Intel CPUs: Ten-year plan to includes 1.4nm and a two-year cadence

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Dec 13, 2019.

  1. nizzen

    nizzen Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,415
    Likes Received:
    424
    GPU:
    3x2080ti/5700x/1060
    Welcome to toxic3d.com :D
     
  2. fantaskarsef

    fantaskarsef Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    12,270
    Likes Received:
    4,468
    GPU:
    2080Ti @h2o
    Yeah... I hate to say, but you sort of line up what I'd expect to see too (5930K), or in what situation I am (pre upgrade).


    As for Intel, there's a reason they hired a former CTO of other companies... emphasising the T here: Reuters article
    On the other hand, if they don't step up their fab game, they soon might even be surpassed by Chinese companies practically unkown here: pcgameshardware.de
     
  3. Cyberdyne

    Cyberdyne Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,582
    Likes Received:
    301
    GPU:
    2080 Ti FTW3 Ultra
    Why are you telling him this? How was any of that relevant in the slightest? Just some weird flexing? Because you have used computers a long time, you're not toxic?
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2019
    DmitryKo and fry178 like this.
  4. Crazy Serb

    Crazy Serb Member Guru

    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    28
    GPU:
    270X Hawk 1200-1302
    I thought they lost already. Except top desktop SKU with current best performance CPU, nothing else from intel makes sense when CPUs are more expensive, have less threads and only offer meaningless lead in average performance unless you are playing at 720p or lower... Considering current difference in average performance when GPU is not bottleneck, 1% low is probably more relevant then average fps.
     

  5. DmitryKo

    DmitryKo Master Guru

    Messages:
    408
    Likes Received:
    141
    GPU:
    ASUS RX 5700 XT TUF
    Intel may have lost the technological lead and thust the appeal for DIY enthusiasts, but their desktop parts are still the benchmark and have a slight lead in performance over AMD.

    While AMD parts are significantly cheaper - a $200 Ryzen 5 3600X goes head to head with $360 Core i7-8700K and 9700K etc. - this will change next spring when Comet Lake S levels the playing field again with 6/12 cores for Core i5 , 8/16 for Core i7, and 10/20 for Core i9.


    So again, Intel will have to botch every new process node down from 7 nm before it starts bleeding money on maintaining price parity with AMD Zen 4 on a 5 nm TSMC node. And IMHO there are exactly zero chances for this to happen.
     
  6. fry178

    fry178 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,702
    Likes Received:
    251
    GPU:
    2080S WaterForceWB
    @DmitryKo
    unless you have a crystal ball, it IS possible. maybe not likely, but definitely NOT impossible to happen.
    the fact that a big company fails this drastically, means they didnt make just one wrong decision.
     
    DeskStar likes this.
  7. DmitryKo

    DmitryKo Master Guru

    Messages:
    408
    Likes Received:
    141
    GPU:
    ASUS RX 5700 XT TUF
    Sure, just like the chances of being killed by an asteroid. Or the chances that a monkey with a typewriter will produce Shakespeare's sonnets at some point. Or the chances that all Intel's engineering and management teams forget everything they knew about silcon wafer production, lose any clue on how to overcome their production problems, and start throwing coins and rollling dices to randomly select their next step.

    Probably a non-zero probability as well, but practical chances for this are exactly zero.
     
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2019
  8. D3M1G0D

    D3M1G0D Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,068
    Likes Received:
    1,341
    GPU:
    2 x GeForce 1080 Ti
    Intel certainly made mistakes, but I think they were completely blindsided by Zen. And you know what? I don't blame them. I mean, who here thought that AMD would ever release a 16-core CPU for a consumer platform? Even the most optimistic AMD fan in 2017 would have considered this too far-fetched (even a 16-core HEDT product was considered extreme). And even if Intel had a crystal ball into the future, there wasn't much they could do about it in such a short period of time.

    Compounding this is their failure with 10nm and the rise of TSMC. Although the former was due to their own hubris, the latter they couldn't do much about - all that Apple money made it inevitable that TSMC would rise to the top. Even if Intel makes all the right moves with their process nodes going forward, they will likely play second-fiddle to TSMC from now on (I don't see any of us completely doing away with smartphones anytime soon).

    Intel also probably wasn't too worried about Zen 1, as it had much lower single-threaded performance and only really excelled at multi-threaded tasks (and Zen+ only offered minor improvements). Zen 2 is where the potential of AMD's design began to shine, with the chiplet design really bearing fruit (especially for Threadripper). AMD is now on another level, with consumer Ryzen products rivaling Intel's HEDT products (and AMD's HEDT products rivaling or beating Intel's server products). It's little surprise why Intel's CEO, Bob Swan, indicated that they are no longer looking to maintain their 90% share of the CPU market - he knows that this is now impossible.
     
    DmitryKo and HandR like this.
  9. fry178

    fry178 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,702
    Likes Received:
    251
    GPU:
    2080S WaterForceWB
    @DmitryKo
    you said zero chances
    and unless you know the future, the chance (which means unpredicted) is not zero.
    probability is a different story.
     
  10. DmitryKo

    DmitryKo Master Guru

    Messages:
    408
    Likes Received:
    141
    GPU:
    ASUS RX 5700 XT TUF
    TSMC is already a company with the same capitalisation as Intel (though 50% the revenue and profits as of 2017).
    And Intel is slowly realizing that having 90% of the x86 CPU market could be less profitable than having a 30% share of all contracted silicon.

    And as I said above, even AMD weren't expecting themselves to take the lead.

    In everyday sense, there are no chances for an event with very low probability to actually happen.

    https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-probability-and-vs-chance/
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2019

  11. anticupidon

    anticupidon Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,058
    Likes Received:
    2,445
    GPU:
    Polaris/Vega/Navi
    As usual, let's wait and see.
    We could argue endless about what will happen, we could predict, extrapolate.
    Just let things go naturally on their way, while enjoying the actual present time.
     

Share This Page