1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Corona CPU Benchmark

Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by Extraordinary, Mar 9, 2016.

  1. Extraordinary

    Extraordinary Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    19,364
    Likes Received:
    1,438
    GPU:
    GTX980 SLI
    Maybe it needs said connection to register itself, disable whatever blocking software you're using and give it another shot?

    Seems to work fine for everyone else, there is no install, just run the exe and it auto starts the benchmark
     
  2. GREGIX

    GREGIX Master Guru

    Messages:
    538
    Likes Received:
    46
    GPU:
    MSI 1080 /AMD v7
    Tried 4.1, worked. But 4.0 is enough for my needs. Besides...I had problem to achieve that 4ghz anyway, or even all cores 3.7 because 1 option in uefi. I figured out it finally, but OC was pain in ass. Dumb throttling every try.
    I got it delided BTW, and used coolabolatory ultra. But my cooler is rather crappy so I little affraid to OC more, as it require more V both on cores and on ring(cache).
    Cache is another story, cannot set it up more than 3.4ghz, more results in freezes while gaming(mostly my son games in CS:GO), ofc pushing V should help, but then temps rises too much for me to feel comfortable with it.
    One guy from my country(of origin) had problems too, he finnaly found stable 4.13Ghz at 1.3V core or 4.2Ghz with 1.4v, and ring 1.3 at 3,4ghz...witch is killing this cpu. He sold it anyway, and went to skylake.

    I am using 1.234V atm and it is good, ring is on 3,4 as said and 1,2v. As looking on web games test this cpu on this speed is faster than HW 4.5ghz, so no need to push it more.

    End of OT :)
     
  3. primetime^

    primetime^ Master Guru

    Messages:
    896
    Likes Received:
    12
    GPU:
    XFX Radeon RX580
    lol they guys in first place have dual XEON E5-2686 V3 (thats 36 cores for both)
    Retail around $3,650.00 each or 950 each for Engineering sample's
    Speedys cpus by themselves cost over 7k new....god only knows how much the hole pc cost to make? cpus alone cost more than my truck did. People like that have special insurance just for there pc?:)
     
  4. Arctucas

    Arctucas Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,058
    Likes Received:
    11
    GPU:
    eVGA RTX2080 FTW3
    Third times the charm, I guess:

    [​IMG]
     

  5. Ch0plol

    Ch0plol Member Guru

    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ASUS GTX 770 4GB
    i5 3570k @ 4.3
    8GB 2400MHz RAM
    Windows 10 x64 Pro

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2016
  6. Extraordinary

    Extraordinary Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    19,364
    Likes Received:
    1,438
    GPU:
    GTX980 SLI
    Nice one
     
  7. BLEH!

    BLEH! Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,882
    Likes Received:
    70
    GPU:
    Sapphire Fury
    W3680 @ 4GHz:
    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU W3680 @ 3.33GHz
    Time: 0:03:38, Rays/sec: 2,230,730
     
  8. Lilith

    Lilith Member Guru

    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    69
    GPU:
    nvidia GTX 1050
    I thought I would give this a go. I have a Intel i5 4690k that I have set to 4.6GHz max. With a bit of help from my bf this is my first overclock. It's been stable for about 4mths now. Bit jealous of some of these i7 scores tho :)

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Sir Galahad

    Sir Galahad Master Guru

    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 980 Classified
    It's crazy how well optimised this is for hyper threading.

    My 4690K @ 4.5 GHz got 1,421,760
    My Q9650 @ 4.0 Ghz got 934,828

    But my i7 870 @ 4.0 GHz got a whopping 1,564,660!!

    The i7 870 can sometimes out perform the 4690k when the i7 is overclocked and the i5 is at stock but never when they are both overclocked. I've also never seen a Nehalem outperform a Core 2 Quad buy such a wide margin before, this is mad:

    [​IMG]
     
  10. newls1

    newls1 Member Guru

    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    Titan XP (2017)
    Here are my results using 5930K @ 4.5GHz... Not really sure how to read the results and or what they mean, but here you go.. Are my results any good??

    [​IMG]
     

  11. PhantomCracking

    PhantomCracking Master Guru

    Messages:
    576
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    7970 Ghz
    One of only two 750s and it looks like I'm the only one still running 4GB memory. ..Sad, oh well.

    [​IMG]
     
  12. nz3777

    nz3777 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,370
    Likes Received:
    175
    GPU:
    Gtx 980 Strix
    How does this work>? The lower your render time is the better right? Rays/sec the higher the better correct? I wonder how my 4790k would do on this? Does memory speed impact the score on this benchmark? I am only running 1600mhz for now.
     
  13. A M D BugBear

    A M D BugBear Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,888
    Likes Received:
    186
    GPU:
    2 1080ti-XOC BIOS
    Heres mine:


    [​IMG]
     
  14. seaplane pilot

    seaplane pilot Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,294
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    2080Ti Strix
    1 second left to finish the bench. :infinity: New 5930k @ 4.5GHz testing.

    ---------------------------
    Corona 1.3 Benchmark Error
    ---------------------------
    Could not run Corona 1.3 Benchmark: Application exited with errors.

    (Press Ctrl + C to copy the message to clipboard.)
    ---------------------------
    OK
    ---------------------------

    Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished
    BTR Scene 16 passes
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5930K CPU @ 3.50GHz
    Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4.4 (actually 4.5)
    Render Time: 0:02:40, Rays/sec: 3,025,940
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2016
  15. seaplane pilot

    seaplane pilot Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,294
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    2080Ti Strix
    BTR Scene 16 passes
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5930K CPU @ 3.50GHz
    Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4.5
    Render Time: 0:02:40, Rays/sec: 3,025,510
     

  16. seaplane pilot

    seaplane pilot Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,294
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    2080Ti Strix
    Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished
    BTR Scene 16 passes
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5930K CPU @ 3.50GHz
    Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4.7
    Render Time: 0:02:35, Rays/sec: 3,117,450
    -----------------------
    Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished
    BTR Scene 16 passes
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5930K CPU @ 3.50GHz
    Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4.7
    Render Time: 0:02:32, Rays/sec: 3,196,990
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2016
  17. seaplane pilot

    seaplane pilot Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,294
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    2080Ti Strix
    5930k@4.7GHz@1.332v/3.5GHz cache / 32GB 2666MHz DDR4@1.20v

    First run of new 5930k landed me the #16 position 5930k category. Fine tuning now, I think she is a keeper & has completed into the #4 position searched 5930k. :infinity:
    [​IMG]
     
  18. AMD4Life

    AMD4Life Member Guru

    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    NV GTX 980 TI 6GB
    Finally decided to give Corona a run:

    [​IMG]
     
  19. A M D BugBear

    A M D BugBear Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,888
    Likes Received:
    186
    GPU:
    2 1080ti-XOC BIOS
    Heres my newest update score:

    Hope you all like it:

    [​IMG]


    Disregard where it says 2.8ghz, its really 2.9ghz flat.
     
  20. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,767
    Likes Received:
    1,493
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    Thats insane, BugBear. What a multithreaded beast.
     

Share This Page