SSE & Physx*

Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce' started by Black Mesa, Aug 26, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,111
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    It takes a great man to report himself. Props!
     
  2. Black Mesa

    Black Mesa Banned

    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 560SE 1gb
    So then why are you guy's still trying to refute and blatantly ignore the fact that over 100 games use ( SSE "CPU" based Physics ) and less than 25 games use ( nvidia "GPU" Physx* ) ? Then you ignore the fact that SSE based Physics overshadow GPU Physx* at the very leased buy a ratio of 4:1 and that's an extremely ultra conservative estimate.
     
  3. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,784
    Likes Received:
    1,135
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    Lets see 100% of all PC users have a *gasp* CPU. (you still following me) About 25-30% of all PC users have Nvidia based GFX. (are you still there) Yep sounds about right . Of course CPU based physics is going to be more popular every users has a PC that can on some level use it.
     
  4. sykozis

    sykozis Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    21,791
    Likes Received:
    1,051
    GPU:
    MSI RX5700
    There's 20 established physics engines (not including custom build physics engines) that are designed to be run on the CPU using either x87, MMX, 3DNow or SSE whereas only 2 of those physics engines support OpenCL or CUDA. There's a very good reason why there are more games using "CPU physics", aside from the fact it's existed far longer.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2012

  5. Black Mesa

    Black Mesa Banned

    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 560SE 1gb
    Every gamer that would want to run and or be interested in physics algorithms in there games they like to play would also own a GPU. At any rate we are digressing far to much so lets keep it on the topic at hand please.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2012
  6. Noisiv

    Noisiv Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,475
    Likes Received:
    961
    GPU:
    2070 Super

    Apparently he even went to report himself.

    Go figure... I have never-ever seen that

    There is a TOPIC? Where?

    "SSE based Physics"? LOL
     
  7. Black Mesa

    Black Mesa Banned

    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 560SE 1gb
    Care to enlighten me as to why in you're opinion there are more games using "CPU physics" than GPU Physx*.
     
  8. Alasander

    Alasander Active Member

    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Asus Geforce 680GTX
    we arent refuting it, we honestly dont give a toss, if it's CPU or GPU physics it dont matter as long as it works, why does it matter.

    you are the only one who seems to have a hard on for this subject.
     
  9. Ade 1

    Ade 1 Master Guru

    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Gigabyte GTX 690
    Agreed.
     
  10. sykozis

    sykozis Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    21,791
    Likes Received:
    1,051
    GPU:
    MSI RX5700
    How bout you try actually reading my entire post...
     

  11. HeavyHemi

    HeavyHemi Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,963
    Likes Received:
    963
    GPU:
    GTX1080Ti
    He just answered that "There's 20 established physics engines (not including custom build physics engines) that are designed to be run on the CPU using either x87, MMX, 3DNow or SSE whereas only 2 of those physics engines support OpenCL or CUDA. There's a very good reason why there are more games using "CPU physics", aside from the fact it's existed far longer.


    Maybe you won't miss it this time.

    Edit: reduced text size from 7 so as to not induce a migraine.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2012
  12. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,111
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
  13. Black Mesa

    Black Mesa Banned

    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 560SE 1gb
  14. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,784
    Likes Received:
    1,135
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    So you don't own a 2500K okay so you're a troll and a proven liar.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2012
  15. IKnowJack

    IKnowJack Member Guru

    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX470
    http://physxinfo.com/
    just go here if u want a list of physx supported games...and which ones run CPU physx and which ones run GPU physx...simple enough..
     

  16. Spets

    Spets Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    157
    GPU:
    RTX 3090
    So you want to compare CPU based physics, which includes a lot of PhysX titles that run on the CPU, to GPU PhysX.
    I think it's adorable you try to twist things in your favor.
     
  17. biggi_

    biggi_ Master Guru

    Messages:
    364
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX770 4GB SLI
    Hey bro,
    Why are you asking about PhysX? It's a scam remember? http://semiaccurate.com/2010/07/07/n...les-physx-cpu/ to quote you from my post :) oh wait....that's an old inaccurate article from Charlie Douchebag from "SEMI ACCURATE" hmmm not going to believe it. And now here you are posting asking about it and trolling everyone here. So is PhysX just a scam or is it good? I'm waiting for enlightenment :stewpid:
     
  18. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,784
    Likes Received:
    1,135
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    He has been given that link multiple times and in one thread said that it was untrue.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page