Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce Drivers Section' started by peppercute, Mar 1, 2016.
Like this morning.
well then we can expect quantum brak running very poorly needing the horsepower of the next polaris/pascal 1080ti/titan.
Game runs okay for me at 2560x1440 all on High (highest you can go).
GPU usage however only hovers in the 50-60% range
Well, that's just the way those sandboxed Windows store apps work. It's hard (if not impossible) to work any driver magic on them. It's a complete failure.
The driver seems to be solid so far, though, didn't notice any difference compared to 261.91.
Xcom2 sli works. 99% load on each card.
Yep. That's an XBox game on the PC. Complete with all the restrictions of the console version. GFWL 2.0.
Also it's missing splitscreen co-op that was in the 2005 version. What a cluster of bad implementation. Such a failure.
not to interrupt the MS store chat but, how's the driver?
5 fps drop in general vs 361.91
Are you playing at 2160p or is the game really that badly optimized?
The quality only Microsoft can bring to the PC platform. Sigh
Horrible optimization even at just 1080p it put my 980Ti at 95%
Must be some ridiculously fancy graphics then...
Had no issues so far so it's a keeper :banana:
My theory would be "because it's actually SMAA T2x and temporal solutions don't work very good with AFR rendering".
You may try injecting SMAA 1x with Reshade+SweetFX and see if that will work.
In Master of Orion , the new one.
With Gsync ON / Vsync forced ON in CP, the frame rates still shoot up to 200 in the game
200 is fine. Limit it in inspector then
is this driver good for far cry primal
Colors look better with this driver.
Exact same performance as the 361.91 drivers, no errors to report.