keep tryin the new drivers as they come out, maybe the final version of these (supposed to be out next month) will improve quad-sli
     
  15. Arjan0597

    Arjan0597 Member Guru

    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    SLI 9600GT 800/2000/2300
    Difference between 177.70 and 177.72?
     

  16. Hootmon

    Hootmon Guest

    Messages:
    1,231
    Likes Received:
    6
    GPU:
    XFX THICC III Ultra
    Good drivers. Im crashing much less often in Mass Effect.
     
  17. DooGie

    DooGie Guest

    Messages:
    567
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 970 SC
    I'm finding these are good drivers. I can't see any difference in iQ between these and 177.66 but fps are up in all games I've tried them in.

    However in profiles if I set it to show "Only programs installed on this computer" I get no list. If I try and add one manually then the CP crashes.

    As for the logo added, I never see it because I always install through device manager. So I haven't got a problem with that.
     
  18. Darkuser

    Darkuser Member

    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    HD4870
    This lol.

    I had to remove my overclock to play mass effect. Passes stability tests but not the mass effect test =p

    Have to agree with everyone else though. Seems like 177.66 in performance and IQ. I haven't had a computer sleep/hibernate BSOD or any random BSOD's while I'm watching a movie or surfing the net with these so far, and they were happening quite often with 177.66.
     
  19. KommunistDK

    KommunistDK Master Guru

    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ATI HD 5850
    Fixed a cloak bug i had in Crysis :) Good enough for me
     
  20. 90Ozkr

    90Ozkr Active Member

    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    9600gt OC 765/1928/1136
    Well, since i tried to run 177.72 on XP and was actually able to install them with a few issues only (yeah right..) these drivers seem to be better at everything D:
    from Folding, to every game i have. got around... 150 PPD improvement

    In DMC4, i got an A, downloaded the demo since everyone here seems to use it as Benchmark reference. Didnt take a screenshot though.

    EDIT: Oh and better OC capabilities than 177.66, managed to get these clocks
    765/1928/1136
    as previous...
    750/1900/1140
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2008

Share This Page