Review: Intel Core i5 11400F processor

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Apr 16, 2021.

  1. kapu

    kapu Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,748
    Likes Received:
    426
    GPU:
    Radeon 6800
    Both are maxed out . That 5600X is at it's celling 1966 FCLK + 4750 ALL core = It's the end :D
     
  2. cucaulay malkin

    cucaulay malkin Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,809
    Likes Received:
    876
    GPU:
    107001070
    how do you know about power limits in this video ?
    those numbers look fake as hell
    200% faster ?
     
  3. kapu

    kapu Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,748
    Likes Received:
    426
    GPU:
    Radeon 6800
    Where is 200% faster. It's small gap between them. CS GO is only big i think
     
  4. cucaulay malkin

    cucaulay malkin Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,809
    Likes Received:
    876
    GPU:
    107001070
    right there at the beginning in hitman
    and where does it show power limits
    man this is some russian end of the internet stuff
     

  5. kapu

    kapu Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,748
    Likes Received:
    426
    GPU:
    Radeon 6800
    1% lows yea , that cache difference in favor of ryzen . Not sure if you can feel it during gaming tho . On;ly some games are cache sensitive , i guess Hitman is.
     
  6. cucaulay malkin

    cucaulay malkin Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,809
    Likes Received:
    876
    GPU:
    107001070
    you think 200% difference is due to cache on ryzen ? or even possible between two modern six cores ?




    look at hitman numbers here

    that russian video is just weird.but then again,most russian internet stuff is just fake
     
  7. kapu

    kapu Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,748
    Likes Received:
    426
    GPU:
    Radeon 6800
    It's the rocket lake problem. Cache is worse on them and some review mentioned some games had much worse 0.1% lows than comet lake. I will look it up later, maybe i can find more data
     
  8. Ryu5uzaku

    Ryu5uzaku Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,056
    Likes Received:
    270
    GPU:
    6800 XT
    Intel brought some value with 11xxxF series. They do afford it. Will bring down prices of AMD in future but not when they have a chip shortage.
     
  9. cucaulay malkin

    cucaulay malkin Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,809
    Likes Received:
    876
    GPU:
    107001070
    please do cause it sounds improbable and I never saw it reported anywhere except you and that russian youtube video.
    if they're getting 14fps 1% values where others are getting over 100 then their setup is the problem.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2021
  10. kapu

    kapu Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,748
    Likes Received:
    426
    GPU:
    Radeon 6800
    I checked GN video now and 11400f had much better lows than comet lake . So russians f-ckd something up with OC, resulting in negative performance . Had same with 2000 FCLK on my 5600X , everything seemed stable but performance was lower than 1933 FCLK.

    TPU frametime bench also didn't find anything special.
     

  11. cucaulay malkin

    cucaulay malkin Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,809
    Likes Received:
    876
    GPU:
    107001070
    yup that's what I thought that system is unstable
     
  12. olymind1

    olymind1 Active Member

    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    RX460 2GB
    Or increase power limit and enable vsync (or some other type of fps limiter or sync), so when the game needs more power for cpu intensive parts it would use slightly more, but most of the time it wouldn't use more just when needed.
     
    gx-x likes this.
  13. gx-x

    gx-x Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,482
    Likes Received:
    149
    GPU:
    1070Ti Phoenix
    increasing power limit does the trick, I get ~3600 points in CB20 with my 9700 (non K) it uses ~150W and it reaches up to 74C on some cores. With 9700K in the same system, same power limits (higher than intel spec on both cpus in test) 9700K manages ~3800 since it runs 4.6GHz all core, vs non-K that is running 4.5GHz. Also 9700K (default) was using less power (my sample used ~20W less than non K 9700) and was maxing temps at ~67C (hottest core).
    Same cooling, same system.
    Aside from that, there is no difference between the two and since I don't care if 9700K can be overclocked to ~5.2GHz (overclock that brings very little to no gain gain in fps on sub $300 GPU) I really don't care for the K. That's because I have been overclocking for past 20 years and now I just don't care to waste time for 2~3fps.
     
  14. olymind1

    olymind1 Active Member

    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    RX460 2GB
    Interesting, i mean if i remember correctly Anandtech tested the 10700 vs 10700K and the K also drew less power, probably because it's less faulty binned chip, like in your case.

    By the way i didn't have any K chips and probably never will. I'm not paying extra money for a few hundred MHz. I had an H67 board with i3-2100 went to i5-3550 huge jump, to Ryzen 2600 noticeable jump, but the current pricing on AMD's side not very good, if i want to upgrade i have to pay too much for noticable performance increase in gaming, 2.5-3x price of my cpu for +50% FPS, i would rather go back to intel for an 11400 cpu.
     
    gx-x likes this.

Share This Page