Maybe he looked at the code, like you looked at the architecture. Why is this funny? Did anyone even bring up the FCAT results besides you? I think one other guy did and all he asked was that Hilbert show to 980 cards. Everyone else, including me, probably just read the article and assumed Hilbert was right and that it wasn't a big deal. No one even mentioned the ET article until you did. So why would anyone defend something that was never an issue to begin with? I don't even have an issue with people hating on Nvidia. As I said multiple times, even before you strawmanned my arguments, Nvidia definitely has an Async problem they need to fix. If there is a driver coming, it should have been out already. It's not really acceptable. The thing I do have an issue with is people posting flamebait crap like the first two posts you had in this thread. The "Fanboys" one and the "LOL IMAGE LINK" one. They serve no purpose in the thread other then to provoke people. That's what flamebaiting means. I don't care if you're right, it's how you posted it. The other problem is the crap I quoted on the top of this post. You're asking him to prove something while at the same time, claiming that you know the driver won't add performance because you apparently looked at the architecture and were just somehow able to glean that information from it. Even more amusing is that you say that, right after Ext3h, who is a better source then you, says it's basically all speculation at this point. That's not even to mention your 2019 argument, because apparently you've also looked at the Pascal architecture before anyone else on the entire internet. Honestly, like I said, it's definitely possible that you're correct about everything. But at this point it's just an assumption. And using words like "impossible" is misleading nonsense.