GPU-Z 0.5.8 Released

you can get it HERE

 

Does this fix the 580 stats that the previous gpus got wrong?

 

Yay!

My ASIC quality for my Gigabyte GTX 560 is 84% which seems to be much higher than average (reading from the posts).

So how about we reference our cards in the following format:

• brand and card name
• default clocks (speed core/shader/memory)
• overclocked clocks
• default voltage (idle V/load V)
• overclocked voltage (if applies, if not just put a "-" in that line)
• ASIC score

Mine is:

Gigabyte GTX 560-GOC
830/1660/1000
930/1860/1125
0.91v/1v
-
84%

 

I get more pixel fillrate with 0.5.6.:infinity:

 

Heh no.. I'll stay at 0.5.6 :nerd:



Strange that no one reported this, both 0.5.7 and now this 0.5.8 get it wrong..

 

I knew 057 reported wrong on the 580, it does it for the 570 too? and 058 is wrong as well?

 

My ASIC thingy is 81%. All I know is my 580 is a rubbish overclocker. At least if Just Cause 2 is anything to go on but a lot 500 series users have reported trouble with that game so...

 

My 470 got 54%.

 

According Mr. GPUZ himself the previous version are wrong and the last two are correct but that seems weird if true. I mean top-end Fermi cards are faster than their AMD counterparts but would have inferior texture and pixel fill rates. I realise there's more to it than that but yeah, weird!

edit

not including 7000 series obv

Long day, bit scattered.

 

Yes and yes..

At 770mhz its showing 23.3 GPixel/s instead of 30.8GPixel/s c1:


edit:

----------
0.5.7

Fixed fillrate calculation on Fermi architecture
Fixed ROP count on GT 420, GT 520, HD 5450, HD 6450
Fixed random values showing as default clocks on some NVIDIA cards
-----------


Latest Aida64 reports it ok too, just like gpu-z 0.5.6 :nerd:
http://i.imgur.com/WKHnM.png


edit2:
My ASIC is 100.3%

but I kinda doubt about pixel fillrate though, can anyone with latest Aida64 beta confirm if its the same as before?

 

my gigapixel is at 42gp for every version except the last 2 clock in sig
057 058 has it at 28gp

 

took 57 builds to get it right?
anybody confirm?
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=155459

 

My ASIC quality is 105.4

Exactly how is this figured??

 

my ASIC is 85.4%, not a great OCer.

 

My ASIC quality is 92,3%. I haven't tried more than 810MHz for core but that give no issues what so ever.

 

What's this ASIC thing?

 

Same, this is the first I have heard of it...

 

ditto

 

Nice! I like the link speed test. When I first go my three HD7970s I always noticed GPU-Z reporting them at PCI-E 1.1 link speeds. I thought something was wrong until I ran something with GPU-Z still opened and saw the PCI-E go to the correct 3.0 link speeds.

 

I'm still wondering exactly how this "asic quality" rating is calculated....and exactly what it's intended to represent.