Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by MfA, Mar 4, 2013.
So what did you get ?
I dont have the game yet, though here is a fine specimen
email@example.com, 16GB Ram, 2xGigabyte Titans
2560x1600, Ultimate settings, 2xSSAA
WOW, 2 titans. guess it willl run at 20fps for me on my 580
I think, its because TressFX enabled on high. With TressFX disable optimization great.
I think its supersampling AA fault, this thing is a killer in any game atm.
Check SleepingDogs, SniperElite v2, TheWitcher2,..
its clear if you enable SSAA ( 2 or 4x ) at 2560x1600 + all max setting , this will be normal ( then we dont know if the SLI profile is ready ).. FXAA could be enabled anyway.
surely the point of the benchmark would be to do it at the same settings as everyone else?
ie, 1080p ultimate
33.6, up 1fps from when I did it 10 hours ago.
Those are mine benchmarks results/ Catalyst 13.2 beta7:
1080p, Vsync On, Ultimate settings (tFX On) -
1080p, Vsync On, Ultra settings (tFX Off) -
Note, difference between Ultra and Ultimate = tFX On/ Off
IMO, despite the fact that the tFX looks really cool and awesome though with unnecessary performance hit at medium range graphics cards (not optimazed build/ drivers?) ... the game has a very not cool (unpleasant) way to implement how the hairs rendered on Lara (NPC's) - they do not lie on the shoulders of the characters, but it lies over the invisible boundaries (3d mesh) of the body - not cool, not cool at all...this one little flaw make this feature kinda defective...because it is there and you can see it all the time while playing...
PS. If anyone found out what the "high precision" function do, pls let me know ? It costs me 4-8 FPS with tFX=Off and I don't see any differences ...very appreciated for any help here.
1080p, ultimate, no TressFX, 2xSSAA
1080p, ultimate, with TressFX, 2xSSAA
what's the point in benching with Vsync on?
Well, in this case the point is in "tFX" feature FPS comparison
Ultimate settings...FXAA, triple buffering, tFX on, 1920x1080
Ultimate, FXAA, trip buff, tFX off, 1920x1080
HD 6990 Ultra and Ultimate (TressFX Off in Ultra and On in Ultimate)
1920x1080 and 5992x1080 Eyefinity with Bezel Compensation :
I think there is some thing wrong for me.
Ultra AA off
I get 48fps with 4xSSAA and 49fps with no AA. I thought the SSAA was like Ubersampling in the Witcher 2? or am I wrong?
Upgraded from 2x 4870 to 2x 7970 on old system works well
Setting on ULTIMATE 1080p
qx9650 @ 4.02ghz w/ m80 corsair cooler
Sapphire 7970 in CS @ 1050/1500
8GB Ram @ 1600 (stock)
hey jeffokada81 are your video cards both ATI GHZ edition cards or are you just over clocking them normal 7970? i'm looking at getting something to replace my 5870 after this game crushed my video card and your setup looks promising.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
I flashed the GHZ edition firmware onto my reference cards. You may see artifacts in some games. I didnt have any problems in Crysis3, minor artifacts in BF3 and alot in Dead Space 3. None in Tomb Raider =)
I just use CCC to turn the clocks back to 925/1050 when video starts to get too annoying.
btw, i was able to find both cards for $350 each if you look hard enough
All this talk about overclocking, I went on and changed my clocks to 1100/1800 with +4% on power limit and I got a max 129 fps on the bench. 7fps increase for a slight tweak aint bad. =) (using msi after burner. Trixx is garbage)
resize the images in your post to max 1280px width pls..
edit: lol morbias've already done that, while i was typing! :infinity: