Wolfenstein - The New Order - BENCHMARK

Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by bigosik, May 22, 2014.

  1. bigosik

    bigosik Banned

    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    3072
  2. -Tj-

    -Tj- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    16,504
    Likes Received:
    1,534
    GPU:
    Zotac GTX980Ti OC
    And?

    That Russian benchmark said otherwise, will wait for more benchmarks.
     
  3. Noisiv

    Noisiv Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,664
    Likes Received:
    504
    GPU:
    2070 Super
    And??
    You'll buy GF and continue to disparage NV(drivers, PhysX, CUDA, company ethos)
    Business as usual :)

    When it comes to AMD/OpenGL and Wolfenstein, situation is much better than when RAGE was released.

    poor GTX 580, but would you look at that GTX 750 Ti little monstrosity.

    NV has CUDA transcoding BUT
    AMD has 4GB of VRAM alleviating the need for vt compression :banana:
     
  4. -Tj-

    -Tj- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    16,504
    Likes Received:
    1,534
    GPU:
    Zotac GTX980Ti OC
    Failed trolling, I was questioning 280x vs 770 remark, not nvidia or whateva..

    And so what if I complain about nv and drivers, I made my point and both physx and drivers are much better now :p





    btw, PCGH obviously tested with VT_compression - off.


    I rather use compression and have 4-8k or even 16k textures then lousy 512, but that's just me.
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2014

  5. Noisiv

    Noisiv Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,664
    Likes Received:
    504
    GPU:
    2070 Super
  6. versedluke

    versedluke New Member

    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    R9 290X 3GB

    290, not 290X. Different cards. Was confused for a second there. If you look at the 290X you'll notice it's equal to the 780 Ti here, so 'AMD without a chance' could probably be rephrased to something like...

    AMD's 290X on par with (~£200 more expensive) GTX 780 Ti.
     
  7. CPC_RedDawn

    CPC_RedDawn Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,754
    Likes Received:
    229
    GPU:
    Zotac GTX1080Ti AMP
    Funny because I just got done beating the game and my fps was awesome on an OC'd 7970 it never dipped below 60fps with two settings turned down a little notch.

    True this engine is a piece of crap and was built around Nvidia's CUDA tech but still I had a blast with this game on AMD.

    Please god stop trolling!
     
  8. -Tj-

    -Tj- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    16,504
    Likes Received:
    1,534
    GPU:
    Zotac GTX980Ti OC
    at only 512 compressed no doubt.. But at 8192 or 16384 compressed it doesnt have such obvious artifacts + less streaming in general since its storing larger texture pages when you turn around.
     
  9. Nirvana91

    Nirvana91 Active Member

    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    7950 @ 1210/1500
    Playing maxed out with a 280X.
     
  10. Warhammertx

    Warhammertx Member

    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Powercolor R9-290
    So much drama over a 5.00 bargain bin game in 6 months
     

  11. TeGarchoFF

    TeGarchoFF Member

    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ASUS GTX 1070 Turbo
    Could this be the best multi-threaded optimized game out there? Take a look at this after a short run through the first part:

    [​IMG]

    Trying not to spoil anything here, it's very early in the game, when you're in the first bunker. Look at the cpu core usage, it's even in all 8 cores. Can someone confirm this?
     
  12. -Tj-

    -Tj- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    16,504
    Likes Received:
    1,534
    GPU:
    Zotac GTX980Ti OC
    Yes it goes higher when you use higher max PPF..

    Also its higher with jobthread=8 command, default can use 2-3cores.
     

Share This Page