Battlefield V PC System Requirements

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, May 28, 2018.

  1. DeskStar

    DeskStar Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,307
    Likes Received:
    229
    GPU:
    EVGA 3080Ti/3090FTW
    Thats what i want to know....
     
    Dragam1337 likes this.
  2. Astyanax

    Astyanax Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    14,899
    Likes Received:
    6,071
    GPU:
    GTX 1080ti
    hopefully nvidia will slap dice around the chops for caching dx12 shaders during play instead of at game start and this will be the first Frostbite title to not have dx12 stuttering.
     
  3. cryohellinc

    cryohellinc Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,532
    Likes Received:
    2,965
    GPU:
    RX 6750XT/ MAC M1
    In Requirements section they forgot to mention:
    -Lack of Historical Knowledge
    -SJW attitude
     
    airbud7, kegastaMmer and fantaskarsef like this.
  4. Robbo9999

    Robbo9999 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    375
    GPU:
    RTX 3080
    I can't imagine that they'll go backwards on server tick rate, still gotta be 60Hz right, or do some games have even higher tick rate? I know some games have 30Hz tick rate, but can't see them taking a backwards step.
     

  5. fantaskarsef

    fantaskarsef Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    14,122
    Likes Received:
    7,328
    GPU:
    2080Ti @h2o
    Today I read this: https://www.kitguru.net/gaming/dami...ds-the-inclusion-of-playable-female-soldiers/

    Wondering why that "dad" couldn't be honest to his daughter: "You can't play a female character because there hardly were any back in that time." It's as easy as that, would work too. They can play their modern day agenda with a modern day game if they need to, but oh well, it is what it is. I only hope the gameplay advantages of female character models are not there, like obviously a reduced silhouette (more difficult to spot), or at the worst, smaller hitboxes. That would really break it for me tbh.

    Well it depends on how much they want to spend on server infrastructure. They haven't yet reacted to the question (I have) about if you can manage your own servers again like with BF3/4, or if you have to get those fixed ones like with BF1 (no server scripts, no control over tick rate, etc). I could easily think they will start out with 30Hz with the beta to test and see if it works.
     
  6. AlmondMan

    AlmondMan Master Guru

    Messages:
    981
    Likes Received:
    303
    GPU:
    5700 XT Red Devil
    Let's nevermind that every detail revealed about the gameplay say that the game is going to play out very different. The recoil mechanics alone are enough to warrant a new title... then there's the whole new interactivity layer which might end up being bothersome, but it's also wildly different from previous games. Apart from that, then if "conquest gamemode with vehicles and infantry" is "very similar" to previous games, then why did we ever get another BF after 1942 if that was a problem.
    Several games, including Battlefield itself, has higher tickrate than 60. CS:GO for instance runs at 64 or 128hz, BF4 and BF1 on small servers can run up to 144hz.
     
  7. fantaskarsef

    fantaskarsef Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    14,122
    Likes Received:
    7,328
    GPU:
    2080Ti @h2o
    Oh they were running at such high tick rates? I wasn't aware of that. Certainly didn't feel like that all the time, but that's good, and necessary. Not sure 144Hz will be the general setting, but even getting to 60Hz is a bare minimum these days I'd say.
     
    airbud7 likes this.
  8. cryohellinc

    cryohellinc Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,532
    Likes Received:
    2,965
    GPU:
    RX 6750XT/ MAC M1
    SJW ideological game. Not more not less.

    Personally, History is History, and attempts to rewrite it are disgusting. They could have added Soviet's which actually had a significant amount of female soldiers on the frontlines and in the support instead of making things up because it may OFFEND someone. (for example, both of my grandmothers served as nurses).
     
    airbud7 likes this.
  9. MaCk0y

    MaCk0y Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,167
    Likes Received:
    480
    GPU:
    5700XT
    They need to list the system requirements according to the resolution, FPS desired and maybe also number of players in a match. The last one maybe asking too much. Maybe they will do that in the future.
     
    airbud7 likes this.
  10. Agonist

    Agonist Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,021
    Likes Received:
    1,130
    GPU:
    Dell 6800XT 16GB

    Agreed on all of that. I notice a bigger fps drop when playing 64 player BF1. Doesnt matter if I had my 8 thread 1500x or my 12 thread 1600.
     

  11. Robbo9999

    Robbo9999 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    375
    GPU:
    RTX 3080
    That's cool, I play Battlefield 1, which servers have more than 60Hz tick rate? I play Deathmatch on official servers, they're 60Hz. Do you know which ones have more than 60Hz? I don't see many server issues with BF1, so I think 60Hz is adequate, but if they want to increase it to 144Hz, then that's cool too because that's more representative of the 144 fps that my PC is running the game at.

    Yeah, that would be cool if they could list CPU requirements versus the desired fps required - e.g. 60fps, 120fps/144fps. I think there's a big difference between the requirements required (ha!), so would be good for them to put an official stamp on those.
     
  12. __hollywood|meo

    __hollywood|meo Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,991
    Likes Received:
    139
    GPU:
    6700xt @2.7ghz
    im sure you do; the frostbite engine is heavily multithreaded out of necessity...each additional player = heavy cpu calculations
     
  13. Monchis

    Monchis Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,303
    Likes Received:
    36
    GPU:
    GTX 950
    Battlefield games have always been like that, no matter the advancements in processor tech and don´t matter the stagnating netcode. I don´t see heavy cpu calculations, it isn´t AI, nor advanced bullet physics, nor players causing enviroment destruction red faction style. I used to play planetside 2 on 1500 player servers just fine most of the time on my old 3ghz quad core.
     
  14. __hollywood|meo

    __hollywood|meo Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,991
    Likes Received:
    139
    GPU:
    6700xt @2.7ghz
    planetside2 @1k player count battle runs at literally three ticks per second (yes 3hz tickrate regardless of your client updaterate) & physically despawns characters outside of a draw distance-based radius so that your cpu doesnt even calculate their positions or any actions taken. thats not really relevant comparison from a technical perspective...
     
  15. Monchis

    Monchis Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,303
    Likes Received:
    36
    GPU:
    GTX 950
    But it´s relevant from an execution perspective, 64 players have been around since forever and online gameplay doesn´t feel much better despite the massive increase in processor requirements.
     

  16. FordLynx07

    FordLynx07 Master Guru

    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    6
    GPU:
    Zotac GTX 1070 FE
    Lucky to say my 3570k paired with a 1070 and 16gb ram plays BF1 no problem. Most probably because Im still playing at 1080p.
     

Share This Page