omega or starstorm

Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA Modified Drivers' started by bigirb2002, Jan 1, 2004.

  1. bigirb2002

    bigirb2002 Guest

    which give more performance with good image quality latest omega or latest starstorms
     
  2. OlharaK

    OlharaK Master Guru

    Messages:
    546
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI GF4Ti4400
    My vote goes for starstorm, they give awesome quality with good performance:)
     
  3. StitcheS

    StitcheS Member Guru

    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    eVGA Geforce7 7900GTX PCI-e
    I agree, Starstorms are my favorite drivers.
     
  4. Utopia

    Utopia Master Guru

    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Sapphire 280x
    If I could actually download the StarStorm 53.03 I'd give them a try... :(
     

  5. Ricksta

    Ricksta Master Guru

    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX 6600 256MB DDR 16x @ 420/500
    Definatly the starstorms, you have the same card as my and im using the starstorm 53.03XQ's and they perform amazingly in ut2003, i cranked everything up on high (and my pc isnt particuallry (sp?) fast) and not only did it look amazing but it performed amazing too!
     
  6. Soto_Ayam

    Soto_Ayam Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    8800GTS 640MB SLI
    You can run UT2003 + crank everyone on high with that system?
    Hehe I'm kinda shocked...
     
  7. Soto_Ayam

    Soto_Ayam Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    8800GTS 640MB SLI
    You can run UT2003 + crank everything on high with that system?
    Hehe I'm kinda shocked...
     
  8. SL2

    SL2 Guest

    Messages:
    4,335
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    GTX 980
    I'm findng that hard to belive seeing as my system spec wont run UT2003 at the highest settings without my framerate dropping to below 25fps.
    An 800Mhz Duron and a GF2MX400 probably wont even run UT2003 at the highest detail settings in 640by480 with FSAA and AF dissabled unless you enjoy polaroid gaming.
     
  9. Ricksta

    Ricksta Master Guru

    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX 6600 256MB DDR 16x @ 420/500
    Lol, i meant performed amazing comapred to waht i thought it was gonna run like :)
     
  10. Soto_Ayam

    Soto_Ayam Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    8800GTS 640MB SLI
    Hehe just teasing ya, sorry for double posting btw.
     

  11. Ice T

    Ice T Member

    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Leadtek WinFast A380 Ultra TDH MyViVO - FX 5950U
    bb_ricksta, that can't be right!

    I had a Ti 4600, and to get a good framerate, I had to stick with the “Normal” setting inside the game!

    When I started the game with the highest setting possible, the framerate dropped to unplayable - it was doing single digits and every once a while, I had only pictures, no movement at all some places!

    I now got a Leadtek A380 nVIDIA FX 5950, all settings at max, 4 AA and 4 AF, and UT2003 is pushing 80 - 90 frames average - I love this game now! :)

    I am using the standard nVIDIA 53.03, but I'm downloading the StarStorm 53.03XQ as I write this - hope the IQ will be even better with this driver...

    OK - Sorry, I noticed your last post, compared to what you expected it to do, but still...

    Ice T.
     
  12. bigirb2002

    bigirb2002 Guest

    o yeah an my core speed is set high but my gpu has a heat sink on the gpu with a fan on it also.i bought it like that.my manafacter is xfx.they make some pretty fast cards.
     
  13. Ricksta

    Ricksta Master Guru

    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX 6600 256MB DDR 16x @ 420/500
    to be honest, its not single digits..10-15 fps :) Lol, but to the one who said you doubt it would be playable wiv my machine on 640*480 on my machine wiv everything on high, it is :)
     
  14. bigirb2002

    bigirb2002 Guest

    durons are not actually bad
     
  15. Wonder MaN

    Wonder MaN Master Guru

    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX GeForcE 7300GT 256M.B @ 500/800
    i can run all the games @ Resolution "1280*1024" @ average 50 FPS , As 4 UT2003 I could max out graphic Details & Visual Effects also @ 1280
    *1024 Receiving 25-35 FPS
    i can judge that my System is well built enough :)
     

  16. Spriggan17

    Spriggan17 Member

    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    PNY 6800* unlocked to 16/6 128mb agp!
    Where can I get them the download link appears unavialable??
     
  17. Utopia

    Utopia Master Guru

    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Sapphire 280x
    Go to a search engine and search for StarStorm 53.03X and you'll find a site... :rolleyes:
     
  18. komplexnous

    komplexnous Guest

    My computer has been getting the n4_mini.sys BSOD and n4_disp.sys BSOD ever since I installed the Starstorm drivers!!!
    Does anyone know how to fix this?
    I uninstalled, used Driver Cleaner 2, installed 45.23, 43.45, 44.67, 45.32....etc...NOTHING FIXES THIS!!!!
    ....Am I really going to have to reformat!??!?! :(
     
  19. SL2

    SL2 Guest

    Messages:
    4,335
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    GTX 980
    30-35FPS is the min playable frame rate for UT2003 IMO.
    My system reaches 35FPS average on a mix of normal/higher @ 1024*768 2xS AA & 2xAF.
    I cant get your speeds with my system that high but I guess that's probably down to your GPU managing to reach 325Mhz as I've found CPU clock speeds over 1.8Ghz don't have as great of effect unless it's to do with the physics detail level.
     
  20. chris454

    chris454 Active Member

    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    WinFast A350 Ultra TDH MyVIVO flashed A380
    Back on track the answer is StarStorm!
     

Share This Page