Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Oct 3, 2014.
I can also make Minecraft look cool when i resize to 640 x 480.
Why not proper High Res Shots?
By the time this game comes out, hopefully 980Ti should be available or maybe 990 with 6gb vram.
How many games have people said that about already, only to be proven wrong? It reminds me of those people who claim the world is going to end every year, if they guess enough times they'll eventually be right. You don't know anything, you're speculating. We wont have a clue until the game is out, and when it is out you can guarantee it'll run just fine on 4gb cards.
Yea, a 980 will not cut it for me at 1440p, maybe 2x980 with 8gb vram will do the trick, but GM200(or whatever the name will be) would be better. :nerd:
Rofl looks exactly like witcher 2.
So annoying right.. OMG IT'S COMING OUT ON 8GB, NEEDS 10GB VRAM AT 960p WTFFFF MAN.. ALL UPGRADE ROFL, seriously.
Calm down with your VRAM crap guys. 4GB will be more than enough, as is with mordor. Unless you're running 4k ofc.
4GB at 1080p? I don't think so.
SLI you said many of us know this already, how lol, have you played the game?
I guess they've already been brainwashed by the Witcher 3 hype, ****ing ironic if you ask me. XD
I wonder if reporting people with vram dyslexia as trolls would be appropriate. It always starts a f*cking argument. It's plain bait. Not what this forum needs at all.
Don De Vram, i like it.
I can tell from watching a 5Gb video file and it looks amazing. What's with the negative bullchit? You sound like one of those people on YouTube making negative comments about every game, movie or musician.. Chill the hell out.
Download the video and see for yourself. Right click link and "save target as".
Length:37 minutes 1 second
Format:1920 x 1080 (19731 bitrate)
FPS: 60 fps
Size: 5352.88 MB
Link to the page. Chose the European link and save to your computer to watch.
haha lol, sli should be named that, would be ****ing awesome, he's the king of all vram XD
I guess without having to stream and buffering would look much better.
Personally don't give a **** unless it looks as good as witcher 2, has some improvement to the mechanisms and is at least as good in the writing department.
How many proof do u want ?
Dude the evil within is another example, when the time comes, i wanne make a bet with u, that u need more then 4 gb vram for ultra or mega textures in this game, u cant slowdown technologie, u can try, but u wont come far.
Most of your post was illegible. Regardless, I suspect you're asking about how much proof I want? Anything at all would be a good start, you know something other than heavily modified games (exceptions to the rule), and broken ports? I don't take worthless speculation regarding unreleased titles as evidence either, remember when you claimed Shadow of Mordor needed 6GB of VRAM?
U say that to everything broken ports, this is almost starting to be funny
Anyway we will see who is right when the time comes.
As I said, when you guess about a game requiring more than 4gb of VRAM enough times you'll eventually be right. I suspect you'd keep rambling about it for another year if it took that long. You do not know how much a game will require until it is released, you cannot speculate on it. You can't even gauge by system requirements, as has been proven by Shadow of Modor. You claim I say everything is a broken port, that's outright false. It's a strawman created because you have nothing to say other than "I'm right you're wrong!" when you don't have one iota of evidence to back up your words. It's tiresome, I'm sick of it and half the forum is sick of it.
I find it shocking that you and your little group are getting away with what is essentially fear-mongering. Trying to convince people that cards with ridiculous amounts of V-RAM are needed for games that aren't even released is ridiculous, you have no idea. It's hot air, nothing more or less.
I'm done, sick and tired of it.
If u getting sick of it, thats your problem not mine.
Like i sayed before i could be wrong and u could be right, or i could be right and u could be wrong.
Guess I'm a vram troll too lol. Thing is, I'm gaming at 1440p for almost 3 years and it became an obsession for me like 1 year ago when I started to feel the 2GB limitation (several games, Crysis 3, Bf4, Batman AO, Metro LL, Skyrim to name a few) especially since I like to pump at the very least 2x MSAA.
While I can't say out of experience that 4GB is/is not enough today, I simply don't want to repeat a mistake. When I got my 680 Lightnings in 2012, almost everbody was saying that 2GB is enough (again, 1440p), however it only lasted for about a year. So I would rather get a card(s) with more than the current standard, which seems to be 4GB, just for the sake of not being pissed again 1 year from now that it's again not enough... which might, or might not be the case. :O
U should be fine with 4 gb vram on witcher 3 unles u are going to use MSAA up to 8x or any other crazy textures that use more then that, or Ultra HD with MSAA
It's not opinions it's the truth.
+I'm sure you won't be right lol.
Ignore these vram mongers guys, get reporting.
haha lol eclap has a point
Eclap how many you got already? I got 15 and counting.