(PhysX Test) GTX 680 vs GTX 580 vs GTX 480 in FluidMark

Discussion in 'Videocards vs General Purpose - NVIDIA Ageia PhysX' started by Spets, May 2, 2012.

  1. Spets

    Spets Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    157
    GPU:
    RTX 3090
    Spets, May 2, 2012
    #1
  2. Xtreme1979

    Xtreme1979 Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,328
    Likes Received:
    26
    GPU:
    ROG Strix RTX 2070
    So a nice PhysX boost with the 680. Good find!
     
    Xtreme1979, May 2, 2012
    #2
  3. Spets

    Spets Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    157
    GPU:
    RTX 3090
    Considering it's double the performance, I'd like to see some proper CUDA based benchmarks between the 680 and 580. Don't think the OpenCL benchmarks show what the 680 can really do.
    Although GK110 will probably be a much less crippled version for GeForce Kepler.
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2012
    Spets, May 2, 2012
    #3
  4. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,111
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    the only thing I see wrong is the 480 is at stock, the 580 has a 25 mhz oc and the 680 is at 1097mhz where stock is 1006. all at stock or all similarily oc would be better
     
    ---TK---, May 2, 2012
    #4

  5. Spets

    Spets Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    157
    GPU:
    RTX 3090
    The 680's clock could have been from boost in the benchmark.
    Would be interesting to see how they rank clock for clock, although with the 680's score I'd still imagine it would be ahead.
     
    Spets, May 3, 2012
    #5
  6. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,111
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    gt 520 as gpu 2 with the 680 as gpu 1?
     
    ---TK---, May 3, 2012
    #6
  7. Spets

    Spets Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    157
    GPU:
    RTX 3090
    What?
    I'm having one of those days :p
     
    Spets, May 3, 2012
    #7
  8. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,111
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    Just read the link you provided. You will see.
     
    ---TK---, May 3, 2012
    #8
  9. Spets

    Spets Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    157
    GPU:
    RTX 3090
    Ah, now I get it, shouldn't add to the score since multithread is off.
    Wonder why he left it in the testbed though.
     
    Spets, May 3, 2012
    #9
  10. Valken

    Valken Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    168
    GPU:
    Forsa 1060 3GB Temp GPU
    Too bad the newest Fluidmark does not work with Hybrid PhysX.
     
    Valken, May 11, 2012
    #10

  11. Lane

    Lane Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,361
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x HD7970 - EK Waterblock
    Well OpenCL is one thing, but directompute benchmark show the same.. in SP performance and fluidmark physx, the 680 do well, but when it come to DP, things is over. The DP rate of the 680 is lower of the 580... I will rather see too more physX and cuda benchmark for get the result.
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
    Lane, May 12, 2012
    #11
  12. Spets

    Spets Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    157
    GPU:
    RTX 3090
    Yeah after a few reviews comparing the 680's SP to the 580 in CUDA, it flies well ahead. The card is too crippled when it comes to DP though. PhysX works well but I'd like to see the uncrippled Tesla GK110 in benchmarks compared to the 20-series :)
     
    Spets, May 14, 2012
    #12

Share This Page