COD: Black Ops 3 PC graphics performance review

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Nov 6, 2015.

  1. dwiewolverine

    dwiewolverine Member Guru

    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Strix GTX 980 Ti SLI
    it's new freshhh...agree with other say to wait 2-3 patches&update

    hopefully not a mesh..:bed:
     
  2. makaveli316

    makaveli316 Member Guru

    Messages:
    168
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Asus Strix GTX 970
    I can't believe there's still people spending actual money on anything with that name (COD).....:3eyes:
     
  3. IcE

    IcE Don Snow Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,693
    Likes Received:
    73
    GPU:
    Zotac GTX 1070 Mini
    What an utterly bizarre comment.
     
  4. the9quad

    the9quad Master Guru

    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    1080ti MSI Gaming-X
    I can't believe you thought this was worthy of posting. Nice crap post.
     

  5. airbud7

    airbud7 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,843
    Likes Received:
    4,736
    GPU:
    pny gtx 1060 xlr8

    Call of Duty series has sold over 175 million copies...If you were part owner/owner of this Cash Cow your opinion would be different...

    But then again...maybe not...
     
  6. the9quad

    the9quad Master Guru

    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    1080ti MSI Gaming-X
    PF disabled and virtual memory commit charge was at 26gb.
     
  7. the9quad

    the9quad Master Guru

    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    1080ti MSI Gaming-X
    Here is a pic of the credit screen:
    [​IMG]

    It's using 16.5Gb of DDR3 2400mhz system ram. It is committing 29.5Gb of that system ram.
    It's using 53% of an i7 4930k @ 4.4ghz
    It's pushing 3 290x's at 100%
    It's using 3.69Gb of vram

    Seriously...I have no words. It's a plain black screen with white letters.
     
  8. sammarbella

    sammarbella Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,931
    Likes Received:
    178
    GPU:
    290X Lightning CFX (H2O)
    !!! IT commits 30 GB and use 16.5 GB for a tri-fire!

    :eek3:

    Hopeful you have 32 GB of RAM.

    Where are the usual "experts" saying 16 GB of real RAM is overkill and 8 GB is enough!

    :fart:

    LOL
     
  9. sammarbella

    sammarbella Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,931
    Likes Received:
    178
    GPU:
    290X Lightning CFX (H2O)
    As a RAM Glutton it wins over GTA V by more than a GB.

    Right after the intro/cutscene:

    i3700 locked at 4.1 Ghz (unparked)

    CFX 2x290X (4 GB) 1150/1600

    Installed RAM: 32 GB

    Page file for all disk drives: 0 bytes

    Used RAM 11.3 GB

    Commited RAM: 17.6 GB

    [​IMG]


    ....
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2015
  10. Szaby59

    Szaby59 Active Member

    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Sapphire RX Vega56
    Regarding the FCAT part: "BTW for FCAT I need a DVI (Dual-link) output, hence I cannot use the Fury X or NANO here (otherwise I would have done so of course)."

    According to the charts you also tested the game with an "R9 Fury" and since you have reviewed only the ASUS Strix R9 Fury I assume the same card (which has a Dual link DVI-D output) was used in this benchmark.
    So may I ask - if I assume the above correctly - why didn't your run the FCAT test on this "R9 Fury" instead ?
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2015

  11. vbetts

    vbetts Don Vincenzo Staff Member

    Messages:
    14,868
    Likes Received:
    1,434
    GPU:
    RTX 2070FE
    It's rendering each letter with max AA, AF, downscale, and all! You also must be running reshade on those letters. :D
     
  12. trocio2

    trocio2 Master Guru

    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GT 630 1GB DDR3 GK208 Kep
    How does the game work with min settings?
     
  13. the9quad

    the9quad Master Guru

    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    1080ti MSI Gaming-X
    It doesn't. Seriously anyone with close to the min settings are having really bad issues.
     
  14. trocio2

    trocio2 Master Guru

    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GT 630 1GB DDR3 GK208 Kep
    My gosh :(
     
  15. theoneofgod

    theoneofgod Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,160
    Likes Received:
    82
    GPU:
    RX 580 8GB
    18GB. Hefty.
     

  16. Mechwarrior419

    Mechwarrior419 Member

    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    980TI 1515mhz Core
    Hmm, looks like I'm not the only one experiencing texture not loading. Talked to a few guys today with in game chat with the same issue.

    Luckily for me it only affects multiplayer and disabling SLI fixes it. The guys I talked to couldn't fix it at all.
     
  17. the9quad

    the9quad Master Guru

    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    1080ti MSI Gaming-X
    I think it seems the common theme with those having SLI/CFX users is we all have more than 4 cores. Everyone I have seen with 6 or 8 cores is running into major issues in the SP campaign with SLI/CFX. Seems like peeps with 4770k etc.. are running just fine.
     
  18. Pixelize

    Pixelize Member

    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    R9 280X
    And still the game looks like s**t compared to Battlefield 4/hardline.
    They didn't understand that a military game without destruction is S**T :puke2:, and again more intense than Battlefield, worse graphics and ultra unoptimised (broken Crossfire for now, I need to play it with 1 GPU only) -> Piece of S**t.
    I was expecting more... and I was a fan of COD once... damn :rpg:
     
  19. Radical_53

    Radical_53 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,926
    Likes Received:
    89
    GPU:
    Aorus 1080 TI
    It doesn't really look worse, and the good thing is that it's look is consistent.
    Battlefield looks great here, ugly there and has terrible LOD problems.
     
  20. Batboy

    Batboy Member

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA Geforce Titan X Hyb.
    +1 on this. I am one of the people whose last COD was Modern Warfare. The rest was just commercial games only. No soul, just milking! Now the new COD is so expensive here, much more than games like MGSPP. Ridiculous specially if one takes into account that the former is a masterpiece while the second is more of the same with sub-par graphics.
     

Share This Page