Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce Drivers Section' started by AndyB, Dec 4, 2012.
So no SLI-profile for Most Wanted? Maybe in the future?
What is your gpu usage in Hitman? And you might want to lower ingame AA, 2-4xAA max.
When installing any of the 310.xx drivers on Windows 8 PRO x64
I get this : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wq9NkGHKccY
The funny thing is .. the drivers works fine after being installed but after rebooting I get the above issue. I'm not using UEFI on win 8.
The 306.97 driver works fine on windows 8 x64.
The 310.70 driver works fine on windows 7 x64.
Excatlly same thing here, installed didnt reboot after pc ran fine played gw2 for awhile, then shutdown to goto bed and on booting this morning get what you show on above youtube.
I get the same in both win7 & 8 but it boots up ~ 3-4 sec, in windows 8 it can be a little longer, up to 10-15sec. In that time "gpu loses signal" and LCD shows a sign kinda like when you unplug it from gpu.
thanks downloading right now
Did the same but not detecting any updates for me?
do these drivers overclock GTX680 ok with evga precision x??
Hey Manuelg or AndyB, i´m currently having some weird issues with Far Cry 3 and my SLI configuration. The game runs well, 60FPS most of the time, everthing on ultra, 4xMSAA. However, in certain spots (red rocks and trials), my fps drops to 20-30 after dying and reloading. Some suggested it could be an issue with tripple buffering...but i cannot confirm. The thing is that, as I have tested, the problem does not happen while using just one card (i.e. deactivating SLI)....
Same thing for i have done a system restore because i was unable to use the PC anymore.
great work nVidia!
You can use the SLI profile for Assasin's Creed 3 which works well, use AFR for the rendering mode.
Why does the topic title still have "WHQL" in it? These are beta drivers, and always have been. Now the whole internet is confused, haha.
They are WHQL Canidates, afaik the driver has been submitted to MS for certification.
My question remains. WHQL-candidate does not equal WHQL, it equals certified beta. And you will see on Nvidia's site that these are now BETA status.
How come the GTX 670s don't recieve any performance increases, but the 680 and 660 does?
Because Nvidia didn't take the time to measure actual performance difference for every video card they produce.
They all get the performance increases. Ugh how many more people are going to come in here thinking it only affects the mentioned devices. So frustrating. Do they need to actually mention every single GPU when they post drivers, we can't just assume performance increases would affect the "series", ie 600, 500 series?
We don't have to assume, we only have to read, because this is already mentioned on driver pages at Nvidia.
Yes. I haven't had issues with any driver and Precision X overclocking.
I still got the crash on most dx11 game with my 580 lightning XE
Always Show nvwgf2um.dll Error
what can i do
Anything is fine on 306.97