New Crysis WARHEAD Benchmark Tool BETA

Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by japamd, Sep 20, 2008.

  1. Messerschmitt

    Messerschmitt Master Guru

    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ASUS 7970 DCU II
    I was a bit surprised today when I was playing Crysis for about an hour and my FPS started dropping to 1-2 quite often and became a bit un-playable. I alt-tabbed to check my temps on my video card and all, and yea, surprise, I had no ram left (this time with no firefox or utorrent open). had to restart the game.

    Still, sometimes I don't really understand why in the high demanding games they freeze for about a second sometimes. Can it be programs like kaspersky or something?

    Also I benchmarked GRID following the details of a website who benchmarked a few cards raging from GTX 295 to gt 7600. Their HD4870 averaged 86 FPS while I only averaged 74 FPS. The only difference was their CPU who was around 3.2 GHZ. Are some cards of the same type simply a bit slower than others with the same specs?
     
  2. Kimofil

    Kimofil Active Member

    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Saphire HD 5970
    This tool don't work on Windows 7 Build 7000 X64.
    Need some fix.
     
  3. japamd

    japamd Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    AMD Radeon HD 7970Ghz
    I didn't tried it with Windows 7 x64 yet, but I know it works with build 7000 32 bit version.

    Did you tried to set FBWHTool.exe compatibility mode to "Vista" or "XP"?
     
  4. Kimofil

    Kimofil Active Member

    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Saphire HD 5970
    Yes, compatibility with Vista helps me, thanks.
     

  5. dchalf10

    dchalf10 Banned

    Messages:
    4,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX670 1293/6800
    I decided to punish my video card for being bad and not letting me max out crysis

    Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9450 @ 2.66GHz @ 3200 Mhz
    CPU ID: Intel64 Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 7
    Operating System: Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Ultimate 64-bit Service Pack 1
    Physical memory: 4.00 GB
    Display adapter: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 1024 MB
    Video Processor: GeForce GTX 280
    Driver version: 7.15.11.8122 (20090114211900.000000-000)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte X48-DS4 x.x

    ==============================================================
    TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 3502, Recorded Time: 92.69s)
    !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 187.13s, Average FPS: 18.71
    Min FPS: 10.66 at frame 706, Max FPS: 27.12 at frame 2847
    Average Tri/Sec: 10303532, Tri/Frame: 550567
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.95
    !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 186.95s, Average FPS: 18.73
    Min FPS: 9.91 at frame 712, Max FPS: 27.12 at frame 2837
    Average Tri/Sec: 10528726, Tri/Frame: 562050
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.93
    !TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
    Play Time: 187.02s, Average FPS: 18.73
    Min FPS: 9.91 at frame 712, Max FPS: 27.49 at frame 2845
    Average Tri/Sec: 10528112, Tri/Frame: 562238
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.93
    TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
    ==============================================================

    //////////// Summary \\\\\\\\\\\\\

    01/29/2009 18:30:10 - Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Ultimate 64-bit Service Pack 1

    DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 16xQ
    ==> Framerate [ Min: 9.91 Max: 27.31 Avg: 18.73 ]

    i consider dx9 16*10 enthusiast to be unplayable with any aa, i think the game would hover between 30-40fps usually on those settings w motion blur turned off but with 2aa it more like sits 25-35 and goes below 30 way more often, which is a shame, because aa is so tasty, anyone elses machines keen for punishment for comparisent? p.s notice the 16q aa...just incase u didn't see
     
  6. dchalf10

    dchalf10 Banned

    Messages:
    4,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX670 1293/6800

    do you plan on releasing a 64 bit option now that the warhead patch for 64 bit is out?
     
  7. japamd

    japamd Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    AMD Radeon HD 7970Ghz
    It's supported by build 0.32, updated 01/30. :D

    Use the program's Check for Updates button.

    :)
     
  8. dchalf10

    dchalf10 Banned

    Messages:
    4,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX670 1293/6800
    kool thankyou very much
     
  9. AndrettiGTO

    AndrettiGTO Member

    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ATI 4870x2 cf4, zr30w
    I can't enable "Ranked Benchmark". I've tried to read this entire thread lookin for someone with a similiar problem.

    I have the latest versions of FrameBuffer 0.32 and CPU-Z 1.49 I keep getting an error telling me GPU-Z is not running.

    Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
    :O
     
  10. japamd

    japamd Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    AMD Radeon HD 7970Ghz
    You're welcome :)

    You must run and minimize GPU-Z to be able to use Ranked Benchmark option.

    :)
     

  11. AndrettiGTO

    AndrettiGTO Member

    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ATI 4870x2 cf4, zr30w
    That's what I'm doing, both as "Admin" under Vista32.
    FBWH runs without problems, just no ranking option.

    Does not see CPU-Z running.

    Edit: I have the CPU-Z application & .ini on my desktop. FBWH "C:\Program Files\Framebuffer Crysis WARHEAD Benchmark Tool\"

    Edit 2: Same issue when CPU-Z is placed in same folder as FBWH.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2009
  12. japamd

    japamd Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    AMD Radeon HD 7970Ghz
    AndrettiGTO, you don't need CPU-Z running, you need GPU-Z

    http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/SysInfo/GPU-Z/
     
  13. gerardfraser

    gerardfraser Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,345
    Likes Received:
    763
    GPU:
    R9 290 Crossfire
    Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me.

    @japamd still a great tool,I thank you for still supporting the benchmark,thanks for the 64 bit also .



    1920x120 @16xQ DX9 and DX10 64 Bit
    I was pulling my hair out with my setup,so I remove my physics card.Stopped playing in 32 bit mode and found a sweet spot for my video cards.

    E8400 -3825Mhz
    DDR800-5-5-5-18 T2
    Raptors in Raid 0
    SLI 285-679core-1261mem-1543shader


    1920x1200 64 bit DX9 16xq enthusiast avalanche run
    Min=26.29
    Avg=36.22
    Max=47.79

    [​IMG]

    1920x1200 64 bit DX10 16xq enthusiast avalanche run
    Min=19.41
    Avg=33.84
    Max=48.30

    [​IMG]


    Crysis 1920x1200 DX10 64 bit 16xq island run
    Min=11.96
    Avg=31.36
    Max=39.73

    [​IMG]
     
  14. japamd

    japamd Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    AMD Radeon HD 7970Ghz
    I must thank you all for supporting it ;)

    And now that's are some awesome results :D

    If possible, please run Ambush/DX10/Enthusiast/AA 0x and AA 4x and Avalanche/DX10/Enthusiast/AA 0x and AA 4x, I'm curious about how far my 4870X2 is from GTX 285 in SLI.

    Thanks!
     
  15. AndrettiGTO

    AndrettiGTO Member

    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ATI 4870x2 cf4, zr30w
     

  16. japamd

    japamd Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    AMD Radeon HD 7970Ghz
    No problem :D

    Waiting for your results!
     
  17. alxtorrentazos

    alxtorrentazos Master Guru

    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    6
    GPU:
    ASUS 2060 OC
    Soooooo, in your personal opinion, what´s the difference (%) between 32bits and 64bits path?
     
  18. AndrettiGTO

    AndrettiGTO Member

    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ATI 4870x2 cf4, zr30w
    //////////// Summary \\\\\\\\\\\\\

    02/09/2009 09:09:40 - Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Ultimate 32-bit Service Pack 1

    DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: avalanche @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 0x
    ==> Framerate [ Min: 31.74 Max: 122.89 Avg: 86.53 ]

    I've found that under Vista32, my DX10 performance with ATI 9.1 is disappointing. I hope we get better scaling for multiple GPU's in the future. On my wish list is a higher res. monitor to push my system more. I'm using a dual boot XP/Vista set-up so later I will check my performance under XP.

    It's a pretty neat benchmark you have here. Would be nice if the results page could have some form of summary/overview. Sort of an "at a glance" top performers we can shoot for.

    By the way, my wife's not happy at all with your time sucking creation... ;)
     
  19. alxtorrentazos

    alxtorrentazos Master Guru

    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    6
    GPU:
    ASUS 2060 OC
    BUMP!
    no, jk.....hehe
    here are my latest benchmarks using Windows 7000 64x (179.43) and Windows XP SP3 (182.06)


    Windows 7000 64x (179.43)
    Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz @ 2133 Mhz
    CPU ID: Intel64 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6
    Operating System: Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate
    Physical memory: 4.00 GB
    Display adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT (Prerelease - WDDM 1.1) 512 MB
    Video Processor: GeForce 8800 GT
    Driver version: 7.15.11.7943 (20090119000000.000000-000)
    Motherboard: MSI MS-7346 1.0

    ==============================================================
    TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 3502, Recorded Time: 92.69s)
    !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 183.81s, Average FPS: 19.05
    Min FPS: 12.57 at frame 79, Max FPS: 23.67 at frame 742
    Average Tri/Sec: 10269711, Tri/Frame: 539038
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.97
    !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 180.86s, Average FPS: 19.36
    Min FPS: 12.57 at frame 79, Max FPS: 23.82 at frame 684
    Average Tri/Sec: 10929867, Tri/Frame: 564481
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
    TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed)
    ==============================================================

    //////////// Summary \\\\\\\\\\\\\

    02/22/2009 01:30:56 - Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate

    DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 2X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 0x
    ==> Framerate [ Min: 12.57 Max: 23.82 Avg: 19.36 ]

    Windows XP SP3 (182.06)
    Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz @ 2133 Mhz
    CPU ID: x86 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6
    Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3
    Physical memory: 3,00 GB
    Display adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512 MB
    Video Processor: GeForce 8800 GT
    Driver version: GeForce Release 182 (182.06) (20090209161800.000000-000)
    Motherboard: MSI MS-7346 1.0

    ==============================================================
    TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 3502, Recorded Time: 92.69s)
    !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 177.92s, Average FPS: 19.68
    Min FPS: 13.33 at frame 79, Max FPS: 24.79 at frame 742
    Average Tri/Sec: 10630227, Tri/Frame: 540066
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.97
    !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 176.30s, Average FPS: 19.86
    Min FPS: 13.33 at frame 79, Max FPS: 24.79 at frame 742
    Average Tri/Sec: 11242295, Tri/Frame: 565970
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
    TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed)
    ==============================================================

    //////////// Summary \\\\\\\\\\\\\

    02/22/2009 01:46:33 - Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3

    DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 2X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 0x
    ==> Framerate [ Min: 13.33 Max: 24.79 Avg: 19.86 ]
     
  20. japamd

    japamd Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    AMD Radeon HD 7970Ghz

Share This Page