Discussion in 'Videocards - AMD Radeon' started by xtremegamer, Oct 25, 2010.
Yea SS fixed it but it works only in Dx9.....
Yeah sorry, I run it in DX9 along with a tweaked config file because I find this gives better FPS while looking pretty much the same as DX10.
Till Crysis 2 comes out its still hard to beat Crysis in game quality even after years of new releases. Not because it cant be done but because Xbox and PS3 have really ****ed the advancements in game quality for all. Luckaly every once and a while someone will try and do something new and we can all ooh and aahh for a game or two.
this is nonsense. This is a topic for the leaks of AMD. Talk somewhere else about crysis and such:s
Yeah, games sections here guys :-
This is the AMD gfx cards section your posting in
at least need 6870 CF to play WARHEAD 1920x1200, 4xAA, Enthusiast mode with playable, i meant min FPS > 30
I was telling ont of the posters that u don't need a lot of AA, hell play with none
neway back to the reason for the thread, the pick of the 6970 looks long lol, let's hope it's under 11.5" I want to get a CM 690 II and it won't fit ones much larger than that
Crysis looks great with MLAA.
well...I think on 1920x1200 doesn't need AA ?
you do need more than 1gb vram for eyefinity as soon as AA goes on on a demanding game like crysis or metro it will almost kill the app. on a games thats more efficient (in some respects) like dirt2, you can just about add x2 AA.
So the 6970 is 27% faster then the 5870?
And 2X 6970 is 15% faster then 2X 5870?
Is that how one is to interpret that?...
lol you can tell its not real - because the 6870 is better than the 5850 and at least level with the 470
The graph is pure bs, they didnt even try to make it look real....
actually, when comparing from a previous generation, you should divide the latter card by the former card. ie. 100%/73% = 137%. ie. the 6970 is 37% faster than the 5870.
so for 2x 6970, 55/40 = 137.5%, ie 37.5% faster than the 5870x2.
although the 6970x4 being listed as 81% faster than 6970x2 means that quadfire scaling is pretty awesome. however, i'd be pretty interested to see what CPU they were running these benchmarks on if these are real. it would take an i7 running at 4-5ghz to not bottleneck quadfire and get that level of scaling... it would probably take bodar to get that level of scaling...
i would interpret it like that:
so the 6970 is 38% faster then 5870.
could be real.
Thanks for the explanation server & storm41
They have take this on B3D forums where Forrest have put thoses spec ( fudzilla will never stop to entertain me by his write ) ... anyway we are not 100% sure...
Seriously Fuad need to stop write anything ...
And what is this bullsh*** with TDP ? as he get any real infos... lol ...
1920sp seems more plausible, i dont believe Fudzilla anymore ever since he got so anti AMD in the last few articles..