That's what the testing presets are for, everyone's already using the testing presets, so it's all comparable as long as you pay attention to the presets used.
That's great, impressive to see a 1080ti with all those cores at such a high core clock, combined with low voltage & low temperatures! Do you have a golden sample, or is that just average?
Over the average for sure, not a Golden one...or at least cannot tell as the card is Power limited on the stock cooler over here with 330w MSI +117% Limit
Ah, right, sucks that it's power limited because temperatures are excellent and looks like there might be a fraction of performance left. Am I right in thinking you could flash the vBIOS from another 1080ti that has a higher power limit?
Tried the GB Aurus BIOS with 375w max Power Limit was a disaster for my MSI card...just did a liquid metal shunt mod and now even in warmer condition exceeded 80fps in 4k
Well that's good, I can see it boosting to 2100Mhz now, is that the limit now? Score wise you got 1% more performance, I suppose there's not really much more to be gained on a practical level, it's not like you're gonna get another 100Mhz out of it.
Here are my results: for 1080 high settings - for 1080 medium - A few bugs i found out for my computer: My i5 6600k is overclocked at 4,5 Ghz, but reported as stock from Unigine ? My RX 480 is clocked at 1338 Mhz and during any other GPU benchmark MSI Afterburner displays 1338 Mhz stable, but during the Unigine Superposition fluctuates between 1220 and 1330 Mhz..What gives?
Score is not too far behind you guys also stock CPU not playing any PC games currently. GPU did get a little hot c:
Everything else seems to work on my computer, except this. Gets no further than the launcher. Maybe it hates Xeon cpu's
If you're running anything like RTSS in the background I have it straight from unigen that the program doesn't like it try turning anything the records/reports FPS off and see if that makes a difference
Gotta say my 290x@1100/1500 is holding pretty strong, RX 580 who?:grin: 1080p med: 8958 1080p high: 6430 1080p extr: 2792 4K: 3941 8k: 774
Yup. Here is the medium preset result, which is the only one where the program indicates that I am not VRAM limited. http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=5419262&postcount=14 It's interesting that performance doesn't tank super hard on my "High" preset though, while still being over the limit, and that almost by the same amount of VRAM (as in extreme)... 1.3GB... I think the step from shaders "high" to "extreme" is what kills it...
