American has to pay 1.5 Million USD for sharing 10 movies

sigh. no pun intended.

 

Obviously this guy didn't have the sense to run the dvd's through copying software which would have removed all that sort of digital tagging, and then share the copies on BitTorrent.

 

Obviously you don't know how these lawsuits work.

 

hmm

Porn Industry = Run by crooks, and low lifes.
Court System = Run by crooks and high-end low lifes.

There is a connection somewhere


Verdict = Maximum Penalty (in crysis suit voice)

 

Sounds like he was the the original uploader!...Bankrupt......

 

Fantasy nummbers the court have come up with.

 

Man, this is bull****. That's way too high.

If only there were some way he could've avoided such charges.

 

This guy had it coming. He ripped the movies from a paid ******ing service with whom he signed a digital copyright agreement. He then uploaded the material which had been tagged with an identifying code on BT, which allowed the copyright holder to trace it right back to his account. Then he doesn't defend himself in court. The judge had no choice but to use the strictest punishment.

 

He could have not been a hero and not uploaded copyright material, porn or otherwise.
That would be the most logical way to avoid the charges.
Just because everyone else uploads copyright material, doesn't make it acceptable to do so legally or otherwise.

But I agree the fines are just stupidity, unless he's got a healthy bank account and he can afford them.
If he hasn't then why bother making such silly high fines other then to make an example of someone.

 

******ing is blocked. LOL

 

USA - country of freedom and limitless opportunities.:bang: (>cough<for the rich only>cough<)

These are the days of my life...

When living in a corrupt post-totalitarian banana "republic" suddenly seems as not such a horrible thing...:banana:

 

True, after appeals, etc, it'll be lowered significantly.

 

@Radiopassive: Oh didn't you know? They call it the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.

Jail time would be less sting.

 

I'm not really surprised by this. This is exactly why many companies put digital signatures into their stuff whatever it may be. They have the right to protect themselves.

Besides, why pay for subscriptions when there are probably plenty of free sites to watch that kind of stuff in the first place?

 

Lol, good one.

Anyway, personalities of similar judges capable of throwing you into a debt trap for the rest of your life for sharing a few porn flicks are at least very questionable for me.

Oh, I get it now. They just want for the procedure to take as many steps (appeals, repeals... whatevers) as possible, so all the attorneys in their various roles in the "justice" system get properly enormous piece of the pie.

 

I live in Hampton Virginia.. How funny.

He is pretty stupid for uploading anything from his account with them. Obviously they are a rinky dink outfit if they are not ******ing to begin with and having clients downloading the vids instead. But it did give them the ability to file such a lawsuit.

I just looked them up.. Get ready for it.....


"Flava Works, Inc. headquartered in Miami, Florida, with a satellite office in Chicago, Illinois, is a company that produces gay media featuring black and Latino ..."

AhHahahahahah!! I think that right there is much worse than the judgment..

 

didn't even read that part. that makes it funny.

 

Come on, it's too easy and unoriginal to make fun of homosexuals.

Btw. if that said "company" producing porn were making videos for heterosexuals, why would it not been as funny as it is for you in case of gay videos?

Just curious... Or bi-curious<:banana::wanker:

 

World´s gone mad. This is stupid.