New Upcoming ATI/AMD GPU's Thread: Leaks, Hopes & Aftermarket GPU's

Not shader heavy ROPs win. Where the "starved" Fury X gives the 980ti with way more ROPs run for it's money actually. I don't see 64 ROPs being an issue when those 64 will be performing way better then they did with Fury X, even w/o optimizations it would be performing way better.

 

Microsoft Will Fab Windows 10 Edition specifically for high-end PCs

-> http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/mi...10-edition-specifically-for-high-end-pcs.html

And mark my words - It will be Best for Gaming

 

Could somebody tell me what's wrong with THIS Picture?

Spoiler

PS. Please take this in a funny way
Becouse it may be fabricated....

 

No it was a bug on Nvidia. Already fixed BTW. This is the kind of stuff that happens when AMD sponsors a game.

I don't like any Dev favoring a OEM. Just make the game and reach out to both GPU manufacturers to make sure your game works on both.

 

Everybody likes that

 

It actually wasn't an Nvidia bug - DF said they experienced it randomly on both vendors, but not before /r/amd blew up about Nvidia cheating for performance.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6a6yoa/just_lurking_around_new_prey_bench_vids_then_i/

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6asgqr/someone_should_rebench_prey_after_12_patch/

It's funny because I wrote a post here after it, saying that it's going to turn into something like the Crysis 2 myth, people would use it in the future as an example of Nvidia either cheating or having buggy drivers. Turanis posted it yesterday in the news thread with the updated Prey benchmarks. I've seen another person post it on /r/nvidia and now Onna posted it, but at least he put the footnote in.

 

^ Just broken screen space reflections on NVIDIA cards. Not a big deal. Also not an NVIDIA bug. It just shows how much developers care about quality control on PC.

 

Turanis posted it yesterday in the news thread with the updated Prey benchmarks. -> That's why I know about it

Bug is a bug so we can move along....

 

You'd be surprised.

 

Eh? Talk about bias.

 

OK
Gentleman we need to move on

We are users -> Think what is best for US :hatty:

 

Good job taking one sentence out of the post and therefore removing the context. Talk about bias.

Here is the whole quote. Read it a few times. Maybe read it slowly. If you still don't get it maybe just put me on ignore.

 

Was a weird "bug" in this game at the launch.They fixed after people show them how good is working this game without shadows on nVidia side.

Anyway,from now RX 580 performs better than GTX 1060 6GB.Because drivers and more optimized games.
Few sites are to be trusted these days,the videos on youtube will be trusted because we see particular settings and real gameplay.Imo.

 

Even the rx480 1300mhz is faster than gtx1060 1860mhz this days. 22 games on average tested by HU. I assume rx580 is pulling ahead quite a bit now. It also offers more Vram.

Latest video tested the Kepler/gtx780 performance titled "How The Mighty Have Fallen".

 

The "bug" could be duplicated on AMD hardware too. It just showed up more often on Nvidia. At this point who cares. It was patched almost immediately.

 

AMD Vega 16GB & 8GB Graphics Card Specs

Vega graphics cards are among AMD’s most eagerly anticipated products. Hardware enthusiasts, gamers and professional content creators all have something to look forward to with these new high performance graphics processors and for good reason.
They’re based on AMD’s entirely new Vega graphics architecture which brings a dozen new features to the table, improved gaming, content creation & AI performance as well as improved power efficiency.

AMD will be debuting its first product based on the Vega architecture later this month called the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition. Apple announced earlier in the week that it will be leveraging the impressive workstation capabilities of AMD’s Vega chips in its upcoming iMac pro.
Gamers will be able to get their hands on RX Vega cards in late July when they launch at Siggraph. These parts will be specifically optimized for games and according to Radeon graphics guru Raja Koduri they will be even faster than the Frontier Edition.

Thanks to Apple’s announcement we now know for certain that there will be at least two tiers of Vega chips. The flagship part will feature 64 compute units and the next in line will have 56 compute units.
Koduri had also confirmed during an AMA session last month that gaming Vega graphics cards will be available with 8GB of memory and that they’re looking at the possibility of launching 16GB gaming parts as well. It’s not yet clear whether we’ll see 4GB Vega based graphics cards, to date we’ve yet to see any 4GB Vega engineering samples but it remains a possibility.

With that said let’s look at the leaked 16GB and 8GB Vega specs courtesy of VCZ, we’ll be skipping the older engineering samples because they’re no longer relevant. Interestingly, we have two Radeon Vega Frontier Edition parts that have been leaked, they share identical GPU clock speed and memory capacity specs and differ in memory clock speeds.

AMD has already announced that the Vega Frontier Edition has 480GB/s of memory bandwidth, which suggests that the slightly lower clocked part could be an older part that won’t make it to production.
The 8GB Vega engineering sample is the more intriguing one however. It has a slightly lower GPU frequency and a very slightly lower memory frequency.
Notably though it has significantly more memory bandwidth than the Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon Pro Vega 56 workstation cards that will go inside the IMac Pro. This makes the engineering sample a likely candidate to be a precursor to the gaming Vega card that we’ll see AMD launch in July.

THX goes to -> VideoCardz and WCCFtech

 

I urge you to read what you wrote by yourself, again. Take your time, and read it a few times. Then, read it slowly, If you still don't get it, get back to me and I'll explain where you've gone wrong and how little you understand about game development and sponsorship.

Though, I don't have my hopes up after seeing how bias you're in defending your own bias.

 

OK Easy :kind:

Everyone has some Bias
And we can't go and blame each other for that is not mature :giggle2:
nV Has now the best Perf->tW->$ Ratio in 1080 GPU, no point in arguing about it.
Besides nV has more Devs in pocket than ATI and we know that also

We have to have hope that Devs will be Frank to Us Gamers and will give us good optimised games for any vendor.

As for now (nV Sponsored):
Tekken 7 -> Running OK
NFS 2016 -> OK
Rainbow6 Siedge -> OK

 

And I urge you to take your head out of your ass.

The game in question is a AMD sponsored game. I said that this is what you get with and AMD sponsored game. And that I don't want any developer favoring a manufacturer over any other. Just like Gameworks. I can't stand this crap. Just make the game and reach out to both vendors to get your game performing best on both.

I suggest you put me on ignore as you cannot take your own bias out of the equation. You are so bias yourself that you see objectivity as bias against your bias.

Problem is that gaming has become too popular. What was at first a labor of love with game creators/developers, has become big business. All that matters now is profit and if a publisher/dev can take sponsorship money right from the start they really don't care what it does to the final product. See Tomb Raider with TressFX, Gameworks in The Witcher 3, the Borderlands. The list is long.

 

What was at first a labor of love with game creators/developers, has become big business.

It is said that: Money destroys everything....

But there is light in the end of an tunnel :knock: