Discussion in 'Games, Gaming & Game-demos' started by morbias, Jun 30, 2016.
is a 750m enough to run this title ?
I think it just about matches the minimum requirement (GTX 560). So it should be possible with the right reso/settings.
oki, thank you, my friend has an Asus N750jv, so hopefully it will be all right. Thank you for the quick reply
check this out:
scroll down for benchmarks part. Apparently even 750M can struggle so it is indeed a minimum spec.
mpff... bloody game, in deed
1366 x 768 and then a 850m needed
Yea this game is GPU heavy, I've seen GPU usage hit 99 % often (Ultra+, 1080p60, vsync).
The best benchmark imo isn't the benchmark itself... it's running around in the Stuyvesant area (the parks, etc).
That's the one place my 1080GTX "tanks" to sub 100 fps on 1080p.
On my part i have chosen 2560/1600 (DSR) 1920/1200 native. Almost all on max, 1116Mhz on the sli. Dips above 43 fps averaging 52. always 98% on the GPU and the benchmarck says 28%, which taskmanager confirms in game.
Oho, interesting, also according to eyecandy settings we want ...
ill stick there in TIER 5 to piment the thing(im 2 atm)
Yea the Stuyvesant area seems to be the toughest part, only place where I get fps drops as well from otherwise locked 60 fps.
The benchmark is an indication of in game performance in general though.
I will have my Gaming X early next week, what resolution you are playing at ? can you describe your experience for me ?
Stupid Question...I bought only the main game when it came out and played in the beginning for some time but lost interest as single Player bored me a lot..many month have passed..so....is it worth playing again even without a season pass ??
I'm playing at 1080p and I'm hitting mostly 100+ fps, often even well beyond. Not everything is maxed out though, but most of it is. Stuyvesant is just a very specific area on the map where framerate is lower then general. Probably due to more vertex's being loaded (lot's of fences and small complex stuff).
Volumetric Fog is a framerate hog at a very little increase in image quality so I turned that down.
BF1 runs at +120 fps all the time, Ultra except anti-aliasing in 1080p, excluding a specific map where there was a bug that tanks everyones framerate, not just mine. The map was fine before they patched the game.
But don't look at me for a 4K example, I'm more of a gameplay/latency/fluidity/high fps kind of person. In MP FPS's I will even prefer playing 720p, if it's required to keep my fps above 120 at all times.
Ok thank you
yes it is a good choice personnally i go for eyecandy as much as i can, the opposite direction though.
oki Thanx again
Soooo... UPlay down ?
For me too...
Yea, Ubisoft service not available at the moment...
guessing people went nuts with AC3
EDIT: got online now, keep trying peeps!
Yup online aswell :banana:
And now UPlay crashed and the game with it... also got Division services unavailable error once.
So think I'm done for today, game seems too crash prone atm for Survival runs. Got the DLC ok though
Server extinction again in a dozen of minutes ...