Bullet Physics

Discussion in 'Videocards - AMD Radeon Drivers Section' started by =GGC=Phantomblu, Dec 19, 2010.

  1. Redemption80

    Redemption80 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    18,462
    Likes Received:
    253
    GPU:
    GALAX 970/ASUS 970
    It's also because most consumers don't really care that much.

    Lots still believe its something the CPU should be doing, while those who do want it on the GPU, want it to be gameplay physics, which won't be the case anytime soon as they need to maintain backwards compatibility.
     
  2. Pill Monster

    Pill Monster Banned

    Messages:
    25,216
    Likes Received:
    8
    GPU:
    7950 Vapor-X 1100/1500
    Actually the only thing I understand, or care about is the bottom line.

    Seems you may have overlooked the bottom line... strange seeing as it's your link:

    Do you understand yet?
     
    Last edited: Dec 24, 2010
  3. ct03

    ct03 Active Member

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 260
    That pretty much meets my definition of "not much performance difference."
     
  4. Mineria

    Mineria Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,241
    Likes Received:
    142
    GPU:
    Asus RTX 2080 Super
    If it should run much better than physx, why not keeping it AMD exclusive and make some money?
    Don't get me wrong, I'm all for Open Free source with a GNU attached.
    Just trying to point to the opposite of the table, there where the investors are watching.
     

  5. Mineria

    Mineria Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,241
    Likes Received:
    142
    GPU:
    Asus RTX 2080 Super
    I did, you just didn't see me write it.
    DirectX is actually a closed standard when it comes to other platforms than Windows.
    Heck, even Windows versions can limit DirectX versions to be a closed standard.
     

Share This Page