I am guessing you had DLSS on which reduces temps because power consumption is around 300W or you are CPU bottlenecked with your xeons
No that is exactly what your supposed to get on a real PC Gaming benchmark with a RTX 4090.The reason you got 44 FPS instead of 47 I said is because of DSR settings. YOU SIR HAVE A NORMAL RTX 4090 AND NOT SPECIAL MAGIC COOLING AND CLOCKS RTX 4090 GPU.
I have flashed to the 600W BIOS https://www.3dmark.com/pr/1845775 Barely an improvement in this benchmark
You have a normal RTX 4090 that is on AIO ,leave BIOS as intended. Unless your just trying for E-peen scores on a useless benchmark then I can respect that 100% and I hope you can hit top 10.GOOD LUCK.
I stand corrected. I was going to explain how it was done on two cards, but never mind Have a good evening
That's really strange, your results are way higher. I don't understand the consumption graph, is that combined or single? Either way, 300W isn't much. I'll have to try that benchmark. 226W I think I am about 40c or less. Portal Royal is a benchmark that would tell your GPU temp as well if you have it (shows in the report) while putting the card at 450W+.
WTF are you lying your assoff.Your RTX 4090 is not getting the numbers you are showing.You do not have a RTX 4090 better than everyone on the internet with RTX 4090 by 38%+. Come on dude stop the BS. I even predicted the Cyberpunk numbers the dude would get with RTX 4090 at 3100 MHz on the core,then you come in almost 40% faster lol He is lying or does not understand how to benchmark and probably needs pictures like working at mc donalds.
No idea, I just reran it. 44.65FPS avg. 51.6c max, 63.3c hotspot. Fan at 100%. Board power draw 546W. He is limited to PCI-e Gen3 so I would assume he would be about 1-3% slower in all benchmarks, and maybe up to 8% in esports.
Your benchmark is correct his score is not.Simple as that.He does not have a magic RTX 4090 I ran the same test weeks ago this is what I got and others have got the same FPS
You might want to read a bit slower. He's mentioned multiple times he has two 4090s. You can force SLI on using an old hack, it'll be slower over the PCI-E bus than with a bridge, but still considerably faster than a single card.
I posted a chart with single card scores and he replied with So reading slower turns the reply into two cards awesome
Venturi has two 4090s. The game probably utilizes either DX12 MGPU or the Auto SLI Diff hack, which explains the scores. Scaling doesn't seem to be all that great anyhow. I'm definitely curious on how he got both cards to work. Nevermind him, I'd love to see how using two 4090s is done. This is supposed to be a hardware enthusiast site/forum after all.
I see. Your profile still says you have an RTX 3080 so I didn't know you had two of these beasts, too. Sorry. Anyway, he may have done something different than you, so I'd be curious what that may be. Perhaps the hardware configuration plays into it as well.
Back in the 4090 Business. I've managed to order myself a Gigabyte 4090 Gaming OC yesterday (you need to be fast like the Flash if you want to have one for a somewhat reasonable price here in Germany). This is my second try after the Asus and I hope this one will be okay (at least with bearable or better almost none coil whine).
Rank 11 worldwide https://www.3dmark.com/sw/65142 +212/+1600 Perfect clock (lack of) throttling 600W liquid bios
Let's compare thoughts once you get it. I'll get mine today so will do some testing and comparison with the Asus TUF I currently have. Still bummed that the CableMod 12VHPWR cable takes forever to deliver. They were really quick to send it from their factory (took only three days) but now I've waited since the 19th Oct for it to arrive at the EU facility where it will be forwarded to me (which will take an additional time).
Ok.. Tested A BUNCH of Nvidia adapters. Including ones I've INTENTIONALLY damaged and mounted with < 30mm bend radius and none of them have melted. : nvidia (reddit.com)