Jury Alters What Samsung Owes Apple

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, May 6, 2014.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    42,439
    Likes Received:
    10,255
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    A jury in San Jose today adjusted the damages owed to Apple by Samsung for violating its smartphone patents. Last Friday, a jury found Samsung guilty of infringing on two Apple patents. Judge Koh had ...

    Jury Alters What Samsung Owes Apple
     
  2. Speed Weed

    Speed Weed Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,066
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 260+
    Whether the story exists or not, I'm still a Samsung fanboy. ;)
     
  3. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    42,439
    Likes Received:
    10,255
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
  4. BLEH!

    BLEH! Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,137
    Likes Received:
    192
    GPU:
    Sapphire Fury
    They're gunna need another truck or two of pennies. :p
     

  5. Lane

    Lane Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,361
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x HD7970 - EK Waterblock
    Anyway, the 2 patents in questions are 2 of the most questionnable patents we have seen: slide to unlock ( that samung dont use anyway, they use the google Android unlock method ).. and the now famous "647 " Quick Links "... ( A patent dated from 1996, who have nothing to do with Iphone, but general computer ( the patent expire in 2016 anyway ).. ( basically, this patent is extremely vague and was filled at a time for different purpose )

    If you want to know exactly what is the '647 patent.
    http://readwrite.com/2012/06/13/app...or-the-mobile-ecosystem#awesm=~oDupmgtEmnn8e1
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2014
  6. Fox2232

    Fox2232 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,809
    Likes Received:
    3,366
    GPU:
    6900XT+AW@240Hz
    Well entire idea of wiki dynamic links in text or any search engines like google could be attacked with this.
    You can include any kind of "form history" where you start typing part of information like email and you get list of matches from which you can pick one you like.

    This patent should have never been accepted, because it was too general from beginning.
    It's similar to patenting passive brain function for motor skills where you do not have to think what to do, you just do.
     

Share This Page