1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Intel's discrete graphics cards will not start at $200

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Aug 5, 2019.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    36,089
    Likes Received:
    5,128
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
  2. Size_Mick

    Size_Mick Master Guru

    Messages:
    314
    Likes Received:
    105
    GPU:
    Asus GTX 1070 8GB
    So is this a real attempt at getting into competitive discrete graphics or are they just dipping their toes in the water again?
     
  3. Petr V

    Petr V Master Guru

    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    61
    GPU:
    Gtx over 9000
    Will it be on 14nm? :D
     
    sverek and cryohellinc like this.
  4. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,764
    Likes Received:
    1,492
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    If it does not start at 200$ where does it start? At 400$ like competition? This generation we are f*cked with these prices.
     
    SerotoNiN and screwtech02 like this.

  5. Petr V

    Petr V Master Guru

    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    61
    GPU:
    Gtx over 9000
    Intel maybe skip over Nvidia with prices.
     
  6. Aura89

    Aura89 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,630
    Likes Received:
    898
    GPU:
    -
    Pretty sure article says $100 and up.......
     
    Ricardo likes this.
  7. cryohellinc

    cryohellinc Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,636
    Likes Received:
    1,714
    GPU:
    RX 5700 XT/GTX 1060
    14nm+++++++++*
     
    sverek likes this.
  8. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,764
    Likes Received:
    1,492
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    They want to hit every segment but then again, where does it start? Just like with nvidia first will come expensive showcase products then 100$ peasant cards. Its Intel afterall....
     
    Petr V likes this.
  9. HeavyHemi

    HeavyHemi Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,264
    Likes Received:
    592
    GPU:
    GTX1080Ti
  10. Petr V

    Petr V Master Guru

    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    61
    GPU:
    Gtx over 9000
    "peasant cards. Its Intel afterall.." LMAO.
     
    Alessio1989 and Undying like this.

  11. Backstabak

    Backstabak Master Guru

    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    150
    GPU:
    MSI GTX 970
    Oh well price is relative, depends what they will offer.
     
    SerotoNiN likes this.
  12. anticupidon

    anticupidon Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,965
    Likes Received:
    737
    GPU:
    integrated
    Overall, more competition, the better.
    But there's a catch, Intel as already an discrete graphics architecture ready for production and manufacturing? Is this what Raja concocted until now?
    If that's the case, let's see what they're offering.
     
    cryohellinc likes this.
  13. Clawedge

    Clawedge Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,490
    Likes Received:
    695
    GPU:
    Radeon 570
    DAMMIT! you beat me to it
     
    funkydmunky likes this.
  14. BReal85

    BReal85 Master Guru

    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    100
    GPU:
    ASUS 270X DC2 TOP
    There goes my TPU comment posted on Friday:

    "As an Intel product, I can hardly believe this at this point, but hey, go along and we will see, good luck there."
     
  15. jaggerwild

    jaggerwild Master Guru

    Messages:
    687
    Likes Received:
    242
    GPU:
    Many
    fantaskarsef likes this.

  16. schmidtbag

    schmidtbag Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,427
    Likes Received:
    1,358
    GPU:
    HIS R9 290
    Kind of an odd statement for him to make. He didn't really say anything about what we should expect, but instead basically just listed the markets that will rake in the most cash for Intel. I guess if you're an investor, what he said is very appealing, but for everyone else it's like "we don't care how much money you make, we want something competitive".

    Anyway - I'm sure Intel learned from their previous mistakes. Intel's near infinite funding and Raja's experience with GPUs will likely make this GPU competitive. Though, since this is Intel's first serious GPU (that is actually a GPU and not just a bunch of Atoms "bonded" together), I think it'll be best to wait for the 2nd generation, especially considering the drivers will be very immature.
     
    jaggerwild likes this.
  17. Denial

    Denial Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    12,342
    Likes Received:
    1,529
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080Ti
    Would be pretty good if it is honestly - Intel's 14nm has extremely good yields, great performance and it's density is roughly equivalent to TSMC's 10nm process. Whether or not the GPU will be good is another story entirely. Intel has a lot of driver catch up to do.
     
    Ricardo likes this.
  18. schmidtbag

    schmidtbag Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,427
    Likes Received:
    1,358
    GPU:
    HIS R9 290
    I'd actually say this is the best opportunity for them to use 10nm. I'm still certain Intel was ready with 10nm 2 years ago, but couldn't use it because it wasn't able to achieve the same clock speeds as 14nm, and didn't offer enough of a performance boost to make up for that. But these GPUs are a clean slate with nothing (from Intel) to compare to. They don't need to push the limits with clock speed either. I assume they know where their node falls short, and could've worked the GPU's architecture around those problems.
    But yeah, I don't think it'd be a bad thing if they used 14nm.
     
  19. Ricardo

    Ricardo Active Member

    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    55
    GPU:
    1050Ti 4GB
    I don't really understand why some people assume Intel GPUs will be bad because it's Intel doing it. Intel isn't a person, and that Raja, the guy designing these new GPUs (as I understand it), has already designed Vega for AMD. I mean, I'm not saying Vega was awesome or that Intel GPUs will be the second coming of Christ, but it's pretty naive to think that such engineering team with Intel funding can't make good/decent hardware.

    Like Denial pointed above, it's much more likely that Intel's drivers will be a problem, rather than the architecture/hardware itself.

    Still, it's pretty clear that they want to enter the GPU battle along with NVIDIA and AMD, and these statements of "cost $100, all the way to Data Center-class graphics" and "2-3 years - to have the full stack" just makes it a matter of when.
     
  20. schmidtbag

    schmidtbag Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,427
    Likes Received:
    1,358
    GPU:
    HIS R9 290
    People still cling onto impressions from 10 years ago. Intel GPUs have actually been very good for what they intend to do for a long while. That being said, they suck at gaming (and even then, not as much as people think) because they're not built for gaming. They're great for things like driving multiple high-res monitors, low-power video decoding, certain workstation tasks, and OpenCL.
     
    xIcarus and Ricardo like this.

Share This Page