Call of Duty BO3 first impressions, performance, and discussion

Discussion in 'Videocards - AMD Radeon Drivers Section' started by oGow89, Aug 27, 2015.

  1. oGow89

    oGow89 Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,213
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Gigabyte RX 5700xt
    So i ran into this benchmark, and i thought i would share the link;

    http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Call-...cials/BO3-Beta-Benchmarks-Windows-10-1169217/

    While i am satisfied of the performance delivered here, i can't help but wonder why the the r9 390x is ahead of the Fury? :3eyes:

    On the other hand, the Nvidia performance is due to the lack of game specific driver (well AMD as well hasn't released a driver for the game), but that gtx 770????
     
  2. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,505
    Likes Received:
    2,710
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    Strange resoults. 390X and Fury are close, just like 980. It depends on the resolution. At 1440p AMD cards start to shine.

    That Kepler performance though, 770 isnt even competitive. Shame they didnt include 780 performance, my 280X is probably beating it, again.

    Edit :

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2015
  3. oGow89

    oGow89 Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,213
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Gigabyte RX 5700xt
    At 1440p your card is pinching the gtx 970, and it's an MSI gtx 970, one of the top ones. If those results are any indication of the final product, performance wise your card just went ape **** again. First the 680, 770, 780 and then 970....
     
  4. moab600

    moab600 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,216
    Likes Received:
    151
    GPU:
    1080TI Gaming editi
    nvidia needs a driver lol, 770 performance are so bad 780 is bad as well 290X again rules all keplers with ease, and this time outperform 980 by a bit...


    But, it's TOO EARLY it will probably be addressed by the time the game out.
     

  5. Goiur

    Goiur Master Guru

    Messages:
    809
    Likes Received:
    189
    GPU:
    RTX 2070 by G3D
    No FuryX ? :(

    PS: Mayb im just blind and cant see it :3eyes:
     
  6. romul

    romul Master Guru

    Messages:
    337
    Likes Received:
    9
    GPU:
    MSI RTX 2070 Super
    I cant see it too :)

    I played the beta yesterday and draw fps enabled.Dont know what is
    the average and min fps but usually when i was looking at fps
    it was 110 - 140 fps,game was smooth.
    On windows 10,ultra 1080p
     
  7. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,505
    Likes Received:
    2,710
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    First link oGow89 posted :

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2015
  8. kandata94

    kandata94 Active Member

    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    R9 280X DirectCU II
    Wow, I'm very happy to have chosen this card, over the gtx770, two years ago :)
     
  9. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,505
    Likes Received:
    2,710
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    Tell me about it, 280X is still going strong, strangely strong.
     
  10. PrMinisterGR

    PrMinisterGR Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,364
    Likes Received:
    389
    GPU:
    Sapphire 7970 Quadrobake
    There was a faint point in time that I had to chose between my 7970 Boost and a (50 euro more expensive) GTX 680. That was quite the close call.

    It has beastly hardware man, and completely uncompromising. The only thing I would like to see extra would have been some ROPs, but I guess the 32 keep us going still.

    Even more interesting is that with this we see a DX11 game that is not yet optimized by hand by NVIDIA. Don't even think for a moment that the performance will stay like that when the game releases. It's still an interesting look, because the cards seem to perform much closer to each other's hardware spec more or less. My guess is that AMD's plan is that with DX12 titles this happens more or less "automatically" with their hardware, as it seems to happen for DX11 too (but with much better results under DX12 obviously).
     

  11. NXR

    NXR Active Member

    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ATI Mobility RadeonHD3470
    Does it even start in a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470? hahaha, since COD ghosts, doesn't even start because my card is dx10.1...
     
  12. shadow_craft

    shadow_craft Member Guru

    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ASUS StiX OC 1070
    7950 is still going strong, and people laughed at me when I said it was on par with a 770 with more vram, and others laughed when I mocked the 960 for being the best price/preformance

    I paid $150 for my 7950 2 years ago
     
  13. Blackfyre

    Blackfyre Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    61
    GPU:
    RTX 2070 Super
    I got the beta invite on steam too.
    HD7970 but note my CPU

    I maxed all the graphics options including anti aliasing and I'm getting between 75 and 130 FPS @ 1080P

    I only played for 10 minutes and only on one map.

    I'll do more testing tomorrow.
     
  14. PrMinisterGR

    PrMinisterGR Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,364
    Likes Received:
    389
    GPU:
    Sapphire 7970 Quadrobake
    That's a DX11 game, right? :3eyes:
     
  15. Plug2k

    Plug2k Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,499
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    2x Gigabyte Fe 1080TI +WB
    I played the beta its a bloody joke thats what it is.
    stuttering mess, and also i cant use my ultra wide 3440/1440 resolution with the game it stretches out like hell.

    ------------------------------------------------

    granted its a beta but sheesh its 2015 here.
     

  16. 1Bravo

    1Bravo Member Guru

    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    eVGA GTX 980 Ti Hybrid
    Is it me or the game looks washed out.
     
  17. moab600

    moab600 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,216
    Likes Received:
    151
    GPU:
    1080TI Gaming editi
    as time goes by, nvidia kepler line seems to be a good joke compared to mighty 7970 7950, seriously those two guys and there rebrand were the best cards to buy...

    As for 290x and 780 780ti, i would pick 780 or ti over any AMD card(except Fury), while on benchmarks 290x trashes the ti with ease, in real world i found the 780 to be much much smoother and better, the same can't be said for the weak 770.
     
  18. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,505
    Likes Received:
    2,710
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    It seems in the end, 290/290X ware better choice than 780/780ti, there is no denying that. 770 is even more disappointing.
     
  19. Bubblejunk

    Bubblejunk New Member

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    R9 390 8GB
    I like the game and it runs smooth on maxed (transparency normal and 1xsmaa) getting average of 100fps.
    Too bad I have the same problem as with Advanced warfare that the drivers crash randomly.
     
  20. moab600

    moab600 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,216
    Likes Received:
    151
    GPU:
    1080TI Gaming editi
    Not quite, all nvidia cards will be better at DX11 overhead starved games, aka startegy... in my own xp, the 780 are the best cards from kepler series, they play smoother than any radeon(idk bout fury).

    But u right, in benchmarks and seeing the evolution, 780ti get trashed even by 290 at times, but the biggest loser is 770, who get trashed by 7950, and soon 7870 :D
     

Share This Page