Rocket Lake-S presentation leaks: Core i9-11900K outperforms Ryzen 9 5900X in gaming (according to Intel)

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Mar 11, 2021.

  1. kapu

    kapu Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    601
    GPU:
    Radeon 6800
  2. Dragam1337

    Dragam1337 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,326
    Likes Received:
    2,034
    GPU:
    Rtx 3090 Strix OC
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2021
    EspHack, PrMinisterGR and BlindBison like this.
  3. ViperAnaf

    ViperAnaf Master Guru

    Messages:
    404
    Likes Received:
    125
    GPU:
    ASUS TUF 3080 OC
    Its funny seeing all those AMD fanboys here claiming Intel is lying... AMD is "bending" the numbers every time and after every CPU launch the benchmarks shows it... Usually Intel delivers exactly what it promises, you can love or hate it but thats the truth...
     
  4. tailspin

    tailspin Member

    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    ARES II 6GB
    If they arent showing 1440p or 4k, probably no difference in performance. There goes my plans on upgrading for now, might wait till 12th gen is out. ‍♂️
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2021

  5. kapu

    kapu Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    601
    GPU:
    Radeon 6800
    I think this round was a bit different , actually AMD was on spot with the slides (Both Zen3 and RDNA2).
     
    GSDragoon likes this.
  6. cucaulay malkin

    cucaulay malkin Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,458
    Likes Received:
    1,809
    GPU:
    RTX 3060 Ti
    who cares about slides and geekbenches anyway

    we need an impartial review from Hardware Unboxed ! :D
     
  7. kapu

    kapu Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    601
    GPU:
    Radeon 6800
    we need Guru3d and TPU review :p
     
    fantaskarsef likes this.
  8. cucaulay malkin

    cucaulay malkin Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,458
    Likes Received:
    1,809
    GPU:
    RTX 3060 Ti
    for cpu go to computerbase and purepc,they usually do this the right way - by picking a cpu intensive place over just dropping resolution
    TPU is nice cause it's more like what you can expect in most gpu bound scenarios and they have percentage charts
     
  9. PrMinisterGR

    PrMinisterGR Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,928
    Likes Received:
    793
    GPU:
    Inno3D RTX 3090
    Oh how the turntables.

    This is super interesting, but they should have tested with "Threaded Optimization" to OFF, to see if that affects anything.
     
  10. fantaskarsef

    fantaskarsef Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    12,666
    Likes Received:
    5,094
    GPU:
    2080Ti @h2o
    Exactly that since you shift from a CPU limited scenario towards a GPU limited scenario with higher resolution.
    But to be honest, I will read reviews once they are out in the wild, the rest is just anecdotal to me.
     
    Airbud likes this.

  11. Tuukka

    Tuukka Active Member

    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    Asus GTX660 OC 2 GB
    2nd picture, Massive power.... So does the chart indicate how much more power the new processor takes compared to old one ? o_O
     
  12. brogadget

    brogadget Active Member

    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    25
    GPU:
    2xR9 280x 3GB
    If pricing and availability is okay, you might buy one (+ new mainboard in my case), but imo only for OC fun with TEC cryo cooling (+$$) in mind. A TDP of 125 is quiet a lot for "only" 8 cores. Intel´s aim is taking "Fastest CPU for Gaming Crown" back, but without "real world reviews", nothing is proofen yet. The only advantage Intel still has, is RAM speed and overclocking capabilties in conjunction with maximum heat dissipation, and we all know what this means......
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2021
  13. Trihy

    Trihy Member Guru

    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    23
    GPU:
    Onboard
    It's so sad to see intel trying to appeal to gamers. They were charging extra premium money for oc capabilities for years. Yes, gamers paradise.
     
  14. EspHack

    EspHack Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,709
    Likes Received:
    136
    GPU:
    ATI/HD5770/1GB
    given how tiny these claims are, I bet/hope they are true, otherwise AMD will charge us $399 for a 6core by end of year
     
    PrMinisterGR and GSDragoon like this.
  15. nightwalker342

    nightwalker342 Master Guru

    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 2080 XC
    If you really stop to think about it, when they claim a 3% improvement in a game, lets say it's 103fps VS 100fps, that is well within the margin of error of a test run, and it can drop 6 fps the very next run, so if they run it 1000 times and just one time get that lift in fps, they can claim that it has a 3% increase. Seeing a new CPU and it only has a 3-5% supposed increase over the competition means nothing until these numbers get backed up by 3rd parties who aren't Intel shills, and if that's all they can get for improvement, better be at least able to compete price wise or they're just going to continue to lose more market share. That's one good thing about AMD being able to compete again, they forced the prices to come down a bit, even if they are starting to climb right back up again :(
     

  16. cucaulay malkin

    cucaulay malkin Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,458
    Likes Received:
    1,809
    GPU:
    RTX 3060 Ti
    intel's prices,not their own.
    https://geizhals.de/amd-ryzen-7-5800x-v43019.html
     
  17. deefop

    deefop Member Guru

    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    HiS 7870 + Asus 7870 CF
    Sounds like it's DOA.
    Rocket Lake tops out at 8/16. If it doesn't absolutely smack AMD in ST OR come with insanely competitive pricing, it's hardly even worth talking about much less buying.
     

Share This Page