Nvidia GeForce Beta 275.50

Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce Drivers Section' started by CrazyT666, Jun 20, 2011.

  1. RavenMaster

    RavenMaster Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    138
    GPU:
    1x RTX 3080 FE
    Wow what a f***ing waste of time these betas were. I had hoped they would fix the crysis 2 weapon/shadows flickering bug. It seems like they did nothing at all to advance functionality. What a steaming pile of $%@! and a waste of my time >_<
     
  2. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    15,616
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    next time read the release notes before downloading. :wanker:
     
  3. Darren Hodgson

    Darren Hodgson Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    16,000
    Likes Received:
    517
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2
    They are aware of the Crysis 2 issues I believe and I'm sure I saw somewhere that those fixes as well as others will be included in the next 276.xx (280.xx?) WHQL release next month.
     
  4. Infinity7_00

    Infinity7_00 Banned

    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    NVidia GTX580SC 1536mb
    The release notes mention that some Crysis weapon textures are missing when using DirectX 9.

    Right now I think most of their driver team is working on the 280.xx branch of drivers.

    GeForce 275.50 beta is [r275_37-16]
    Quadro 275.36 WHQL is [r275_21-17]
    GeForce 275.33 WHQL is [r275_21-12]
    GeForce 275.27 beta is [r275_21-3]
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2011

  5. CalinTM

    CalinTM Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,570
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    MSi GTX980 GAMING 1531mhz
    I really hope that new whql 280 set or whatever everybody talks about,they say most of the gaming issues will be fixed including that windows 7 boot logo artefact, and witcher 2 performance, and crysis 2 bugs, i really hope, i don't want to wait another month, or a month and a half to see a changelog of the 280.xx and nothing special, or in mine problems, and others.
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2011
  6. RavenMaster

    RavenMaster Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    138
    GPU:
    1x RTX 3080 FE
    If they're so similar to 275.33 then why do the new 275.50 beta's lose me a 1000 points in Vantage when compared to the last WHQL?
     
  7. CalinTM

    CalinTM Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,570
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    MSi GTX980 GAMING 1531mhz
    Some of you are obsessed of benckmarks and points....
     
  8. TheHunter

    TheHunter Banned

    Messages:
    13,408
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    MSi N570GTX TFIII [OC|PE]
    i hope so too, im gonna stick with official 270.90 tesla for now..
     
  9. CPC_RedDawn

    CPC_RedDawn Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    8,282
    Likes Received:
    661
    GPU:
    Zotac GTX1080Ti AMP
    OMFG!!! These drivers made all my games run in DX9999999999!!!!! They look like real life now!!!

    OMFG!!! BEST DRIVERS EVER!!!!!!

    lol... nah they are pretty decent, nothing much changed for me from the 275.36 quadros.
     
  10. sava700

    sava700 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,862
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080GTX FWT
    I'll skip these considering they are really close to the WHQL set with limited changes.
     

  11. KingpinZero

    KingpinZero Master Guru

    Messages:
    915
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI Armor GTX1080
  12. AMD@OPA

    AMD@OPA Member

    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI 560GTX TF II OC
    So for me the colors looks really better with 275.50 beta.
    A few less points in heaven, which is not so bad.
     
  13. Infinity7_00

    Infinity7_00 Banned

    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    NVidia GTX580SC 1536mb
    GeForce 275.50 vs Quadro 275.36 vs Tesla 270.90
    in Heaven Benchmark
    Test machine: Win7 64-bit, GTX 580, 1920 x 1080 res

    NVidia Control Panel Settings:
    Single display performance mode
    Performance Management Mode Prefer Max Performance
    Texture Filtering Quality High Quality
    Threaded Optimization Auto
    Vsync Off

    Heaven Benchmark 2.5 with DirectX 9
    4x AA, 16x Anistropic, Ambient Occlusion disabled
    Scores-MinFPS-AvgFPS-MaxFPS
    2222 - 45.2 - 88.2 - 184.0 - driver 270.90 with 4x AA
    2241 - 45.6 - 89.0 - 187.1 - driver 275.36 with 4x AA
    2251 - 47.3 - 89.3 - 186.2 - driver 275.50 with 4x AA

    I let the Heaven Benchmark cycle through one complete time before I began the actual test because I've noticed it makes a difference. MinFPS values are held a bit higher with these 275.50 drivers. I like drivers that give the best MinFPS values. Usually my benchmarks of the 275.xx family of drivers don't show this much of an increase in Scores and MinFPS when going to the next driver version.

    NVidia typically does not mention all of the things that were really changed in the release notes. I'll try some games next.
     
  14. Spets

    Spets Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,059
    Likes Received:
    155
    GPU:
    RTX 3090


    Yeah they save it for the whql or the new family driver set with a pretty power-point slide :p
     
  15. rewt

    rewt Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,279
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    Yes
    Try "High Performance" mode.

    Lately I haven't seen a difference in image quality between HP and HQ modes ever since nvidia scrapped bilinear filtering. I'd be interested to hear if you can spot a difference.
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2011

  16. TheDeeGee

    TheDeeGee Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,838
    Likes Received:
    1,072
    GPU:
    NVIDIA GTX 1070
    Ye, seems it's more important to get 10 more points in a Benchmark then having games run smooth.
     
  17. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    15,616
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    benchmarks are SRS BSNS
     
  18. Infinity7_00

    Infinity7_00 Banned

    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    NVidia GTX580SC 1536mb
    I've been getting some inconsistencies when trying to do comparison benchmarks in CoD Black Ops but the Heaven Benchmark has a lot of consistency factors programmed into it.

    Here are a set of CoD Black Ops benchmarks:


    Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg

    6494, 30000, 198, 247, 216.467 - driver 270.90 with 4x AA
    6406, 30000, 193, 241, 213.533 - driver 275.36 with 4x AA
    6535, 30000, 200, 244, 217.833 - driver 275.50 with 4x AA

    I've never gotten a MinFPS value as high as 200 before in testing CoD Black Ops.
     
  19. deluxe

    deluxe Master Guru

    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Gigabyte 980Ti G1
    The flames look better with these drivers.
    [​IMG]

    Also check out the reflections on these gloves!
    [​IMG]

    And here is some random yellow text just to annoy you.
    P.S. You need to read infinity's posts in other driver threads to fully understand my postings.
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2011
  20. TheHunter

    TheHunter Banned

    Messages:
    13,408
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    MSi N570GTX TFIII [OC|PE]
    that looks like trolling to me :p



    and Infinity, why dont you test Heaven 2.5 in dx11 and extreme tessellation (with aa off)?

    In dx9 its rather useless imo..
     

Share This Page