Star Wars Battlefront Beta Graphics card VGA performance benchmark review

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Oct 7, 2015.

  1. GeniusPr0

    GeniusPr0 Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    RTX 2080
    AMD wins!

    Really regretting my 980 purchase.
     
  2. MBTP

    MBTP Member Guru

    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    Sapphire RX590
    Hilbert, you will post FCATS from Fury X and Titan X?
    Very tempted to know if HBM is making a diference in 4k
    :p
     
  3. Turanis

    Turanis Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,478
    Likes Received:
    218
    GPU:
    Gigabyte RX500
    Mr. Hilbert you have been tempted to bench R9 290/390X & Gtx 970/980 to an 1050 MHz clock gpu and vram at 6000MHz? :D
    Mean all these cards to be tested at that clock,obvious the Gtx downclocked a bit.
    For the sake of testing these cards. :)
     
  4. Fox2232

    Fox2232 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,939
    Likes Received:
    2,292
    GPU:
    5700XT+AW@240Hz
    I finally got into game (did not have time). If I had to compare it to Jedi Knight: Outcast/Jedi Academy, I would rather play Jedi Academy multiplayer as that was no-BS, straight to action with much better customization of gear and skills.

    This really just feels like BF4 without camuflage and with poor weapons... I mean damn slow projectile blasters.
    And I forgot: 1080p - Ultra details everywhere + TAA = 100~145fps in match.
    Visuals are good, movement feels smooth. But I am unimpressed by game itself.
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2015

  5. Denial

    Denial Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    12,565
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080Ti
    Hilbert I'd like to see the 980Ti tested at 1203/7101 in an inverted case with silver trim. I'd also like to see the FCAT differences between that and a Geforce 256 with the 980Ti graph preferably in a muted goldenrod color.

    I'm kind of excited I get to play this game today.
     
  6. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,508
    Likes Received:
    960
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    What would be the point of that? While he is at it why not limit the number of shaders in the GCN cards to the number of cuda cores in the GTX equivalent cards? See I can make requests that make no sense too.
     
  7. Batboy

    Batboy Member

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA Geforce Titan X Hyb.
    ****ty performance from my 980!
     
  8. Batboy

    Batboy Member

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA Geforce Titan X Hyb.
    Since the times of Jedi Academy I didn't see any other game of the franchise being impressive too. I suppose that this game is only about eye candy.
     
  9. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,112
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    I wanna see gm200 reduced ROP count to 64 and disable 2.5gb of vram on the 980 ti.
     
  10. Juliuszek

    Juliuszek Member Guru

    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    GTX1060/3GB
    On HIGH details (not ultra) it works good on:
    GTX 680 (overclocked: +100 CORE +100 MEM)
    i7 3770k (overclocked to 4.2 GHz)
    8GB RAM
    G-sync monitor
     

  11. tsunami231

    tsunami231 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,942
    Likes Received:
    419
    GPU:
    EVGA 1070Ti Black
    i think it looks terrible on ps4, then again my standards for graphics are much higher then what most ps4 games can do. MGS:GZ and MGS:pP are only games that come close to those standards. I hate to see how it run on my pc system though
     
  12. applejack

    applejack Master Guru

    Messages:
    589
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    GTX 1070 GAMING X
    so I've been testing this game's antialiasing and to me it seems they have an awful bug!

    whatever you choose for AntiAliasing - OFF/FXAA/TAA, it still looks like FXAA.

    when I edit the settings file "ProfileOptions_profile." I see the affected line is GstRender.AntiAliasingPost.
    there's also GstRender.AntiAliasingDeferred (which is MSAA) but this one doesn't seem to work either.

    however there's another one named GstRender.AntiAliasing which defaults at 3, and isn't available in game menu.
    setting this to 0 disables FXAA. and guess what - setting it to 4 results in actual Temporal AA ! image is less sharp but no jaggies whatsoever !
    I'm betting they confused GstRender.AntiAliasingPost with GstRender.AntiAliasing.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2015
  13. Monchis

    Monchis Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    36
    GPU:
    GTX 950
    At least is no placebo when I see some 30fps ps4 games running at 60fps on the 660. Excuse me for knowing the capabilities of the 660 better than you guys.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2015
  14. siriq

    siriq Master Guru

    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    Evga GTX 570 Classified
    So some numbers. I am talking about multiplayer with 40 slots full. GTX 570 1080p low: 100-130 fps, medium around 100 and high 80-100 fps . I haven't tried ultra settings yet. I bet i will be around 50 easy.

    So i did i quick run at ultra settings and 1080p. FPS between 50-80. Hilbert should make an new bench ASAP.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2015
  15. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    12,498
    Likes Received:
    1,948
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    So you actually getting a higher fps with a gtx570 than gtx960? Impossible. Is this another miracle card like Monchis's 660?

    Im seeing 1.8gb+ Vram usage on Ultra, how do you do it with 1.2gb?
     

  16. siriq

    siriq Master Guru

    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    Evga GTX 570 Classified
    Well, i am not sure what Hilbert measured, but this is what i see in the top right corner. I was kinda happy for it. :banana: Anyway. Many users report much higher fps what we see in this bench article.

    670 OC reporting back at high 80+ fps. Didn't say the max.7870 ultra minimum 40 fps . All at FHD. 960 75-80 fps at ultra. It could be because of the FOV. No one play's at 55 FOV.

    So the whole concept to measure the vga-s at 55 FOV is kinda , sorry not kinda but absolute misleading.
    If i got time i will do some test at 55 FOV :D
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2015
  17. fantaskarsef

    fantaskarsef Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,259
    Likes Received:
    3,314
    GPU:
    2080Ti @h2o
    Wow, if that's true it would be increadible. My 580 probably couldn't push more than 30 to 50 fps on ultra in BF4.
     
  18. Ryu5uzaku

    Ryu5uzaku Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,791
    Likes Received:
    118
    GPU:
    5700 XT UV 1950~
    Tbh 570, 660 and 950 are pretty similar in terms of numbers 660 ti being bit faster. So the cards should be almost comparable to HH 45 fps on fullhd.
     
  19. Andrew LB

    Andrew LB Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,081
    Likes Received:
    148
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 1080@2,025

    The PS4 is roughly as fast as an R7-265 which is 1,843 flops.

    The GTX 770 (aka GTX 680) pushes over 3,000 and is almost twice as powerful as a PS4. Overclock it a bit and it easily hits over 3,500.


    Also, you don't need 8gb ram to run this game. Here is the Potato Masher in all it's $350 glory running 1080p/60 at medium settings on a GTX 760.

     
  20. Cave Waverider

    Cave Waverider Master Guru

    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    49
    GPU:
    GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
    I hope MSAA will be supported in the final game (and joysticks, too).
     

Share This Page