I was wondering if higher fps is always better. Here is an example. if i play a competitive game and i have a 240hz monitor. i put all my settings to low and i cap my fps at 240fps. ok so lets say i have two of these PCs i have capped at 240 fps. one does have a GPU and CPU strong enough to produce 300 average fps (still capped at 240) and the other have a high end GPU and CPU where i get 500 fps average throughout the game ( but still capping at 240 fps). So both these PC are capped at 240 fps while playing this game and one have barely average higher fps then my monitor hz and the other have the double amount of fps over my hz (still capped at 240). So wich one of these setups is going to have least amount of inputlag, tearing, smoothness, stutters and responsivness? Does it matter to upgrade to a 500+ fps PC if money is no issue because the 500+ fps will play better at 240fps with the least input lag, frame delay, tearing etc?