NZXT announces its first lineup of audio products for gamers

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:24 AM.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    36,267
    Likes Received:
    5,302
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
  2. glutto

    glutto Master Guru

    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    RX 580 8GB
    Can I get 4k resolution and 240fps out of these headphones?
    Do they support raytracing?
    Etc, etc.
     
  3. Loobyluggs

    Loobyluggs Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,170
    Likes Received:
    477
    GPU:
    EVGA 1070 FTW
    I'm too spoilt with my 32bit DAC, 24 is just not gonna cut it for me - nice as these products are.

    When are 64bit DAC's going mainstream? I know they are out there in chip form already, but nothing for consumers?
     
  4. yasamoka

    yasamoka Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,728
    Likes Received:
    178
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 1080Ti SC
    Forget 64-bit. I've heard that 128-bit is so good you don't even need headphones or speakers to hear the sound waves.
     

  5. Loobyluggs

    Loobyluggs Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,170
    Likes Received:
    477
    GPU:
    EVGA 1070 FTW
    Where did you hear that from; I have not heard anything about 128 bit DAC chips?
     
  6. schmidtbag

    schmidtbag Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,491
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    GPU:
    HIS R9 290
    Are you sure you're not confusing bit depth with sample rate? A bit depth of 24 has more dynamic range than what almost any human could possibly notice. Given sufficient equipment and a track with a lot of dynamic range (such as an action movie, or an orchestra), I think the average person could notice the difference going from 16 to 24, but I'm very confident nobody (except maybe a handful of savants) could confidently tell the difference from 24 to 32 in a blind test.
    That being said, I'm sure the sample rate is why you enjoy your DAC so much. That, and the overall signal quality it produces. Sample rate determines how much detail is captured in the recording. A sample rate going from 96KHz to 48KHz is very noticeably worse. Sometimes even going from 48KHz to 44.1KHz can be noticeable.
    From what I've heard (pun intended), 196KHz adds far more depth than what humans can hear. Some audiophiles ostensibly can tell the difference from that between 96KHz. I think there are DACs that go higher, but that's obviously pointless.

    Side note:
    I think it makes perfect sense to record audio in uncompressed 32-bit, then step down to a 24-bit FLAC or whatever - much in the same way a professional photographer edits with raw photos but will distribute their content as JPEGs or TIFFs. Once you have the audio levels normalized properly, 32-bit is utterly useless for playback purposes. I can't imagine any situation where your dynamic range will be so wide-spread that having 32-bit would retain any practical (let alone desirable) use for playback.
    So, I predict 64-bit audio chipsets will never exist for commercial use. They'll probably exist for scientific and industrial purposes, though. Should a commercial one ever exist, it'll be a placebo marketing scam, like speakers that cost more specifically because they can play sounds at 50KHz.
     
    Mufflore likes this.
  7. Loobyluggs

    Loobyluggs Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,170
    Likes Received:
    477
    GPU:
    EVGA 1070 FTW
    So, what you are saying is, 32-bit is better than 24-bit.
     
  8. yasamoka

    yasamoka Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,728
    Likes Received:
    178
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 1080Ti SC
    What 32-bit audio content do you play over your DAC?
     
    theoneofgod likes this.
  9. Loobyluggs

    Loobyluggs Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,170
    Likes Received:
    477
    GPU:
    EVGA 1070 FTW
    I have no idea, but the audio content that is being analysed, is being analysed at greater depth wouldn't you say? Is that not why we have DAC's ? To convert digital into analogue?
     
  10. sverek

    sverek Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,359
    Likes Received:
    2,251
    GPU:
    NOVIDIA -0.5GB
    More numbers the better, you are right.

    Personally I find 16bit/44100hz more than enough with my audio gear, I am human being for god sake. But if you manage to placebo yourself by number, please enjoy it.
     

  11. kado

    kado Member

    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    GTX1070 G1 8GB
    The DAC is the final stage in audio output, all processing is done before that.
    A 24bit audio signal has 144dB of dynamic range, currently there's no circuitry that support such dynamic range. Your DAC even if is "supports" 32bit signals, will be limited by the output circuitry (like the DAC itself, opamps, etc). I think currently the max dynamic range is at 126dB.
    Also you need speakers or headphones sensitive enough to to also output those dynamic ranges.

    Also Human ears are not that sensitive that can discern audio with such a dynamic range.
     
    Mufflore likes this.
  12. Loobyluggs

    Loobyluggs Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,170
    Likes Received:
    477
    GPU:
    EVGA 1070 FTW
    Would you be able to branch that out, because I think it is this which I lack the knowledge on:

    My understanding is a basic and simple as this:

    Digital Audio Input (an audio, audio/visual file) containing digital audio binary information that needs to be analysed => DAC => Speakers.

    So, where is your processing being done in the above, if in fact I have got this right?

    I just do not know where the flaws are in truth, as my (limited) understanding is that: you have digital audio that is analysed by the DAC to convert the digital information in usage analogue information that the speakers understand so they can create vibrations.

    The higher the number, the more analysis is done (by the chip) to send to the speakers.
     
  13. Crazy Serb

    Crazy Serb Member Guru

    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    5
    GPU:
    270X Hawk 1200-1302
    240 fps with CAM installed?! Keep dreaming.
     
  14. Mufflore

    Mufflore Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,363
    Likes Received:
    585
    GPU:
    Redacted by NDA
    Processing is performed before it is fed to the DAC.

    DAC chips and supporting circuitry have enough noise to prevent needing more than 21bit output.
    Any more bits on the DAC chips output serve little other purpose than to give headroom on the volume control before quality is reduced.
    Processing can already be done at 64bit or higher independently of the DAC chip, either in a PC or a processor on a DAC.
    Dont expect any higher than 32bit DAC chips other than for marketing.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2019 at 2:55 AM
  15. Loobyluggs

    Loobyluggs Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,170
    Likes Received:
    477
    GPU:
    EVGA 1070 FTW
    Wait...the DAC does NOT do any analysis of the file whatsoever?
     

Share This Page