Radeon RX Vega to be Air and Liquid Cooled - XL XT and XTX models

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Jul 17, 2017.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    41,377
    Likes Received:
    9,512
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
  2. JonasBeckman

    JonasBeckman Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    17,486
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    GPU:
    MSI 6800 "Vanilla"
    So XT and XTX remains reference and the XL is the one getting third party designs but it will be a bit cut down (Unless it can be re-activated again.) with possibly different memory amounts as well, interesting. :)

    Basically a improved Fury then, voltage or power limitations might lower the max attainable clock speeds though on all but the water cooled edition but even that might require some tweaking. (Increasing voltage wasn't all that effective on the Fury after a certain point though.)


    EDIT: Will be interesting to see what the reviews for these will be, will also be fun to read what overclockers might try with them and if they can be modified at all when it comes to things like bios editing and what not.

    The XL and the XT are probably going to be throttled by the reduced power configuration compared to the XTX but by how much and how that will hit performance remains to be seen. (And how the cuts to the XL compare to the XT in terms of performance.)
     
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2017
  3. Evildead666

    Evildead666 Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,306
    Likes Received:
    275
    GPU:
    Vega64/EKWB/Noctua
    Hopefully the XT and XTX variants will be physically identical, apart from the coolers.
    that way if there is any BIOS limitations, it should be possible to flash an XT into an XTX (and slap a Waterblock on it ;))
     
  4. RzrTrek

    RzrTrek Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,516
    Likes Received:
    712
    GPU:
    RX 580
    How come AMD always insist on putting liquid cooling on their high powered frying pans?
     

  5. nevcairiel

    nevcairiel Master Guru

    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    293
    GPU:
    3090
    Because they apparently can't make an air cooler powerful enough to run their power hungry cards without cutting them down.

    Having two designs like this with different power and therefore performance profiles was always kinda dumb.
     
  6. xIcarus

    xIcarus Master Guru

    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    96
    GPU:
    1080 Ti AORUS
    Like Nvidia's reference coolers are any less sh1t. Almost all reference coolers are garbage.
    Nvidia's were especially bad during the Fermi period while AMD's during the 200 series. Hence the Thermi and 290x airplane/fryingpan/whatever jokes.

    The only actually good one was the cooler on the Fury X, but you could say that it's technically not reference since it wasn't AMD who designed it.

    Realistically, you usually get reference if you intend to watercool. AMD putting a watercooler on their high-end is a smart move, it saves you the trouble and you should pay less overall since they already have a contract with the cooling company, so they buy in bulk.
     
  7. Exascale

    Exascale Banned

    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    8
    GPU:
    Gigabyte G1 1070
    Its not like using liquid cooling is a bad thing. The most advanced computers are liquid cooled.
     
  8. Valken

    Valken Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,814
    Likes Received:
    215
    GPU:
    Forsa 1060 3GB Temp GPU
    Cannot wait to see the performance of the XTX vs 1080Ti, both OC'ed to the max stable clocks in 4K. That is where these will shine.
     
  9. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,793
    Likes Received:
    1,148
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    They better improve VRM cooling this time around. FuryX had horrid VRM cooling when compared to GPU cooling.
     
  10. SirDremor

    SirDremor Master Guru

    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Nvidia GTX 1050
    Well, at least some dumb AMD fanboys can't now deny 300W usage.

    Still don't expect miracles from these cards, too hot, to hungry, requires HBM2.
     

  11. Exascale

    Exascale Banned

    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    8
    GPU:
    Gigabyte G1 1070
    I was speaking generally about liquid cooling.

    Tbh i dont really know of many consumer GPUs that have excellent VRM cooling. It usually seems like an afterthought in most designs, despite it being a common point of failure.
     
  12. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,793
    Likes Received:
    1,148
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    Yeah, it just annoyed me on the FuryX seeing how compact the whole PCB was it would have been nice had the water block covered the VRM not just stick a pipe over it with some thermal tape (honestly passive cooling may have worked better.)
     
  13. Evildead666

    Evildead666 Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,306
    Likes Received:
    275
    GPU:
    Vega64/EKWB/Noctua
    I thought the Fury X had a heatpipe over the VRM's that connected to the Waterblock ? It should have been pretty cool, I would have thought...
     
  14. gerardfraser

    gerardfraser Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,343
    Likes Received:
    763
    GPU:
    R9 290 Crossfire

    Well thank god my GTX 1080TI only runs at 278 watts undervolted,and not frigging 300 watts I would never buy that card.

    [​IMG]
     
  15. Agonist

    Agonist Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,263
    Likes Received:
    509
    GPU:
    6800XT 16GB
    All of these crybabies crying about TDP.

    We are enthusiast, not green power users..

    Crying about the power usuage of a gpu, but many of you have a heavily overclocked CPU. Yes while the power usuage is lower on a cpu, i find it hilarious irony.


    And the Fury X had a heatpipe over the VRM that was part of the AIO.
    There was no VRM issues on the Fury X. I had one.
     

  16. H83

    H83 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,500
    Likes Received:
    877
    GPU:
    MSI Duke GTX1080Ti
    Having high TDP is bad but not a deal breaker, at least for me. What really matters are the performance and the price of those things.

    Also i really dislike the naming of them, what the hell are XL, TX and XTX supposed to mean??? Was somebody from AMD marketing watching a porn flick and thought those names are cool?...
     
  17. Truder

    Truder Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    440
    GPU:
    Sapphire Fury Nitro
    It's a throwback from the original naming convention used by ATi, XTX being the top tier model, followed by XT and the XL being the value version of the top card.

    Remember the 9800XT? X800XT or X800XL? Or the X1950XTX etc.
     
  18. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,793
    Likes Received:
    1,148
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    Because it was just the return pipe from the water block flattened on one side and taped to the VRM's the water was moving over it too fast to do any real heat transfer. VRM temps where reported in the 90's at default in some reviews. While that is within safe temperatures for the VRM it does seem very high for a water cooled card. In fact most AIO cooled hybrid cards with a blower fan going across the VRM's do good as well.
     
  19. Rich_Guy

    Rich_Guy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    12,681
    Likes Received:
    667
    GPU:
    MSI 2070S X-Trio
    Lets just hope the AIO doesn't suffer from the whine the Fury X one suffered from, as everyone will be going for that, instead of the one with that crappy FE blower cooler on it :p
     
  20. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,793
    Likes Received:
    1,148
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    I'd go for the blower cooler and slap a full cover on it personally.

    BTW what happened to that nice small PCB that Fiji had. This card is as big as a GP102.
     

Share This Page