Review: Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark analysis

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Nov 5, 2019.

  1. Astyanax

    Astyanax Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    8,500
    Likes Received:
    2,855
    GPU:
    GTX 1080ti
    thats not TAA.

    its the game trick used in gta5 to keep performance up.
     
  2. Andy Watson

    Andy Watson Member Guru

    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    55
    GPU:
    960
    I tend to leave them as well, when I don't they can be painful. I did Id's rage from the start, remember the graphics driver issues on that at the start, it ruined it for some people. When stable it was an ok game.

    I have waited to play Far Cry New Dawn as didn't want to pay that amount for something which is a big DLC in effect, finally got it on DVD from Amazon for £16 and playing it now. No issues at all and will keep me happy until this game is debugged by the early adopters.

    When the launcher doesn't work very well even .................... golly....
     
  3. Hyderz

    Hyderz Member Guru

    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    41
    GPU:
    GTX 1070ti
    can only imagine what the numbers will be if DXR is available
     
  4. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,586
    Likes Received:
    8,258
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    The article has been updated - tweaked results added, CPU scaling perf will be included in the next hour.
     
    Netherwind, OnnA, Singleton99 and 2 others like this.

  5. leopr

    leopr Member Guru

    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI 1080Ti OC
    It'd be nice if another 1080Ti user can confirm this.
     
  6. RamGuy

    RamGuy Master Guru

    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    nVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
    If that was so why would it go away when you disable TAA?
     
  7. ObscureangelPT

    ObscureangelPT Master Guru

    Messages:
    545
    Likes Received:
    64
    GPU:
    Zotac GTX 1650 Supe
    It's not that pathetic if people knew the difference between Pascal and Turing and RDNA and GCN.

    Nvidia had cut corners though out this entire series when it came to DX12 and Vulkan, it comes by no surprise that Turing GPUs simple have much better performance, because Turing it's the only arquitechture where Nvidia really cared about low level apis, just check the difference in performance in any single game that uses Vulkan or DX12 between Pascal and equivalent Turing GPUs.

    RDR2 only makes use of Low level APIs, so performance on anything other than any recent GCN (RX 470 or above) RDNA or Nvidia Turing (GTX 1650 or above) will be simply be lower than you usually get under DX11.
    If RDR2 was mainly developed under DX11, Pascal performance would simply be the usual, but with this new APIs it's just going to ramp up the difference from PASCAL to Turing further and further, not even to mention AMD cards that were simply super ready for low-level APIs for half decade and only now are shining on them (check COD MW or Wolfenstein II that only uses low level APIs too and you will see what I'm talking about).

    Cheers
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2019
    jbscotchman likes this.
  8. Hyderz

    Hyderz Member Guru

    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    41
    GPU:
    GTX 1070ti
    rip my 1070ti... but luckily GTA style and Wild West theme are not my thing :) will give this a pass..
     
  9. clamatac

    clamatac Active Member

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    MSI GTX 1070 X
    thanks for the info for the ultrawide resolution!
     
  10. alanm

    alanm Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,843
    Likes Received:
    2,016
    GPU:
    Asus 2080 Dual OC
    Not really. While Turing is indeed is an improvement with low level APIs, Pascal is no slouch for its time, you were more thinking of Maxwell. There are tons of DX12, Vulkan reviews showing Pascal on par with its AMD counterparts and in many cases ahead, even in recent titles.

    https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/gears_of_war_5_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,5.html
    https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/borderlands_3_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,5.html

    Timespy: https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/xfx_radeon_rx_5700_xt_thicc_iii_ultra_review,25.html
     
    Khronikos, toyo and yasamoka like this.

  11. haste

    haste Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    334
    GPU:
    GTX 1080 @ 2.1GHz
    There is something weird going on with Pascal and it's not just the bad performance.

    In this article, 1080TI runs a bit faster on DX12 than on Vulkan, but in GN's video review, their 1080TI runs significantly faster with Vulkan API (97 FPS VULKAN vs 85 FPS DX12).

    This difference might be worth investigating maybe?
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2019
  12. nullptr

    nullptr New Member

    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    2
  13. sunnyp_343

    sunnyp_343 Master Guru

    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    25
    GPU:
    Asus ROG GTX 1080
    300$ console do stable 30 FPS on this game.But 2000$ PC gives 60 FPS with ultra setting,ya i know with little better quality than console but still price Difference is huge.Seems like unoptimise game for pc.
     
  14. RamGuy

    RamGuy Master Guru

    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    nVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
    It's pretty easy. Just enable resolution scaling in the advanced settings. If you are running on a 1080P monitor you set the resolution scaling to 200% which equals 3840x2160 aka 4K and it will render everything in 4K and as your output is only 1080P it will be downscaled to match your monitor's resolution.
     
  15. metagamer

    metagamer Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    692
    GPU:
    Palit GameRock 2080
    You expected too much.
     

  16. Alessio1989

    Alessio1989 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,881
    Likes Received:
    513
    GPU:
    .
    top-level gpu results are a lil weird... all others seems reasonable, system&API noise included.
     
  17. H83

    H83 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,267
    Likes Received:
    698
    GPU:
    MSI Duke GTX1080Ti
    The game is demanding but that´s normal when maxing everything out. If it´s like any other modern game then we can drop the settings to gain 30/40% losing very little on the image quality. The problem for me is that the game apparently is boring as hell so not for me.

    Also the 1080Ti continues to be the best card ever! At least until i get a better one...:p
     
    Irenicus likes this.
  18. IceVip

    IceVip Master Guru

    Messages:
    737
    Likes Received:
    93
    GPU:
    GTX 1080 Ti @ 2050
    Lol ok, my setup is really close to yours.

    R7 1700 locked at 3.8
    4x8 3200 C16
    Crosshair VI Hero
    1080TI Black edition(leans towards grey)

    I did have the same damn error and tried all of the damn fixes, then it randomly hit me that i was on some randomass Beta bios from asus.
    So what i did was i just updated it to the last 1 0 0 3 ABBA aaaaaaaaand voala, it launched with 0 issues.. Works fine, no crashes no stutter no anything. really odd.
     
  19. jasonmvt

    jasonmvt Active Member

    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    RTX 2080Ti
    I'm getting terrible textures, doesn't matter if it's low or ultra. Newest drivers, 2080ti.
     
  20. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,764
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    GN showed that the VRAM is the limiter on the 970. The 570 4GB chugged in this game too but the 580 8GB plays fine at 1080p. BTW he also checked the 980ti performance in the title too. Also went a little more in-depth with the in-game BM vs real game play and came to the conclusion that th BM is actually pretty close to an average performance scenario and that the opening scene of the game is over the top on its performance hit vs the rest of the game.


    Also I wish Hilbert had used Vulcan exclusively. Other sites have shown a 20% performance difference in favor of Vulcan on Nvidia cards.
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2019

Share This Page