Discussion in 'Games, Gaming & Game-demos' started by Del_Boy, Jun 5, 2012.
when's the game out damn it ....
It was just a side thorn to the Germans, by the time the West invasion started it was all over and just a matter of making sure Soviets don't reach France. The West denied Stalin's call for a 2nd front as long as they could and only entered when victory was certain and to make sure the Soviet don't over run whole of Europe. If it was not 10% it was 20%. Who cares, it is obvious who took the brunt of the fighting and who capitalised on the whole thing.
The only important thing the West did was bomb the German factories and cause munition shortages on the East.
Granted without the West, the Soviet Union would have fallen. But it is plainly obvious who made the largest contribution in blood.
And it was not an American invasion of the West no matter what Hollywood tries to portray :bang:
i don't understand why they insist on either WWII or Modern, why nobody ever makes a Vietnam based game with a proper single player compaign.
it's long overdue.
i'm with you on this. i've been waititng for years! a well done single player campain would be epic.
Battlefield Vietnam redone on frostbite 2 with a single player campain.
if you want to play a good vietnam based game, try Hell In Vietnam.
imo it's the best vietnam based game on the pc.
the only con is the AI, but if you can forgive it you are going to enjoy it a lot, i certainly do, it's similar to the Delta Force series.
Best Vietnam game I've played is the DLC for BFBC2, multiplayer only though.
hmm, never heard of it. i'll check it out. thx.
i still play BC2 vietnam, when i can find a rotation server. more maps would have been nice. and a sp campaign thats why i wish they would re-do BFV on frostbite 2 with a sp campaign.
Yeah I know what you mean and it's something a lot of games are doing lately which annoys the hell out of me..
Yes. Because it's wrong and makes no sense. Just because you're ignorant doesn't mean the issue goes away.
listen to the commentary on the video, he says how they tried to make it like the movies "where eagles dare" and "the dirty dozen" etc, so this means it is not indented to be like an accurate depiction off WW2, but more like a shooting from the hip kind of far fetched action type of entertainment, if then you still cant get your head around it then its not the game for you.
Vietcong is my all time favorite.
Sure the game can be like a movie, but when you give a player a real life gun, the player expects the gun to behave like in real life. Especially in the case of rudimentary aiming apparatus, aka iron sights
Yeah cause when you're standing in open ground taking round after round from the enemy the last thing you need is to have unrealistic handling weaponry!!
Really what is there to argue about, there's a scene where he is standing in open ground taking fire from 3 enemies while taking them out one at a time with his handgun, which has infinite ammo, and ppl want to argue about how unrealistic the iron sight aiming is?
lol. This x 1000. People complain about games being too casual but it they made it so 1 assault rifle bullet in the abdomen or chest could kill you no one would play the games.
Am I the only one why still plays games for fun?
A misaligned iron sight doesn't make the game more "fun" or less realistic and aligned iron sights don't make the game more realistic either. It's just plain wrong. It's like playing a racing game and turning the wheel clockwise would turn the car to the left :|
Please take your Negative attitude away, don't post here again, and go play a game that you do like.
I'm not being negative, I'm just saying it doesn't make any sense.