Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by Infiniti3D, Oct 23, 2009.
Thats about the same as my 560 score.
my 480 stock,driver default no vsync
860/1050 1.08v max 83c run x5
925 core clock/1850 shader clock/4400 memory clock
for some reason i couldnt get it any higher without it crashing. so im guessing anything beyond that needs a voltage tweak.
Tested with all whistles and bells... 8xAA...
Unfortunately a second Avalanche wont fit in my case... on the other hand... it saves me money...
Heaven Benchmark v2.5 Basic
This is with my 560 @ 975/2400
Max setting 8xAA 16xAF Normal Tes
Has going to 2.5 caused anyone else to have lower scores. My FPS went down by somewhere around 10 fps.
What about extreme run?
My extreme run, all stock clock.
Mine stock clocks/voltages, default settings.
Here's a maxed out extreme run
it makes my gpu cry even more lol... but it looks a little nicer compared to 2.0, it has better Ambient Occlusion.
its something with texture streaming and engine acts kinda strange with min fps, by V2.1 i got min: 10fps vs 36-37fps by 2.0 >> this min fps is right before the first bridge when it blurs the fence up close and shows that distant floating city in the back,.. well with V2.1 it was 31-32fps same spot, so this strange drop must have happened somewhere in the beginning..i didnt see any lags to 10fps though..
2.5 isn't affected like that, but yea it has bigger impact by that blurring scene that's the min fps by me now 28.7fps at 1024 reso..
1 more max
thehunter how are you getting d3d11 on a 250gts !!!!! (sorry wrong pic):biggun:
lol because i can
didn't you notice there is no tessellation though, so yea it doesnt really matter :nerd:
Stock everything very happy today
Stock everything still very happy today
Less Extreme Result:
Heaven does not detect my 6950 but my GT240 for PhysX. The bench has been made with the 6950 of course.