Discussion in 'Videocards - AMD Radeon Drivers Section' started by v4npro, Feb 20, 2009.
hi people does dual screen mode with with CF
2 x 4870
How are those drives when it come to FPS with 2 GPU like I have? I mean not a one 4870x2, but two 4870 in a crossfire
Will there be a DNA one for those? and when?
Does anyone play bioshock? if so does it crash?
her si some more benchies
Crysis warhead DX10 patch 1.1(hotfix)
ingame enthusiat/gamer and 8xaa+adaptiveaa in CCC
good or bad?
hd4870 512 no OC
Q9450 no OC 4gb ram
i can´t remeber 9.1 but i guess it is similiar
Is it worth installing this over my 8.12 setup ,I used to get atiumdag.dll errors in GTA4 after an hour of play or less ,also Far Cry crashed to desktop and it felt unstable overall ,wondering whether this is improvement or roll on 9.3?
Fine drivers so far. Civ 4: BTS was intermittently crashing to desktop. Didn't do so last night but had a blue screen after two hours or so. Rebooted and relaunched, blue screen within minutes.
Looked at GPU temps after reloading OS: they were still in upper seventies!
I had turned down the fan on my Sapphire card for watching shows earlier in the week! Dialled that baby up to 65% and the rest of my BTS sessions were uninterrupted.
So I figure drivers are fine so far!
Will be giving Prince of Persia and Warhammer a try in next weeks so we'll see how they handle those titles!
Yup same here! This is sooooooo annoying COME ON ATI FFS ARRRRGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH:bang::bang::bang::bang:
Mod your bios. It's the best possible way since rivatuner tends to forget to load the fan profile, so you have to keep checking to make sure it's working. Plus modding the bios fan controller is reliable, easy, and doesn't have to rely on crappy software.
Same bug back again wtf ATI is doing... making us more pissed off just trying to achieve higher fps. First they should fix basic issues like this second core... I am full of Ati´s amazing driver release. Nice vcard, but drivers not so...
Something is severely messed up, mate... Compare it to mine, and try to fix it..
what could it be???
Yea mate, something is def wrong..
1920x1080 is the maximum i can go :S
it's a new freshly install of vista x64.
rv 2.23 controlling fan.
how do u have ur CCC options set?
AA: Aplication Settings
AF: Aplication Settings
Minimap: High Quality
Vsync: Always Off
Adaptive AA: Quality
same results here,with 9.1, lets check what we have in common:
I have vista 64, u?
i didnt install patch,u?
You guys both have Vista 64
Btw patch the game to 1.02
didnt see he done it on high, lemme try again now on high, will double post in a minute.
any way these are my results:
Settings: Demo(Ranch Small), 1920x1200 (60Hz), D3D10, Fixed Time Step(No), Disable Artificial Intelligence(No), Full Screen, Anti-Aliasing(8x), VSync(No), Overall Quality(Ultra High), Vegetation(Very High), Shading(Ultra High), Terrain(Ultra High), Geometry(Ultra High), Post FX(High), Texture(Ultra High), Shadow(Ultra High), Ambient(High), Hdr(Yes), Bloom(Yes), Fire(Very High), Physics(Very High), RealTrees(Very High)
* Total Frames: 1738, Total Time: 51.02s
* Average Framerate: 34.07
* Max. Framerate: 57.15 (Frame:278, 6.34s)
* Min. Framerate: 22.52 (Frame:1230, 33.65s
and that's without forcing AF(best result i had in te past 2 weeks XD)
this one is with high settings :
Settings: Demo(Ranch Small), 1920x1200 (60Hz), D3D10, Fixed Time Step(No), Disable Artificial Intelligence(No), Full Screen, Anti-Aliasing(8x), VSync(No), Overall Quality(High), Vegetation(High), Shading(High), Terrain(High), Geometry(High), Post FX(High), Texture(High), Shadow(High), Ambient(High), Hdr(Yes), Bloom(Yes), Fire(Very High), Physics(Very High), RealTrees(Very High)
* Total Frames: 1997, Total Time: 51.00s
* Average Framerate: 39.16
* Max. Framerate: 64.01 (Frame:309, 6.41s)
* Min. Framerate: 22.83 (Frame:774, 17.95s
i still get 10 fps less than u ppl./
Well maybe its your Processor that bottlenecks your card a little.
Its not a bad result.