Official Call of Juarez DX10 Benchmark Post Results here

Post Your Scores...:smoke: Im waiting to overclock my CPU faster before i post.. My scores will be up soon.

 

With 1680x1050 res and all settings maxed i got min 4.9 max 22.1 avg 13.5 thats with the latest beta drivers 158.45 when i turn off super sample i get min 14.4 max 42.7 avg 23.8 we need to agree a setting if we are going to compare but slick its not and doesnt look good for dx10 with this kind of performance sofar.With shadow quality set to normal 2 and supersampling and multi sampling off it runs much better and looks just as good to my eyes and scores min 19.5 max 77.8 avg 43 after some more runs i find its the multi sampling and and super sampling that seem to kill the fps so with them turned off i set x16 af and x16q aa in nvidia cp i got min19.5 max 80.2 and avg 42.8

 

Ok here are mine!
8800GTS 320MB stock clocks with 158.45 Driver

I took screen with mobile phone so...

 

LOL =) You can just make a printscreen by pressing prt scr or something like that on your keyboard and then paste ( ctrl + v ) the image in Paint

Good luck :thumbup: !

 

it doesn't work in DX10 App's

 

If you wanna compare, use same settings as others. Topic start lacks information / purpose.

How about everyone uses this settings to compare:

Resolution: 1280x1024
Shadow map size: 2048x2048
Shadows Quality: high
Anti-aliasing: 2xMSAA

Audio: Enable
Fullscreen: Enable


min: 15.7
max: 59.5
average: 27.6

I'll make a photo tomorrow.
I'd say, not bad for a benchmark that is from a TWIMTBP game. :knock:

 

i think the DX10 version isnt TWIMTBP..

 

I ran the benchmark and scores 16.1 FPS average, then installed the newest directx 9/10 update (6/9/07) from microsoft and my average was 11.7 FPS at the same settings. Anyone else have this happen? Then I rebooted and my average was 9 FPS... should I restore to the older directx?

Settings were 1920x1200 with everything high except no AA.

 

Everyone should run the same settings as keldereik said.

 

min: 10.2
max: 23.8
average: 14.2

So basically, my GTS 320 can't play Juarez in Directx 10

 

My results using Keldereriks settings are min 17.4 max 75.5 avg 43.0 pc all stock clocks and 158.45 drivers.

 

Ofcourse you can. Just this settings are very high. Shadow maps are really extreme. Put those lower and you got playable framerate.

That is nice. I Am sure new drivers will increase performance.

 

system and bench on stock settings 26.1.
ohh , and im not impressed with this dx10 demo. it lacks any noticable differance from dx9 imo.

 

The more intense HDR, smooth Edge vegation, Complex shaders on tree and geometry shader on waterfall passed your eyes?

 

ive seen better looking demo's of farcry in dx9 than this demo.
i noticed the very subtle image tweeks but i am not impressed with this supposed next gen benchie.
i even think the nv head demo is better than cascades.

 

now i get 24.2 with sound disabled .
all system and benchie settings are stock.

 

It's not, in fact it is more an Ati optimized game.
(No Nvidia logo to be seen, which can't be said of Ati's...)

 

It's strange because the origional game was twimtbp. Why did they optimize it for ATI?

Btw for 2900 owners, the ruby demo is released on ati.amd.com for download.

http://ati.amd.com/developer/demos/rhd2000.html

 

Vista 64bit 158.45

is there a way to make a screenshot in dx10?

 

No, even fraps can't make screenshots. Kinda dumb for a benchmark..

That's kinda weird if you run it with lower details and get less than the guy above. Does quadcore benefit here?