1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Palit Launches GeForce GT 710 Graphics Card

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Jan 26, 2016.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    36,055
    Likes Received:
    5,095
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    Palit announced the 192 Shader processor based GeForce GT graphics card, the Palit GeForce GT 710 series. To make your entire PC experience up to 10x faster than integrated graphics-including web bro...

    Palit Launches GeForce GT 710 Graphics Card
     
  2. vazup

    vazup Master Guru

    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    r9 280X
    Is there any point for this graphics card? I dont know about video editing but for my photo editing program depends on the CPU it doesnt care what GPU you use so might as well stick with just integrated graphics.
     
  3. fantaskarsef

    fantaskarsef Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    10,706
    Likes Received:
    2,880
    GPU:
    2080Ti @h2o
    I guess such cards are mainly interesting in the OEM market (people don't know what they buy), or for older rigs with CPUs not containing an iGPU (like my systems usually).

    Another part is that when you want to go for a silent PC first, and performance second, smaller chips like these help reduce the stock on bad (and then laser cut chips), as well as getting a passive cooling sollution. Sadly the fans in most coolers still aren't as good as the ones you can buy for cases, and simply strap onto such a passively cooled card, if you really want or need to.
     
  4. vbetts

    vbetts Don Vincenzo Staff Member

    Messages:
    14,670
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    GPU:
    RTX 2070FE
    Office machines.
     

  5. scatman839

    scatman839 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,966
    Likes Received:
    400
    GPU:
    1080, KD55XD800
    Yeah, going to be for old crap machines getting up to with windows 10 standard
     
  6. isidore

    isidore Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,174
    Likes Received:
    9
    GPU:
    R9 FuryX 4GB HBM
    Yep, that need PhysX technology. LOL
     
  7. Martinfield

    Martinfield Member

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    2x 290x @1075
    No but perhaps they need multiple monitors? This at least lets you use 3 monitors I don't know how common that is on motherboards/igpus.
     
  8. vbetts

    vbetts Don Vincenzo Staff Member

    Messages:
    14,670
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    GPU:
    RTX 2070FE
    multiple monitor support.

    Replace dead video cards.

    Some of my reporting software can use CUDA.

    Big one for schools Minecraft EDU edition, and Lego Land. Both do not work very well on Intel iGPU's and older gpus.
     
  9. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,740
    Likes Received:
    1,466
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    "10x faster than integrated graphics". That is some badass gt710 right there.
     
  10. blahsaysblah

    blahsaysblah Member

    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 750 Ti 2GB
    Got a fanless geforce 210 to add replace gaming card when i stopped gaming for a while.

    Even today almost no motherboards have HDMI 2.0, and quite a few no Display Ports.

    Adding 4K support for productivity uses is what it will be most likely... 1st world problems.
     

  11. moab600

    moab600 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,099
    Likes Received:
    97
    GPU:
    980TI Gaming
    you forgot the "up to 10x" which validates the card, like 0X maybe!!! those cards are so pointless, i bet this card will drive the computer to the nearest repair milk farm, and then proceed to milk a pascal or maxwell, MILK ME!!!
     
  12. extide

    extide New Member

    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    7970/3GB
    Yeah, no HDMI 2.0 on these puppies either, they are Kepler. GK208.

    Seems really odd to be releasing new Kepler cards, why not release the Maxwell equivalent? I'm pretty sure there is a GM208.

    EDIT: There is a GM108 but no GM208 -- still better than a GK208.
     
  13. sykozis

    sykozis Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    21,003
    Likes Received:
    656
    GPU:
    MSI RX5700
    I wonder what iGPU they're referring to... It's definitely not 80% faster than any of Intel's recent iGPUs.... It won't even get close to being 80% faster than AMD's iGPUs...
     
  14. -Tj-

    -Tj- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    16,380
    Likes Received:
    1,473
    GPU:
    Zotac GTX980Ti OC
    Its not usable even for physx, too weak.. For physx it would be ideal a GT 740 GDDR5. Or better yet a GT750 since it doesn't need a 6pin, unlike GT740. Its basically the same as 740GT but with extra 192 cores.


    Idk how can they claim its 10x faster then igpu, I mean it has lousy 14GB/s bandwitdh, even my igpu has 35GB/s. :grin:
     
  15. tsunami231

    tsunami231 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,661
    Likes Received:
    359
    GPU:
    EVGA 1070Ti Black
    um arnt we on the 9xx series soon to be 1xxx or what ever the new scheme will be? why people released 7xx series stuff still? would be better to just use 9xx series? Claiming 4k is funny sure it can output it my 660gtx can out put it too, but it surely cant handle 4k

    that or i just completely missed the plot.
     

Share This Page