Okay, fair enough. I'm not attempting to create a "logic loop" where my argument can't be defeated. I made an assumption that there are things that have happened that meet two criteria. One being they are considered "supernatural", and two being that they are difficult or impossible to explain, and were witnessed by several people. That is probably a false assumption, as it's based on personal anecdotes. Rest assured though, that doesn't mean I'm saying every single claim should be assumed to be true. Skepticism is a good outlook. I'm even skeptic of the things that I personally experienced, which is why I hinted heavily that it may be a brain glitch.