Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by GaRd3NiA, Jan 16, 2006.
9550XT and 6200, which one is better???
cause i m looking for an old and cheap card, 9550XT and 6200 price is quite similar in my country...
6600 is a bit out of budget...
6200 is the better
One more vote for 6200. I think it will be better in Direct3D and Opengl will be even better.
any 6200 user here??
can play NFSMW??
what is a 9550xt? I have heard of a 9550 but with the XT bit on the end?
Anyway the 6200 is the better card of the two.
If you see XT on the end of a ATi card, its tuned up; more faster, etc. If its NV its not-so a good version.
I dont even know. As for me I'd go with ATI because i know my friend has 9600XT which is kinda like 9550 and it runs perfect.
Please, R9550 is nowhere near R9600 Pro or XT.
R9550 is not even better than good old R9500 Pro. Higher number doesn't mean higher performance.
Take GeForce 6200 without thinking.
if a modable 9800SE compare to 6200??
which is better??
difinitely 9800SE... The only situation 6200 will win over 9800SE is when playing SM 3.0 ONLY. It is because 9800SE dont support it. But with SM 2.0 and lower... 9800SE is superior nad 6200, 6200-TC...
if modable 9800SE wif 6600 non-GT??
ATI 9800SE difinitely... ATI 9xxx cards do well on DX9 games not like their FX counterpart. Even with 6200, 6200-TX, 6600 vanilla. ATI 9800SE is still superior...
9800se most likely will. The 6600 non gt is a joke of a card and loses to the 9800pro in all games.
Ya thats what im saying on other post. 6600 just depends on pipelines and some technology (SM 3.0). But performance, i still like the 5700ULTRA (last version with gddr3 mem) and up, compare to 6600 vanilla.