Article: BaseMark GPUScore Relic Of Life benchmarks with 22 GPUs

rubbish benchmark for nvidia oriented effects should be used to test nvidia only cards

 

Even the port royal isnt so punishing for amd cards. It makes no sense using something as a regular benchmark that favors one side so much.

 

Why?

It's a benchmark that uses DX12 Ultimate and Vulkan, period.

If DX12 Ultimate/Vulkan features can use Nvidia specific hardware, the problem is in AMD only, because the code is the same for all GPUs.

My results (24/7 OC, stock cooler MSI RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio):

https://powerboard4.basemark.com/benchmark-result/318
https://powerboard4.basemark.com/benchmark-result/321
8049 DX12 Ultimate
7727 Vulkan

 

R/whoosh.
Just move on fanboy.

 

The benchmark uses only DX12 and Vulkan instructions.

It's a fact.

And your response is insult me.

 

Bitdefender spots this program as malware.
It is probably too new to be validated by BD yet.

 

it doesn't fit their narrative...did you notice the negative commenters have AMD cards?

them calling you a fanboy is hypocritical.

 

Actually I have both a 6900xt and a 3090 both liquid cooled both the same system exactly bar the GPU, I also feel this Benchmark is unfair as it targets specific features of the Nvidia cards, on a Day to Day basis if we take away the specific RTX requirements from games and just base it on performance of the GPU to render frames then both look the same, the FPS is pretty identical within a few percent and to be truthful the 6900xt uses a lot less power to render the same images and frame rates.
Singling out specific features as this does is just painting yourself into a corner or being paid handsomely to make a certain party look very good and its technology very relevant,

 

*****

Spoiler

*****

 

Yes, it is absolutely believeable that a 3070 is faster than a 6900 XT while in games the 6900 XT is on par with the RTX 3080 - or a bit faster.

 

Still slower than a 3090!!!



I'm just kidding here guys, love y"all

 

It's simple:
Please, could you say the DX12/Vulkan instructions that AMD doesn't support?

AMD affirms their RX 6000 are DX12 Ultimate cards

https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/directx12

If it's true, the difference is at hardware level, and that is AMD fault, not a benchmark's biases.

If you want make a benchmark, you must crush the hardware, all the hardware.


If the future RX7900 destroys the RTX 4090 in this test, will it mean that the test is made to favor AMD?
No, it would mean that AMD has improved a lot in the parts that this test uses.
The same thing happened years ago with tessellation, when ATI users complained that games used it too much, but forgot about it as soon as ATI/AMD cards got good enough.

 

outside the fact vulkan is another extension crapfield by khronos group, you can write code in ANY API that gives huge advantages to a specific hardware instead to another. It always has been.

 

D3D12 and Vulkan Raytraced performance.
That is where those AMD cards got their weakness, without they are pretty much on pair, better in some games and worse in others.

 

Hm...this benchmark does look pretty resembling to actual games with RTGI

Spoiler

Spoiler

 

Raytracing is the next step of graphics, stop getting angry at benchmarks just because AMD still wants to use shaders instead of RT cores.

 

3dcenter has compiled results from 1030 individual benchmarks from Ray-Tracing games

(halftone is google translate for raster )

 

even as a 3090 owner I'm thinking what's the point of this thing we already know AMD can't accelerate RT
RT that I barely use and which sometimes give a garbage result example : metro exodus rt edition that looks like 360p wth
forza looked nice but so much nice than without rt ? not really it's great for screenshots

 

and games prove that too,at least the more rt-demanding ones with full resolution raytracing

this isn't too bad for amd tbh,check 3dmark full path tracing on guru3d reviews,they totally crumble.