Nvidia announces GeForce GTX 1060

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Jul 7, 2016.

  1. Monchis

    Monchis Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,303
    Likes Received:
    36
    GPU:
    GTX 950
    It doesn´t always work the way you say either I think, some games don´t even use streaming.
     
  2. PrMinisterGR

    PrMinisterGR Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    524
    GPU:
    Inno3D RTX 3090
    For games that don't even use streaming the amount of vram matters even more actually, since if you have less, instead of streaming you get "hard" loading.
     
  3. Monchis

    Monchis Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,303
    Likes Received:
    36
    GPU:
    GTX 950
    I would still want the same frame rate than the guy who got the 3gb card and is using medium textures.
     
  4. PrMinisterGR

    PrMinisterGR Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    524
    GPU:
    Inno3D RTX 3090
    You will get the same framerate, less fluctuation and stutter, and higher quality effects that don't require computation.
     

  5. Anarion

    Anarion Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,602
    Likes Received:
    376
    GPU:
    GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
    What both (by AIBs I meant at least one)? MSI PCB has been shown already. Reference GTX 1060 is already so cheap that it's extremely unlikely to see downgraded designs in custom PCBs.
     
  6. PrMinisterGR

    PrMinisterGR Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    524
    GPU:
    Inno3D RTX 3090
    There are a couple of fallacies here.

    1) Seeing the MSI PCB doesn't mean that you have seen how other AIB PCBs will look like.

    2) Supposing that for some reason the 1060 is "cheap", while for the hardware it carries it's actually quite expensive.
     
  7. Monchis

    Monchis Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,303
    Likes Received:
    36
    GPU:
    GTX 950
    I should have added "In games that use lots of memory". And I don´t know why are you defending this, it´s like getting a 2gb card like the gtx680 equipped with 76gb/s of bandwidth (good for 38fps @max memory access) instead of the 190 gb/s it had, or the 144 gb/s the gtx660 had... 6gb on 230gb/s is just poor.
     
  8. pharma

    pharma Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,661
    Likes Received:
    477
    GPU:
    Asus Strix GTX 1080
  9. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    4,000
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
  10. pharma

    pharma Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,661
    Likes Received:
    477
    GPU:
    Asus Strix GTX 1080
    It's about as real as it gets. The pictures on the pages are to hide watermarks...
     

  11. Redemption80

    Redemption80 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    18,460
    Likes Received:
    253
    GPU:
    GALAX 970/ASUS 970
    It's as real as anything on the internet is, so who knows.

    Does seem like the same wishful thinking we saw from AMD fans before the RX480 was released though.
     
  12. Denial

    Denial Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,234
    Likes Received:
    2,725
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 3080
    The AMD driver in that is old.
     
  13. pharma

    pharma Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,661
    Likes Received:
    477
    GPU:
    Asus Strix GTX 1080
    The 16.6.2 are the same drivers the reference rx480 shipped with.
     
  14. Stormyandcold

    Stormyandcold Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,589
    Likes Received:
    320
    GPU:
    MSI GTX1070 GamingX
    Artificially low fps scores where piling on AA/AF seems detrimental to RX480 performance vs GTX1060.
     
  15. fry178

    fry178 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,661
    Likes Received:
    246
    GPU:
    2080S WaterForceWB
    @Monchis
    230gb/s is poor ?? lol

    fact one, comparing perf based on vram bandwidth (from different archs) is BS.
    just because an older card was "gimped" at a certain gb/s, doesnt mean a newer gen will have a problem.
    fact is, compression and other things improve, so higher doesnt mean better/or needed.

    980ti/titan black have 336, the 1080 has 320gb/s, yet is still faster.

    anything below ~980ti perfm level won't have enough (fps) power to make use of +6gb vram for +80% of the games out there, unless "bad" code/resource management.

    please show me 20 titles that need more than 6gb vram at 1080/1440 without using things like DSR...
     

  16. Stormyandcold

    Stormyandcold Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,589
    Likes Received:
    320
    GPU:
    MSI GTX1070 GamingX
    The review killed this thread lol.

    In the end, GTX1060 did infact beat RX480 in Tomb Raider and by higher margins than in DX12 games it loses to RX480 surprisingly. Turned-out to be a decent "all-rounder" card afterall.
     

Share This Page