Discussion in 'Game Tweaks and Modifications' started by TheWorse, Jul 9, 2014.
This is only 0.99 with max. settings and temporal smaa?
4k res + 2txaa. And if someone asks, no, resolution and antialiasing doesn't change graphics. I take my screenshots at high res so I don't get jaggies.
I have txaa, smaa and temporal smaa and then only msaa 2x and so on... How I can choose 2txaa?
I meant txaa x2
If anyone wants to take screenshots of your tweaks/mods without Aiden you can do so in normal camera without using a cheat trainer/program. Just have Aiden face a tall object that's as high or higher than him like a wall, sign, or even a tree trunk. Then swing the mouse left or right until Aiden goes off the screen. It's for a limited area of rotation but you can adjust Aiden's position and re-swing the mouse to get the screenshot you need.
Yes I know but I have only AA off, txaa, smaa, temporal smaa, msaa 2x, msaa 4x and msaa 8x.
I don't have txaa x2 option.
TheWorse, where do i write -disablepagefilecheck line? What file, which place.... ?
I wont to try if this helpm on my system i any way.
Here you have a better explanation and other tweaks to do in order to get more performance.
And about antialiasing I have txaa 2x and 4x. Only available with nvidia cards
Does forcing tessellation on a AMD/ATI Radeon improve the graphics? I'm doing so with my 7950 but not sure I see any changes, maybe it doesn't work. And wondering the same for Nvidia cards.
As I know, tesselation is already into the game and available for amd/nvidia cards. No mod can increase/decrease or change anything about the tesselation in the game though.
For me the best is temporal smaa.
I made some testing today.
0.97c + all max. + temp. smaa and I get some stuttering so it's not smooth.
0.97c + all max. + high textures + temp. smaa and all is smooth.
0.97c + Maldo + all max. + temp. smaa and it's better than first option but stutters too.
0.97c + Maldo + all max. + high textures + temp. smaa is smooth like in second option but graphics are better because of Maldo.
Without Maldo and high textures the game use 2.5GB of vram.
With Maldo and high textures it's using 3GB.
The only problem with Maldo is AA.
I was testing high vs ultra textures with the MalDo patch and I can assure anyone that I didn't see any difference in quality at all. But I did experience stutter and performance issues as well. Only when I run at a res higher than 1080p.
Which in conclusion I can play the game smooth and with high fps when using high (ultra) textures, 1440p and txaa x2.
Both screenshots are zoomed in and both are on the same settings.
First is without Maldo and second is with Maldo textures.
Maldo has better textures than Vanilla but AA is bad with Maldo.
Are you sure ?
The 99 looks sweet, great work.
0.99 screenshots are:
Outstanding! / Fatality! like
and i think the High / Ultra (without texture mods) are good enough too, while the Performance stands fluid (playing on 24" lcd @ fhd)
Pretty sure. Tesselation is controlled directly from the engine, not by one command telling the game how much tesselation to apply.
High textures with MalDo are pretty much ultra, but after some more testing ultra is a bit better so I'll keep using ultra
Because MalDo textures are higher quality, sharper which translates into a bit of aliasing that can be really reduced anyways. I don't really see jaggies with temporal smaa at 1440p or 2x txaa.
The problem is getting the toksvig to work on the textures is much more complicated in Ubisofts Light Model to efficiently reduce AA.
One approach i had but it fails in the distance
Though it better maintains the sharpness compared to TXAA and the 1080p result looks sharper then your 4K result and is obviously much much faster
So what are you trying to do, discredit him?