Geforce 197.17 Driver with Femi support leaked!

Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce Drivers Section' started by bala_gamer, Apr 1, 2010.

  1. Butcher1967

    Butcher1967 Member

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Asus GTX960
  2. smokey163

    smokey163 Member

    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    8800ultra 648/1620/972
    geforce 470 will have disabled cores! can we renable them
     
  3. s}{aggy

    s}{aggy Member

    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 285
    any testers for BFBC2?

    Been running through video card drivers for the last week. seems like the older driver work best for me. Can use higher settings and frame stay the same as newer drivers or slightly better.

    I will prob give these a try tomorrow night.

    anyone have updated modded inf? thx
     
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2010
  4. bala_gamer

    bala_gamer Master Guru

    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ASUS STRIX NVIDIA 1070GTX

  5. paradox

    paradox Master Guru

    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Club3d GTX 470 on HDTV
    well for me they werent so good. lost fps in most of my games. went back to 197.25 so far the best driver for me...

    @smokey163
    what do you mean?what cores...
     
  6. bala_gamer

    bala_gamer Master Guru

    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ASUS STRIX NVIDIA 1070GTX
    It gives me a massive performance boost in bad company 2!!!

    OMG! How can this just happen!! my fps increased by 10 to 15...

    Will post the comparison soon
     
  7. bala_gamer

    bala_gamer Master Guru

    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ASUS STRIX NVIDIA 1070GTX
    197.17 drivers
    Frames-----Time (ms)--Min---Max--Avg
    1394-------30000------32----69---46.467

    197.13 whql

    Frames--Time (ms)---Min---Max--- Avg
    731------30000------19----33---- 24.367


    Tested it for 3 times and getting the same result.

    settings all high, 2x anti aliasing, 4x anisotropic, all high, 1280 x 1024
     
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2010
  8. Year

    Year Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,594
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 690

    197.17 test , FRAMES = 1394

    197.13 test FRAMES = 731

    apparently, you didn't complete the timedemo, or more precisely you lowered the benchmarking time, something just doesn't sound right to me.
     
  9. Kolt

    Kolt Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,685
    Likes Received:
    513
    GPU:
    RTX 2080 OC
    I'd like a confirmation on this as well plox :)


    Edit:

    Well I take that back, to a degree. The time (MS) is the same, so technically he's just rendering frames faster (more Frames Per Second), so theoretically (and without having done the actual math) it's possibly accurate considering how much more FPS gains he is claiming vs the same amount of MS (30000ms)

    I might test these drivers when I get home.
     
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2010
  10. bala_gamer

    bala_gamer Master Guru

    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ASUS STRIX NVIDIA 1070GTX
    Benchmark time is the same for both as you see in my post it is 30 secs for both the test, and what i posted above is the exact result generated by fraps, nothing edited:wanker::wanker:

    I also checked the graphics settings both are tested with same settings! Still i cant believe what i got...:3eyes::3eyes:
     

  11. Venomsword

    Venomsword Member Guru

    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    20
    GPU:
    RTX2070 Super
    inf mod for Windows 7 32bit is welcome ;)
     
  12. bala_gamer

    bala_gamer Master Guru

    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ASUS STRIX NVIDIA 1070GTX
    Give me the link for original inf file from 32 bit setup,ill post the modded inf..
     
  13. cold2010

    cold2010 Member Guru

    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    HD 4870
    1+ :)
     
  14. exaslave

    exaslave Member Guru

    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA 560ti
    the numbers are fine, 30 seconds test time at 24.367 frames/second is a total of 731 frames and 30 seconds at 46.467 frames/second is 1397.

    Just think about it, if it were running for example at 1frame/second speed for a time of 30 seconds how many frames total it would have rendered? 30, so the less speed (FPS) the less frames it draws in the same time. The "Frames" shown there just says that reference
     
  15. Kolt

    Kolt Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,685
    Likes Received:
    513
    GPU:
    RTX 2080 OC
    Bad Company 2 will not launch with these. Inf Modified and using Vista 64. No changes whatsoever between these and the 197.25. Reverting back :/
     

  16. Venomsword

    Venomsword Member Guru

    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    20
    GPU:
    RTX2070 Super
  17. cliffgamerz

    cliffgamerz Master Guru

    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Zotac GTX 660 2GB
    Physx not working even with new 9.10.0222 :mad:
     
  18. bala_gamer

    bala_gamer Master Guru

    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ASUS STRIX NVIDIA 1070GTX
  19. TheHunter

    TheHunter Banned

    Messages:
    13,408
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    MSi N570GTX TFIII [OC|PE]
    yea they're a bit slower for me too, i lost avg 1-2 fps in all games compared to 197.25.

    Gonna test a bit more, but so far it looks like 197.25 are better (win7 64).
     
  20. cold2010

    cold2010 Member Guru

    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    HD 4870

Share This Page