1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Nvidia GeForce 391.35 drivers (FC5) Download & Discussion

Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce Drivers Section' started by newls1, Mar 27, 2018.

  1. squalles

    squalles Master Guru

    Messages:
    691
    Likes Received:
    26
    GPU:
    Galax GTX 1080 EXOC OC
    i be very happy if i see 1 fps improvement by every driver released :D
     
  2. tensai28

    tensai28 Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,416
    Likes Received:
    365
    GPU:
    2080ti MSI X TRIO
    Although 1fps isn't much, if every driver released had a 1fps improvement, then 5 drivers later we'd be up by 5fps. ;) That's mostly wishful thinking though. Seriously though anyone try final fantasy with these?
     
  3. peppercute

    peppercute Master Guru

    Messages:
    437
    Likes Received:
    84
    GPU:
    Msi 2080 TI TRIO
    Today was patch for bf
     
    Robbo9999 likes this.
  4. BReal85

    BReal85 Master Guru

    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    92
    GPU:
    ASUS 270X DC2 TOP
    Vega56 still has a 10% advantage ahead of the 1070.
     

  5. cricket bones

    cricket bones Master Guru

    Messages:
    580
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    EVGA 980 TI FTW
    It's called margin of error...
     
    -Tj- likes this.
  6. squalles

    squalles Master Guru

    Messages:
    691
    Likes Received:
    26
    GPU:
    Galax GTX 1080 EXOC OC
    yeah... i have these margin of error in every last 5 or 6 drivers... finally i have margin of error to more and not less
     
  7. cricket bones

    cricket bones Master Guru

    Messages:
    580
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    EVGA 980 TI FTW
    That's...not how it works.
     
  8. dr_rus

    dr_rus Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,980
    Likes Received:
    322
    GPU:
    RTX 2080 OC
    [​IMG]

    Anything else?

    A. Vega 56 is about 10% ahead of 1070 on average in all games.
    B. FC5 is AMD's game so whatever was optimized in it wasn't optimized for NV h/w.
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2018
  9. squalles

    squalles Master Guru

    Messages:
    691
    Likes Received:
    26
    GPU:
    Galax GTX 1080 EXOC OC
    you can read?

    391.35 - r391_33-2

    definitely r391 is different branch than r390
     
  10. Xman01

    Xman01 Active Member

    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    Gigabyte 1070 Mini
    I haven't ran smooth since the affliction crap came out.
     
    Robbo9999 likes this.

  11. dr_rus

    dr_rus Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,980
    Likes Received:
    322
    GPU:
    RTX 2080 OC
    It's pretty obvious who can't read here.
     
    DJ_Casper likes this.
  12. squalles

    squalles Master Guru

    Messages:
    691
    Likes Received:
    26
    GPU:
    Galax GTX 1080 EXOC OC
    :rolleyes: looks you really have one problem to accept when you say anything clearly wrong

    that´s so stupid

    but the fact are just one... are r391 branch and not r390
     
  13. AndyMutz

    AndyMutz Master Guru

    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    GTX 1080 TI @ 2 GHz
    just a quick confirmation that the firefox TDRs are still not fixed in 391.35 :mad:

    -andy-
     
  14. dr_rus

    dr_rus Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,980
    Likes Received:
    322
    GPU:
    RTX 2080 OC
    Yeah, I'm clearly wrong, as well as the company which made the driver. You're the only one right and it's me who's having a problem here.
    GFY.
     
  15. squalles

    squalles Master Guru

    Messages:
    691
    Likes Received:
    26
    GPU:
    Galax GTX 1080 EXOC OC
    company? the company released a driver using branch r391_33-2

    just need read this to know is different than r390 or to be more specific the r390_99 or r390_00 range

    or you have a problem or don´t have knowledge about what you´re discussing here
     

  16. dr_rus

    dr_rus Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,980
    Likes Received:
    322
    GPU:
    RTX 2080 OC
    Branch is clearly stated in the release notes. Internal version of the driver which you refer to is not always indicative of the branch its from.

    I honestly have nothing more to add. This driver is from R390 branch, same branch as all previously released 390.xx drivers. If you want to prove otherwise I'd suggest you go directly to Nvidia since it's them who is stating this, not me. Good luck.
     
  17. squalles

    squalles Master Guru

    Messages:
    691
    Likes Received:
    26
    GPU:
    Galax GTX 1080 EXOC OC
    hahahaha ok if driver says r391 but one pdf call him of r200 so are r200 branch driver

    and same branch than olders 390xx drivers? you really don´t know what you saying

    Driver 391.35 is r391_33-2
    Driver 391.24 is r390_99-9
    Driver 391.05 is r390_99-5
    Driver 391.01 is r390_99-2
    Driver 390.77 is r390_00-154
    yeah... looks the same hahahaha
     
  18. Robbo9999

    Robbo9999 Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    212
    GPU:
    GTX1070 @2050Mhz
    Yeah, the Spectre protection does make BF1 stutter once in a while - I think it's because BF1 is such a CPU heavy game, and the Spectre protection makes CPUs less efficient. I average about about 65% Total CPU Usage on my 4.6Ghz 6700K, with spikes to 100% on all cores, according to HWInfo, (that's on Team Deathmatch with only 20 players though, I haven't done measurements on the 64 player Operations Mode - CPU usage probably even higher there). It's possible that BF1 might be smoother with CPU's with 6 or more real cores with this Spectre protection enabled, because there's not much/any overhead left when running BF1 on a 4c/8t CPU. (I am talking 120-144fps though, so that increases CPU usage too).
     
  19. BReal85

    BReal85 Master Guru

    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    92
    GPU:
    ASUS 270X DC2 TOP
    A. Vega 56 is about 3% faster in FHD and 7% faster in 1440P, so overall it's a bit bigger gap than the average. But if you check other benchmarks in 1440P: TPUp 49-61 fps, Techspot 64-79, Kitguru 66-82. All 3 is about 25% difference, not 10-11%. PCGamer also has a 10% difference. Anyway, the 10-11% difference is bigger than the average difference.

    B. I leave this here to taste the difference what an AMD and NV sponsored title looks like:

    Far Cry 5 as an AMD sponsored game: running decent on both manufacturers' cards.

    Far Cry 4 as an NV sponsored game: "Ubisoft continued its partnership with nVidia into Far Cry 4, featuring inclusion of soft shadows, HBAO+, fine-tuned god rays and lighting FX, and other GameWorks-enabled technologies. Perhaps in tow of this partnership, we found AMD cards suffered substantially with Far Cry 4 on PC. "
     
  20. dr_rus

    dr_rus Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,980
    Likes Received:
    322
    GPU:
    RTX 2080 OC
    Because B.

    Far Cry 4 also ran better on AMD h/w during its release (I think that it was only one GW feature which were too heavy for GCN cards but eh, whatever). Far Cry 5 runs worse on NV h/w on every setting option. So yeah, "taste the difference".
     

Share This Page