Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Jun 24, 2015.
Its the retailers that do this not nvidia
So let me get this straight. No Dual Link DVI. No HDMI 2.0. And disappointing performance at the same price as a 980Ti (which overclocks like a beast).
Welp, good game AMD. Supposedly their stock is already tumbling. They won't get a chance to recover from this most likely. Such a shame.
disrespectful ?!! I laugh about AMD like many others ? No
This is a very expensive card and many people expected more !
I´m just a realist and not a dreamer.
Ok , talk about one Benchmark, very informative.
As i said not a bad card but way overpriced.
Too each his own,.
Im out, peace !
No idea why they didn't increase the ROP count in line with the SP count.....Could have made all the difference.
Anyhow so we wait now for 14/16mm and we just keep getting older.
Its the 2900 all over again.
Price will soon go down I'm sure. If they want to sell any. If its $550, it could even become popular. AMD would live up to its value for money image, but probably wont make much money off it.
AMD needs to drop the price by at least $100 to have any impact. Unless you just refuse to buy Nvidia for what ever reason nobody would ever buy this over the 980ti for the same price.
Man this is ****ing hilarious rofl...
In the facepalm moment where he took off his glasses was pretty much me.
"Sir... I will remain and AMD fanboy for life." This was ****ing hilarious rofl.
"It's only a matter of time before nvidia releases their Pascal based GPUs! - Then what the **** AMD will do?!" rofl so true.
Rofl dude so true vid, what every amd (fanboy) must've felt waiting for the card.
They really did fail with this lol, in every aspect tbh.
Fury X is priced the same as the 980Ti here
Gonna get my 980 Ti G1 GAMING soon.
No not really, especially if it entails benchmarks that H did not test
According to FLIR pictures this thing is dead, so kill it with fire!!!
I agree to an extent.
If Hilbert did no tests what so ever and did not plan on doing tests, then okay. But that is not the case, and there may not be all the titles tested there are plenty of titles to show Fury X performance.
I will be buying the fury x for my next build. Windows 10 and dx12 will be where this new technology shines imho.
then in that case isnt the 980gtx a whole lote cheaper then what amd is asking? or i just look at wrong prices granted it does beat 980gtx but not by noticeable amount to warrant the higher price in my eyes
So how would using a 144hz monitor work? DP to DVI-D converter?
Mind loaning me your crystal ball I want tonight's powerball numbers.
AMD was planing to price this card higher because of yields but the $650 980Ti shot that down.
Apparently they have ran out of champagne in Santa Clara, CA
You look: http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_radeon_r9_fury_x_review,26.html