First Vega 10 benchmarks @ 4K - unofficial leaks [confirmed FAKE] Saw it on one local tech site and I must say its great as expected, sometimes even better considering its still so fresh with drivers, etc. TitanXP rival no problem! OC it and bam, no1 gpu https://postimg.org/gallery/1yo3u7xpa/ Source: well idk, but that benchmark chart looks familiar from one site. Looks French :nerd:
Losing the DAI bench made this look much more real to me. I don't believe that anyone has actual hardware in their hands though.
I remember 290X early leaks and those who leaked had ES samples, this could be one of them. I know one local pc tech site reviewer had one ES 290x back then and he gave some infos too. And if this VEGA10 is ES, well final will be better as well, mostly with higher clocks.
Like Fury X it probably excels more at 4k than below that. Only reason I can think of due to all 9 benches in 4k.
Very good. However, it's looking so good that I'm expecting prices closer to £700, rather than £600. An interesting observation; even Titan XP and Vega are only "good enough" or "just about" cards for 4k gaming. The real 4k60 "bells and whistles" cards are not here yet. On a side-note, it's obvious that GTX1080Ti can't beat Vega either, so, Nvidia is going to have to have a re-think. If the benchmarks are real, I would release GTX1080Ti straight away before it becomes less appealing. The other way is to release Volta, but, everyone's been saying it's no where near ready for at least a year...
If it performs as well as those benches, then it's going to be awesome. Probably bloody expensive, but awesome none the less. Also 1080Ti will most probably be between the 1080 and Titan. So Nvidia doesn't really have anything that will blow it out of the water. Great news for us. Still take it with a grain of salt as of now.
Radeon R9 380X release price : $229 Radeon R9 390X release price : $429 Radeon RX 480 release price : $239 (8 GB) Radeon RX 490 release price : $439 - $499 ??? A man can dream. If they going above $500, it shouldn't be 4xx and rather be nametag, like Fury.
Hell yeah we can dream. Not if that performance is real. I would think at least it would be the same as the1080 forstarters. Probably even more.
I would only assume these cards will be around $600 price point if these benches indicate anything. Problem will be keeping them in stock.
If this is the "small" Vega, these numbers are not bad. That, if we assume that the "big" Vega is much faster and of course that these numbers are not random guesses from someone.
People, read the Initial post, wth, hype all you want but it clearly states that this is 99% fake. Yet people hype as always and await a 500$ Titan P equivalent...
A nice improvement over the Fury GPU, assuming these are genuine that is. Good competition with the 1080 too although not a clear win so the 1080Ti should one be in the works and ready to release soon will be interesting as well assuming it's not quite as exclusive as the Titan X(P) is. (But then what is VEGA going to be priced at? Probably not the 480 level at least heh.) EDIT: As far as overclocking goes that's a unknown too at the moment I suppose, doubt HBM2 is unlocked officially but would be nice if it was and Wattman could make some fine tuning easier without first waiting for Afterburner / TriXX to be updated with whatever this GPU has. Voltage primarily I'd assume would be the main thing for getting good OC and of course also HBM2 should that be doable whether it's clock speed, voltage or both and then bios editing will probably follow later on as usual. (Depending on various factors I guess.) EDIT: Though AMD just recently demoed the GPU in some duct-taped, glued up config with a engineer sample (Long card is looong. ) so the chances of some review models being sent out already is probably slim thus lowering the chances of these being genuine.
