1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Core i5 2500K & Core i7 2600K processor review [Guru3D.com]

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Guru3D News, Jan 3, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,112
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    ^^clock for clock SB is faster than 1366 quads. which of course means SB is a good deal faster than 1156. If you want to believe your cpu is top dog. go right ahead.
    /thread
     
  2. Exodite

    Exodite Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,909
    Likes Received:
    164
    GPU:
    Sapphire Vega 56
    *shrug* I can't even be arsed to look into the validity of that statement as it's completely irrelevant to the discussion.

    A S1155 i7 2600K is doubtlessly faster than a S1156 i7 870, every review out there shows as much - I've even linked one to back up the claim.

    Perhaps it's time you tried the same?
     
  3. Agent-A01

    Agent-A01 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,360
    Likes Received:
    896
    GPU:
    1080Ti H20
    Heres how i see it, he has 1156, we have 1155. He is trying to justify his purchase by lieing to himself saying his is faster. :)
     
  4. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    15,616
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    1156>1155. didnt anyone teach you people how to count :p
     

  5. Dragos

    Dragos New Member

    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    HD 5850
    Hello Guys,
    Tks for the Core i5 2500K & Core i7 2600K processor review. Very nice but whit some missunderstandings why did you not Clock the I5 just as you clocked the I7 in this review?
    Tks waiting for an answer
     
  6. pokerapar88

    pokerapar88 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,716
    Likes Received:
    6
    GPU:
    GTX 1080 Amp!
    Even the i5 2500K is fater than the i7 870 ^^
     
  7. Agent-A01

    Agent-A01 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,360
    Likes Received:
    896
    GPU:
    1080Ti H20
    resurrected dead thread.. :nerd: guy with 870 is hilarious
     
  8. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    15,616
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    fixed that for you. :p
     
  9. pokerapar88

    pokerapar88 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,716
    Likes Received:
    6
    GPU:
    GTX 1080 Amp!
    Yeah, lol
     
  10. pokerapar88

    pokerapar88 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,716
    Likes Received:
    6
    GPU:
    GTX 1080 Amp!
    did you?
    lol FX4100 is slower than phenom x4 955 !!!!!!!!
     

  11. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,112
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    ^^^I think he was joking. necro thread reborn:nerd:
    at least I hope it was a joke :confused:
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2012
  12. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    15,616
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    haha yea i was kidding :p
     
  13. sykozis

    sykozis Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    21,016
    Likes Received:
    668
    GPU:
    MSI RX5700
    I just have to join in the fun....

    An i5 2400 is actually faster than an i7 870.....
     
  14. Agent-A01

    Agent-A01 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,360
    Likes Received:
    896
    GPU:
    1080Ti H20
    hahah barely :nerd:
     
  15. sykozis

    sykozis Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    21,016
    Likes Received:
    668
    GPU:
    MSI RX5700
    In 3DMark11, it's about 10% faster if the i7 870 has HT enabled and about 40% faster if the i7 870 has HT disabled.

    In WoW, in 1 particular zone I went from 120-150fps to 380-420fps. In 1 particularly graphics heavy fight, I went from 6fps minimum to 24fps minimum. That's based on using the "Ultra" graphics preset. I was actually forced to enable vsync after changing processors.
     

  16. Agent-A01

    Agent-A01 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,360
    Likes Received:
    896
    GPU:
    1080Ti H20
    Since i cant find a damn comparison between the two for 3Dmark 11, i am going to say the 870 is definitely faster. In vantage, which can utilize HT very well, its about 16% faster than the 2400. And obviously 2400 is a fantastic gaming cpu, much better per core performance and many games do not work well with HT. But i was talking overall speed. applications that can actually use all 8 threads will be faster with the 870, like handbrake or w/e. http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...ore-i5-2400-lga1155-processors-review-11.html
     
  17. Phragmeister

    Phragmeister Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    138
    GPU:
    MSI GTX 980 4GB
  18. vbetts

    vbetts Don Vincenzo Staff Member

    Messages:
    14,686
    Likes Received:
    1,264
    GPU:
    RTX 2070FE
    Right...I'm just gonna close this now....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page