1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Launches around 10th of August

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Jun 13, 2017.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    35,301
    Likes Received:
    4,436
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
  2. zer0_c0ol

    zer0_c0ol Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,976
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    FuryX cf
    It makes sense
     
  3. nz3777

    nz3777 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,318
    Likes Received:
    166
    GPU:
    Gtx 980 Strix
    That thing is (Huge) my Gorsh!
     
  4. stereoman

    stereoman Master Guru

    Messages:
    725
    Likes Received:
    60
    GPU:
    MSI 1070 Seahawk EK
    My 4790k will do me for a while but as soon as they release a mobile version i'll be picking up a new laptop, for content creation these chips are the sh!t.
     

  5. devicenull

    devicenull Member

    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GB GTX 970 G1 4GB
    That geekbench shot looks somewhat disappointing/wierd compared to those leaked Intel ones?

    That score is basically equal to the score of a Ryzen 1600X?!!!!

    Can't be right?

    EDIT: it wasn't geekbench 3.4.1 used for the leaked intel stuff, 4.1.0 for this one...

    EDIT: Seem like it's comparable to an i7-6900K.... still disappointing then, as the 6900K is only 8c/16t....? (https://browser.primatelabs.com/processor-benchmarks)
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2017
  6. beta-sama

    beta-sama Member Guru

    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    9
    GPU:
    AORUS GTX1080Ti WF
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3104123

    And Threadripper is a 16core cpu ? LOL
     
  7. devicenull

    devicenull Member

    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GB GTX 970 G1 4GB
    User uploaded bench, seems that 6800K is oc'd a bit?

    But yeah... Pretty sad if that's true for Threadripper?
     
  8. beta-sama

    beta-sama Member Guru

    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    9
    GPU:
    AORUS GTX1080Ti WF
    Its my cpu OC to 4.5Ghz.
     
  9. devicenull

    devicenull Member

    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GB GTX 970 G1 4GB
    Ahh hehe ;) well nice one, unless Skylake-X goes bananas, your system is good for another year or two ;)
     
  10. Exascale

    Exascale Banned

    Messages:
    397
    Likes Received:
    8
    GPU:
    Gigabyte G1 1070
    It looks as big as Knights Landing or Skylake-SP chips! More pins too. 4094 vs 3647 with Skylake-SP.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2017

  11. MrAMD

    MrAMD Member

    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    ASUS GTX 1080
    Not what she said. lol:banana:
     
  12. Quicks

    Quicks Master Guru

    Messages:
    538
    Likes Received:
    5
    GPU:
    Red Devil RX 470 / 4GB
    The way AMD hardware gets delayed I will not be surprised it get delayed to next year JULY 2018!!! hmm like we have been waiting for VEGA maybe we might just see that next year in stock as well.
     
  13. JamesSneed

    JamesSneed Master Guru

    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    164
    GPU:
    GTX 1070
    No way that geekbench is correct. If you go look at Ryzen 1700x running stock it is getting 21-24K or so on multithreaded.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2017
  14. Ryu5uzaku

    Ryu5uzaku Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,727
    Likes Received:
    70
    GPU:
    Vega 64 1500/1075
    Yup this would be getting less then 4ghz 1700-1800x
     
  15. zer0_c0ol

    zer0_c0ol Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,976
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    FuryX cf
    I think you mean Intel and vega is not delayed
     

  16. jortego128

    jortego128 Member Guru

    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    9
    GPU:
    AMD RX 580 4GB
    Agree about the bad score. Stock 1700 scores better single threaded, about the same multi. Def a compromised result.

    http://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/3104212


    No way a 3.4GHz TR is going to have worse results, unless the program just cannot correctly use it.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2017
  17. FlyBy

    FlyBy Member

    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    Asus 980GTX Poseidon WC
    The list below doesnt even feature that said CPU 1950X 16c/32t !



    Modell
    CPU-Kerne (Threads) Takt (Standard) Takt (Boost) XFR
    TDP
    Threadripper 1998X 16 (32) 3,5 GHz
    3,9 GHz ja
    155 W
    Threadripper 1998 16 (32) 3,2 GHz 3,6 GHz -
    155 W
    Threadripper 1977X 14 (28) 3,5 GHz 4,0 GHz
    ja 155 W
    Threadripper 1977 14 (28) 3,3 GHz 3,7 GHz -
    155 W
    Threadripper 1976X 12 (24) 3,6 GHz 4,1 GHz ja 125 W
    Threadripper 1956X 12 (24) 3,2 GHz 3,8 GHz ja 125 W
    Threadripper 1956 12 (24) 3,0 GHz 3,7 GHz -
    125 W
    Threadripper 1955X 10 (20) 3,6 GHz 4,0 GHz ja 125 W
    Threadripper 1955 10 (20) 3,1 GHz 3,7 GHz -
    125 W
     
  18. jortego128

    jortego128 Member Guru

    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    9
    GPU:
    AMD RX 580 4GB
  19. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,155
    Likes Received:
    599
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
  20. Fox2232

    Fox2232 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,029
    Likes Received:
    1,838
    GPU:
    -NDA +AW@240Hz
    Thing is that this screenshot is made from HTML view of "website". You get your result uploaded and everyone can see it.
    Guess what, there is no result for TR uploaded on given time. Actually there are no TR results at all.

    And no, user could not remove his result, because this result is anonymous. So, someone either downloaded random result page and changed it, or edited it directly in browser.

    Either way it is fake. And geeks do not remove leaked benches, nor ES results.
     

Share This Page